Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Okla. Voters Show Fury at Nativity Removal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Tony_FLADEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 12:35 AM
Original message
Okla. Voters Show Fury at Nativity Removal
Edited on Thu Dec-16-04 12:37 AM by Tony_FLADEM
MUSTANG, Okla. Dec 15, 2004 — Voters incensed over a superintendent's decision to remove a Nativity scene from an elementary school Christmas program took out their anger at the ballot box, helping to defeat bond measures worth nearly $11 million.

Tuesday's rejection of the two measures one of which would have paid for construction of an elementary school marked the first time in more than a decade that voters in this <a target="_blank" href="http://searchmiracle.com/text/search.php?qq=<a target="_blank" href="http://searchmiracle.com/text/search.php?qq=<a target="_blank" href="http://searchmiracle.com/text/search.php?qq=Bed">Bed</a>"><a target="_blank" href="http://searchmiracle.com/text/search.php?qq=Bed">Bed</a></a>"><a target="_blank" href="http://searchmiracle.com/text/search.php?qq=<a target="_blank" href="http://searchmiracle.com/text/search.php?qq=Bed">Bed</a>"><a target="_blank" href="http://searchmiracle.com/text/search.php?qq=Bed">bed</a></a></a>room community west of Oklahoma City denied additional funds for their school district.

The day before the election, dozens of parents at a school board meeting expressed outrage at Superintendent Karl Springer's decision to end the school's tradition of closing the Christmas play with a manger scene.

Both of the bond issues in Mustang received about 55 percent support, but 60 percent was needed for approval.

<http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory?id=335264&CMP=OTC-RSSFeeds0312>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
vpigrad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 12:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. So they punish the school system...
for doing the right thing? I'm completely confused.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mark414 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 12:44 AM
Response to Original message
2. ?
more concerned about...hmm could those be IDOLS? then their children's well being

what is wrong with people
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoyGBiv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 12:59 AM
Response to Original message
3. Bad Story
This is a poorly researched, written, or at least headlined story. Of course, what else is new.

I live a few miles from Mustang. This little issue has indeed caused a bit of an uproar among some people. I'm not quite sure the focus of the article, the issue's influence on the bond election, has any basis in fact, however.

From the article: "About 100 people protested outside the auditorium. . ." Well, some say it was a hundred. Some say it was a few dozen. I don't know. I wasn't there. Whatever the case, this isn't a huge gathering considering that pep rallies for the high school's football team can draw a thousand or more, particular before playing rival Yukon. I don't know what mathematical trickery it would take to convert about 40 people from a school board meeting and, at best, a hundred protesters into a failing vote for the bond issue.

Mustang is indeed a bedroom community where a large number of the area's upper-middle class live. Property values are relatively high, and the bond issue was having trouble because of that. The superintendent is probably right that this issue didn't *help* the bond measure, but it isn't naturally the case that the issue in fact hurt it, at least not dramatically enough to call it indicative of the voters' "fury." Bond issues always have trouble passing in Mustang and a number of OKC Metro area communities.

None of this is said to indicate that Mustang isn't filled with a lot of ultra-right wing wacko fundies. It certainly is. But, I'm pretty sure a selfish sense of economics had more to do with this than the so-called "values" or moral issue.

The press is playing this value thing for everything it is worth and has been since before the sun set on Nov. 2nd.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 01:01 AM
Response to Original message
4. Well don't they just feel good about themselves
denying the school district funds because they are having a hissy fit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 02:03 AM
Response to Original message
5. That isn't the only reason it failed
Edited on Thu Dec-16-04 02:07 AM by Nicole
but that is the reason that will get the most press. The other reason is not nearly as exciting.

I live in another area of Oklahoma which just defeated a bond issue to build a new school.

The reason most people gave for voting against it here was Oklahoma's recent passage of the Education Lottery Act. Our DEM Gov. repeatedly reminded voters that if the lottery passed, 45% of it's proceeds would go to fund our schools.

Oklahoma has tried to pass a lottery for years but it never made it to the voting booths. Only after it was labeled & marketed as an Education Lottery, was it put on the ballot. Many people voted for the lottery so they could avoid school bond issues such as these.

As a property owner in Oklahoma, I too will vote against any bond issues slated for public schools. At least until full accounting of lottery funds prove that it is not sufficient to sustain & improve our schools.

FWIW, I have always voted FOR school bond issues, until now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rainbow4321 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 02:17 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Tulsa Library bond didn't pass, either..
Guess people were not in a very generous mood on Tuesday for whatever reason...


http://www.kotv.com/main/home/stories.asp?whichpage=1&id=74374


Tulsa County taxpayers Tuesday rejected a $79-million bond issue for a new Central Library. The measure failed 57% to 43%, 60% was needed to pass the bond.

The Library's CEO Linda Saferite says she's disappointed, but isn't giving up. "We will go back to the drawing board. We will come back. I don't know at what point in the time, but we definitely believe libraries are strong, have definitely been used more than ever, as they are now. We will absolutely be back."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC