maxrandb
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-06-03 09:31 PM
Original message |
This Ship Naming Stuff is BS! |
|
I don't think we take this ship naming stuff seriously enough. This is taxpayer funded advertisement for the repukes for up to 50 years!! It is not only that, but the whole time I was on the ship named for Reagan, it was daily qoutes from him in the POD, Ball caps with his name plastered on it, etc. Not to mention the fact that for 50 years we will have to hear; "the USS RONALD REAGAN is on station off the coast of (insert 3rd world country) defending liberty and freedom.
Name ships after states. Name them after obscure figures from 200 years ago, but do NOT name them after living presidents.
For you freepers, surprise, there is a USS JIMMY CARTER. It is a submarine named after a man who was a "true" naval hero. There is also a FDR.
Can't wait for the USS CLINTON
|
I Lean Left
(487 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-06-03 09:34 PM
Response to Original message |
1. actually a ship named after Clinton |
|
just begs for a good seaman joke! He might do better to have an airport or something!
|
Catch22Dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-06-03 09:35 PM
Response to Original message |
2. There's the USS John C. Stennis |
Melsky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-06-03 09:43 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Does anyone remember when they |
|
wanted to have a Ronald Reagan National Forest? Or was that a bad dream I had in the 80s?
I think they should only name stuff like ships after people when they have been dead for 50 years or more.
|
beanball
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-06-03 09:57 PM
Response to Original message |
|
A stinking garbage scow,with a crew of Cpt.Slick Dick Chaney,XO Sleezy Rice,deck hands(deck apes)Lynn Chaney,Coland Powell, "Rummy"Rumfeld,Cabin boy Clarence Thomas,let them take a very slow trip to oblivion soooo looong it wasn't good knowing you bastards.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 18th 2024, 07:03 PM
Response to Original message |