KlatooBNikto
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-26-04 04:20 PM
Original message |
|
Edited on Sun Dec-26-04 04:36 PM by KlatooBNikto
The PNAC document clearly calls for a cataclysmic event of the scope of Pearl Harbor to marshall support from Americans for a war on the oil rich nations of the Middle East.That cataclysmic event,9/11,appeared like clockwork after Bush assumed power.You would think the high exalted poohbahs of the NYT and Wa Po would at least show minimal curiosity about how such a coincidence occurred let alone examine the evidence. I find this lack of curiosity itself a very puzzling phenomenon.
The writer,G.K.Chesterton,in one of his Father Brown, mystery stories uncovers the identity of the culprit of a murder by the strange behavior of a dog that failed to bark.Turned out that the dog was familar with the intruder, a mail man.
The dog ( our Press) has failed to bark.I smell a rat.
|
coloradodem2005
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-26-04 04:24 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Too bad 2/3 of America does not know who PNAC is. |
|
If they did, thery wouldn't care.
|
KlatooBNikto
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-26-04 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. That points out another failure of our Press.You would think that |
|
an organization that is driving our policies would be examined more closely by our Press.No such luck.
|
coloradodem2005
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-26-04 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
4. THe press is a failure, that is true. |
|
But, they continue to succeed as long as nobody knows that they are failing to report very important information.
|
Dimsdale
(466 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-26-04 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
10. Mention PNAC to a BushBot.. |
|
and watch the reaction. Every time I've had the opportunity to do so, the reply is usually accompanied by a "WTF are you talking about?" look. Right, for the most part, these people are just too ignorant to offer an informed opinion. But less commonly, you get the occasional d-bag, whom you just know is fucking lying when he/she denies knowledge of PNAC. They fucking well know, but they don't care.
|
BrklynLiberal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-26-04 04:28 PM
Response to Original message |
3. As I watched the 2nd plane hit the WTC, I wondered what role Bush had |
|
Edited on Sun Dec-26-04 04:28 PM by BrklynLiberal
played in it. Many of my friends had the same thoughts.
|
Karenina
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-26-04 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
so I pedaled fast as I could through the park to a friend's. We watched the footage of the 2nd plane, turned to each other and said simultaneously, "CIA."
|
FloridaPat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-26-04 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
7. I gave him the benefit of the doubt until they started lying first week. |
|
Lie #1 - the bad guys got a hold of Airforce 1 secret codes and that was why the idiot was secretly taken away for 8 hours.
Lie #2 - the plane that hit the pentagon had circled Washington looking for the White House. They couldn't find it, so they attacked the pentagon instead.
These were both revealed as lies with 3 days of 9-11. This year I had a 5 week job in Washington. I got to fly out of Washington National. The pilots would have to be blind to not find the White House.
Had I know that there were military operations going on that day that were based on airplanes being hyjacked and slammed into buildings - and that these fake airplanes were on air traffic and military radar scopes so the controllers etc couldn't tell the fake planes from the real ones - I would have said the first minute after 9-11 that Bush and company did it.
|
pretzel4gore
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-26-04 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
12. yep, even know the names etc |
|
of the wargame exercises...there must be vast numbers of low level personnel in every part of the police/security system who are aware that no arab hijackers were involved in the succesful operation of 911 (there were possibly muslim terrs running around all over the place, but they had nothing to do with the thing we saw beyond fulfilling the scapegoat role) i wonder what they think about the mass murder of iraq? (not to mention Afghanistan)
|
Al-CIAda
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-26-04 04:44 PM
Response to Original message |
6. A Conservative Christian Republican says listen to whistleblower Sibel D. |
jimfromthebronx10469
(82 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-26-04 05:03 PM
Response to Original message |
|
prior to 911 is well documented at www.cooperativeresearch.org.when i came across james baker stating in april 01'"the timely advance of p-nac will likely be a slow one absent a catastropic and catalyizing event like a new perle harbor".unfortunately for the pawns of sept.11th P-NAC got their needed event.i ask was it conicidence? personally i dont think so..we have a corrupt branch on our tree called america...:wow: :scared: :dem:
|
ClearMessage
(88 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-26-04 05:08 PM
Response to Original message |
|
In case you didn't know, the movie "Painful Deceptions" is available for free download here: http://reopen911.org/pictures_and_videos.htm(scroll to the bottom of the page).
|
KlatooBNikto
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-26-04 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
11. Thanks and welcome to DU! |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sun May 05th 2024, 01:46 PM
Response to Original message |