Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Bush administration is encouraging the sale of PCB-contaminated sites

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-03 08:59 PM
Original message
The Bush administration is encouraging the sale of PCB-contaminated sites
reversing a 25-year-old policy barring any such sales before the land is cleaned.

The EPA said last month it planned to end the ban on the sale of real estate contaminated with PCBs, or polychlorinated biphenyls, which the EPA classifies as a probable carcinogen. The rule went into effect in 1978.

The decision is designed to spur the sale of contaminated industrial sites that have lain dormant for years. The push to develop so-called brownfields, including PCB sites, has gained momentum recently as mayors and other local officials have sought to locate new business in aging city and town centers.

EPA said the move is a reinterpretation of existing law to allow PCB sites to change hands before cleanup while still enforcing PCBs regulations. Previously, the owner of a PCB site had to clean it before any sale.

Under terms of the reinterpretation, PCBs still are banned, and the land must be cleaned before it can be developed for industrial or other usage. However there is no provision for monitoring the site clean-up after the transfer and it's not clear just what the government's responsibility will be at that point..

http://www.enn.com/news/2003-09-03/s_7988.asp


This is the Bush administration's attempt to let their corporate buddies out from under the requirements of the Superfund Act which would hold the industry financially responsible for the clean-up.
It goes along with all of the other 'voluntary' standards promoted by conservatives to replace enforcable regulations that they say hurts industry.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
pansypoo53219 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-03 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. i am all for recycling old land instead
of using fresh untainted land. But where is the benefit to the people if there is no clean up.
more bullshit that Nadar didn't tell us to expect.

absolutely no difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC