BuelahWitch
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-18-04 10:55 PM
Original message |
Anybody watching Lou Dobbs on CSPAN 2? |
|
He's pushing his new book to a bunch of businessmen, they're foaming at the mouth re: his feelings that business should have a conscience. He said the middle class is getting shafted and they're the backbone of this country...
|
Royal Observer
(168 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-18-04 11:20 PM
Response to Original message |
|
watch Lou Dobbs. Too bad.
|
Joy Anne
(830 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-18-04 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
His ratings have been good. Supposedly, his show will move to prime time in the near future.
|
Royal Observer
(168 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-19-04 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
8. What are his ratings now? |
|
Last time I checked they were very low.
|
Joy Anne
(830 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-19-04 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
|
Just read a blip somewhere a couple of weeks ago saying that CNN would be revamping to give him a prime time slot because his ratings are so good for the slot he's in.
|
checks-n-balances
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-18-04 11:26 PM
Response to Original message |
2. I thought corporations were classified as "persons" in our gov't, so |
|
Edited on Sat Dec-18-04 11:29 PM by checks-n-balances
...why shouldn't they have consciences?
...why shouldn't they be punished when they break laws?
...why shouldn't they be educated the way individuals are required to do?
Otherwise, aren't corporations trying to "have it both ways?"
On edit: another question added
|
Syrinx
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-18-04 11:28 PM
Response to Original message |
3. I used to consider Dobbs a republican jerk in the old days |
|
I don't know if he's changed, I've changed, or that he just seems so great compared to O'Reilly, Coulter, Savage, Hannity, etc.
|
BuelahWitch
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-18-04 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
But at least he's not espousing the same old right wing BS that everything is wonderful. It could be that he's a realist who sees that the millionaires can't hold up the US economy. Sooner or later, the others will see it too, but by then it will be too late.
|
Disturbed
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-18-04 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
He seems to be a Paleo Conserv. I heard that he is an Independent.
I do agree with his views regarding oustsourcing, mfg. re-locatioan and immigration concepts.
|
Skittles
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-18-04 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
7. the Enron debacle really got to him |
Royal Observer
(168 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-19-04 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
He seems to be very anti-business now.
|
Cleita
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-19-04 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
10. I think he's still a Republican jerk, but he's a principled one, |
|
unlike the mafia style crooks running the Republican Party now. Most Republican jerks I knew in the past, my father included, maintained that a strong middle class was what distinguished the United States from banana republics. Since my dad lived in South America for forty four years, he knew what a banana republic was. We are becoming a banana republic of a diminishing middle class, masses of poor and marginal people and a small elite controlling everything. This is what Lou Dobbs is seeing too.
|
Royal Observer
(168 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-19-04 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
11. To Hell with the elite! |
|
I refuse to be a poor and/or marginal person.
|
Cleita
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-19-04 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
12. Well, you'd better start getting active in |
|
getting rid of these people. Electing them out doesn't seem to work, so I think we need to dig up all the dirt we can on them and start dragging them through the courts, through impeachments and everything else we can throw at them.
I don't know where to start either, but start we must.
|
Royal Observer
(168 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-19-04 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
13. I'll let you handle that. |
Cleita
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-19-04 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
14. So what is your style? |
|
What I am talking about is legal. I don't understand why our leadership hasn't done so yet but it must be done, or we will become another menance on the planet.
|
Royal Observer
(168 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-19-04 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
15. This is NOT my style... |
|
"we need to dig up all the dirt we can on them and start dragging them through the courts, through impeachments and everything else we can throw at them."
That seems more like the Repub style to me. Maybe that commentator was right when he said that the Repubs won because they forced the Dems to act like them.
|
BuelahWitch
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-19-04 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
16. I agree with Cleita; time to play dirty |
|
We're not getting anywhere with the Mr. Niceguy, "oh please kick me again, sir" act. The bully quits shoving once he knows you're going to shove him back.
|
Royal Observer
(168 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-19-04 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
|
I'll say it again: "It's not my style. I'll let you handle it."
|
Rockerdem
(706 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-20-04 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #16 |
19. That means that someone in our party has to be like Ken Starr. |
|
WTF? I cant think of anybody offhand that could mimic that prick. Even James Carville doesnt come close. That strategy is DOA.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:18 AM
Response to Original message |