Bush is NOT a Strong Leader

[ck4829]

I am sick and tired of Bush being called a 'strong leader'. If Bush was truly a Strong Leader, this is what things would be like:

Bush wouldn't need Karl Rove

Bush wouldn't need Pat Robertson or Jerry Falwell to promote him

Bush wouldn't be surrounded by yes-men. The war in Iraq was basically caused by this problem

Bush wouldn't need Diebold to count the votes for him

9/11 would not have happened

[liberal N proud]

1. IS bush even a leader?

[ck4829]

2. not really

[Bouncy Ball]

3. It made me laugh to even think

that needed to be said!

He also wouldn't need his bushbots to continually lie for him and live in a state of complete and total fear of cognitive dissonance 24/7.

[politicasista]

4. Yuk!

:puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke:

[OldLeftieLawyer]

5. Would our country be in the mess it's in

if we had a leader?

I'd settle for a leader at this point, but I'd insist on a duly and legally elected one.

"Strong" seems like too much to hope for .......

[LynnTheDem]

6. 911 should be the first clue of that fact. :D

That and the fact that the man is the Flip-Flopper in Chief. NO ONE flip-flops back & forth the way bushie does!

[indepat]

7. GWB is an extraordinarily strong (head-strong) leader for he stays the

course and never errs: how could he conisdering he is an instrument of God?