Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WHAT Constitution? Lifetime Imprisonment of Uncharged Suspects Sought

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-05 06:27 PM
Original message
WHAT Constitution? Lifetime Imprisonment of Uncharged Suspects Sought
Edited on Sun Jan-02-05 06:35 PM by Nothing Without Hope
Once again, they prove their view that the Constitution is interchangeable with toilet tissue. If they further pack the Supreme Court, what can stop them? This is why we have to keep fighting.
-----------------------
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines05/0102-01.htm

US Said to Mull Lifetime Terror-Suspect Detentions
Published on Sunday, January 2, 2005 by Reuters

WASHINGTON - The Bush administration is preparing plans for possible lifetime detention of suspected terrorists, including hundreds whom the government does not have enough evidence to charge in courts, The Washington Post reported Sunday.

Citing intelligence, defense and diplomatic officials, the newspaper said the Pentagon and the CIA had asked the White House to decide on a more permanent approach for those it would not set free or turn over to courts at home or abroad.

As part of a solution, the Defense Department, which holds 500 prisoners at Guantanamo Bay, plans to ask the U.S. Congress for $25 million to build a 200-bed prison to hold detainees who are unlikely to ever go through a military tribunal for lack of evidence, defense officials told the newspaper.

(snip)

One proposal would transfer large numbers of Afghan, Saudi and Yemeni detainees from the U.S. military's Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, detention center into new U.S.-built prisons in their home countries, it said.
(snip)

------------------
Self-edited to add link to the Washington Post article cited:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A41475-2005Jan1?language=printer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-05 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. I wonder how many of these suspects may have information that
would embarass this administration...or worse?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-05 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Some, I'll bet. Some will conveniently die, like Saddam will. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-05 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. GRRRRRRRRRRR
:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftCoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-05 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
4. They love the Constitution, until it becomes inconvenient...
Bastards! :nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atommom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-05 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
5. Not enough evidence to put them before a tribunal, but enough to
put them in prison for life? Are they simply cruel and evil, or are they trying to silence these detainees for some other reason?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-05 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. They really don't get "humanity." It's an alien concept to them.
I recommend Digby's insightful blog article on the strange inhumanity of Bush and his apologists, linked to and discussed in this DU thread:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x2893162

(You'll have to scroll down to find it now at Hullabaloo; it's the Jan 1 entry.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atommom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-05 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Interesting link! And I agree with it completely. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spinzonner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-05 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
6. Do not question the decisions of Der Fuhrer

There is no law but him.

Didn't you get the memos from Yoo and Gonzales ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-05 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Confirming Gonzales as AG is tacitly accepting that this is OK.
Those "terror memos" were not an isolated aberration. This is how they really think, and they really don't see what's wrong with it. They'll try to keep it secret, because they know it upsets people, but they really have no morals whatsoever. Does not compute.

This needs to be put out to all the Congresspeople responsible for ruling on Gonzales. This is what is coming. This and who knows what else is why Bush wants him. He's NEVER going to say, "George, you can't do that, it's against the law."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tuvor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-05 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
7. And what Declaration of Independence?
I thought it was a self-evident truth that ALL men are created equal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-05 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Animal Farm: "...but some are more equal than others." n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-05 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
9. The Constitution is a dead letter thanks to our gutless Congress
going along with the Bush Crime Family's "Patriot" Act.

It should be put up for sale on E-bay, which would at least bring in a little cash for our wars of aggression. We could then save even more money by closing down the grotesque display maintained by Diebold at the National Archives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vixengrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-05 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
13. "How to deal with people long-term"?
Edited on Sun Jan-02-05 10:24 PM by vixengrl
If there isn't enough evidence to say that they are terrorists, and they have no good information to provide us with--why the hell are we talking about doing anything with these human beings "long-term"? Or if there's reasonable cause to suspect they've got some kind of juicy contacts we haven't found out about--why, let them go and monitor them--at least it's *useful*. Just holding people "because they want to" or "because they can" is cruel and senseless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jdj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-05 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
14. Thanks so much for posting this, it's been upsetting me all night.
How can they legally do this...

The world is so corrupt...is their any hope at all??

How can you detain someone for life that you haven't even charged and then say that the reason you are detaining them is because you don't have enough to charge them on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-05 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. They CAN'T legally do this, but will that stop them? Remember Hitler
Gonzales already has a history of ignoring national and international law to give these people what they want. As for them, the Constitution is something to quote only where it suits them and to ignore otherwise. If there are questions, they will rachet up the fear and remind everyone it's to PROTECT them from "terrorists." It's been a very useful strategy for them, and they're not the first to use it. It got the country into the Iraq war, got the Patriot Act passed, got them pretty much everything illegal that they've wanted. The people were too afraid to refuse.

Hitler's right-hand man Goering said in 1946,

"Why of course the people don't want war. Why should some poor slob on a farm want to risk his life in a war when the best he can get out of it is to come back to his farm in one piece? Naturally the common people don't want war neither in Russia, nor in England, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But, after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the peacemakers for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC