Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clear Channel's version of moral values.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 01:25 PM
Original message
Clear Channel's version of moral values.
Radio breast enlargement contest blasted
Women's groups urge supporters to file complaints

TAMPA, Florida (AP) -- Radio giant Clear Channel Communications has come under fire from women's health advocates over a Christmas contest in which stations granted breast enlargement surgeries to women in four cities.

In the "Breast Christmas Ever" contest, 13 women were awarded the procedure after writing essays to the stations explaining why they wanted larger breasts. A Tampa station claimed to receive more than 91,000 entries.

Clear Channel said it had nothing to do with the contest and that it was a decision by local station managers to hold the promotion. The contest was aired on Clear Channel stations in Tampa, Jacksonville, St. Louis and Detroit.

The contest has drawn the ire of both the National Research Center for Women & Families and the National Organization for Women. NOW has urged its supporters to file complaints with the Federal Communications Commission against Clear Channel and its stations.

The controversy comes within months of Clear Channel paying a record $1.75 million fine to resolve indecency complaints against New York-based shock jock Howard Stern, Tampa radio personality "Bubba the Love Sponge" and others. The station formally agreed to "clean up its act," FCC Chairman Michael Powell said in June.


-----snip--------------

http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/01/04/breast.contest.ap/index.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LearnedHand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. But it's DIFFERENT when they do it!
:puke: Fuckin' hypocrites. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. and in other Clear Channel news
Edited on Tue Jan-04-05 01:28 PM by dwickham
they just re-signed Michael "Savage" Weiner to a new contract

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
7th_Sephiroth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. the FCC is unelected
we must take them down
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
4. This is just so Rethuglican/Conservative.
I grew up in a conservative household in, basically, the 60's and 70's. In all of my 46 years, nearly to a conservative, everyone I have met leads two lives. They have their public/societal facade ('George Bush, Our Leader,'), and they have their toddler/private/other side (e.g. my mother's boyfriend taking her to get a certain illegal procedure while he was publicly condemning such procedures).

I think, in the end, they just believe in 'strict father morality,' or a patriarchal society like the 50's, and that is just the bottom line. I have to tell them, 'No, I'm not going back to that kind of society. Don't want to be a Stepford wife. Live with it.' That is why they have to legislate their 'public side' morality.

In the end, it is about disrespecting women, children, gay and lesbian persons as a group, etc. I get so frustrated just thinking about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
5. Who needs Howard Stern for radio indecency?
These turds were doing it themselves - no Stern involvement.

AND YET ON A CLEAR CHANNEL STATION!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
6. Do as I say, not as I do n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alexisfree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-05-05 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
7. what a fucking retards!!
:argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 27th 2024, 12:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC