Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Official Alberto Gonzales Hearing Thread #2

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
otohara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 12:25 PM
Original message
Official Alberto Gonzales Hearing Thread #2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. Thnak you, otohara!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Brownbag likes the fact that Gonzo is from
HUMBLE, Texas.

!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Re-posting my posts from another thread
247396, Gonzales: Use of torture was right, Consistent with American values
Posted by IanDB1 on Thu Jan-06-05 11:42 AM

"winning the hearts and minds of the arab world... you have hurt that... undermine military culture.. violating geneva convention...

did you ever consider the impact this could have on winning the hearts and minds of the arab world.

Would you do the same thing to again.

GONZALES SAYS IT WAS ABSOLUTELY THE RIGHT TING FOR SO MANY REASONS:

1- DISHONORS THE GENEVA CONVENTION
2- REWARDS BAD ACTION
3- HELPS US PROTECT OURSELVES

MAKES ABSOLUTELY NO SENSE

CONTRARY TO DECADES OF PRESIDENTIAL PRIVILEGE

The US andmany other countries never ratified granting POW legal status to terrorists.

WE WON'T DO THAT. IT HURTS OUR SOLDIERS.

PRESIDENT DID THE RIGHT THING!!!

"We do not treat people inconsistent with our American values."

EXCUSE ME!!!!!!!

"We do not treat people inconsistent with our American values."


247484, Were these atrocities low-level decisions...
Posted by IanDB1 on Thu Jan-06-05 11:48 AM

or did they come from above?

"We don't know. We're investigating soldiers."

Torture as policy is different from the abuses in the pictures.

The ones we see in the pictures those do not relate to policy and interrogation.

THIS IS SIMPLY PEOPLE WHO WERE MORALLY BANKRUPT HAVING FUN AND I DO NOT CONDONE THAT.

The bad behavior migrated from one facility to another, because there was some "confusion" about appropriate behavior.

Abuse was not because of policy, but because we had a prison understafded, undersupported, undersupervised, under trained.

("That would seem like people above responsible will not be prosecuted. I think the american people by and large, gonzales, believe the people should be held accountable ABOVE THE LEVEL OF THOSE THAT COMMITTED THE ACTION).

Gonzales agrees.

There was failure of leadership above at the supervisors, failure of training at commander and sargeant.

"do you believe we never should have used torture?"

SELF-CONTRADICTION: GONZALES SAYS AMERICA HAS NEVER HAD A POLICY OF TORTURE! (SEE MY PREVIOUS POST).

247534, Republican Lindsey Graham
Posted by IanDB1 on Thu Jan-06-05 11:52 AM

Republican Lindsey Graham:

You have undermined the war on terror.

Abu Grahib has become a stick for the rest of the world to beat us with.

Part of my job in the military was to explain military law.

You are to follow it because it is there to protect you.

I agree with you gonzales that giving geneva protection to terrorists would legitimize the terrorists and undermine the convention.

to those who think that taking torture of the table is a sign of weakness.

powell has been in combat. i think you weaken yourself as a nation when you become more like your enemy.

i disagree with secty powell.

now having said that, the justice dept memo was entirely wrong in its focus because it EXCLUDED ANOTHER CODE OF LAW CALLED THE UNIFORM RULES OF MILITARY CONDUCT.

Those classified memos say if you go down the road suggested you will lose our identity as a nation.

this memo put our military in jeopardy BECAUSE THE UNIFORM CODE FORBIDS ABUSING A PRISONER.

It shows our troops they have an obligation to follow the law.

I want you to comment and defend your actions

247593, Gonzales: I disagree
Posted by IanDB1 on Thu Jan-06-05 11:58 AM

We are nothing like our enemy.

Daniel Pearl...

(I am not saying we are like our enemy, but we are not who we want to be. we are losing our moral highground. once you start down this road... my challengeb to you is leading without losing our legitimacy. Guantanomo is a chaos. Humanity is not inconsistent with winning the war...)

With Guantanomo, the supreme court disagreed with policy. I believe an enemy combatant held outside us territory is not guaranteed due process.

Secretary England has responsibility for tribunals "substantial opportunity to refute charges."

(WHat is the executive dept doing to reconcile the court and your policy? I'll vote for you. My problem is the DOJ memo was out there for 2 years, but I'd like to get you to comment if you could, do you beliebe that a professional lawyer's oppinion that violating the military code of justice may put our troops in jeopardy?)

VERY LONG PAUSE BY GONZALES.

(You don't need to answer that right now.)

HE LET HIM OFF THE HOOK!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. on to recidivism
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
4. SCHUMER Lays Out the Criterion for Approving This Job as Opposed to SCOTUS
Edited on Thu Jan-06-05 12:31 PM by UTUSN
"Just because we vote yes this time, because the pRez should have leeway in Executive branch nominees as opposed to the independent judiciary, like Supreme Court" it doesn't mean we won't be MUCH tougher on SCOTUS nominees. Oh, oh-tay.


SCHUMER: "You must know what the Constitution says, you are being nominated for (the top job dealing with the law). Find me the words in the Constitution that say there must be a majority vote..."

The stupidhead GONZALES ducks the question, "Please allow me time to go back and check MY Constitution..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. I have no doubt he has his own specially written one
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
two gun sid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. Bet its an abridged version
Leaves off the Bill Of Rights!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Yep!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phylny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. One of the many reasons I really like Schumer.
He's smart, he's savvy, and he's nobody's idiot.

I LOVE the fact that he tossed it back in Gonzles' face, reminding him that he's had PLENTY of time to form an opinion or view.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. Sen. Brownnose: Faith-based prisons, pornography addiction
I hope you'll enforce community standards on obscenity.

Gonzales: I will look at this and deal with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
two gun sid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
7. Faith-based prison LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. thats where the guards can torture you but they get forgiven
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TOOLZ Donating Member (477 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
9. AN OUTRAGE
How can Bush's personal lawyer be appointed the Top Cop? He will be immune from prosecution, innocent Iraqis in a late-night round up will not be immune from the worst human rights abuses. We have lost so much credibility in the eyes of the world since Abu Grahib, then againw ith the Navy pictures, this is only sealing our fates as unrepentant infidels.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #9
41. This administration has lost all credibility with ME!!!
Gonzales opines that the president "theoretically" can usurp the power of both the judicial and legislative branches and render a law "unconstitutional".

That opinion orients more around "dictatorship" than "democracy" or the U.S. Constitution which creates three branches of government in order to balance powers.

That opinion should scare the beegeezus out of every American citizen!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #41
48. When does he "theoretically" name himself "Prez for Life"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #41
49. When does he "theoretically" name himself "Prez for Life"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
12. thank goodness brownnose is speaking to the horrors of pr0n addiction
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
two gun sid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. Yes, and all those minors trying to get abortions
without parental consent!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
17. Oh yeah. for the safety of america we really need gonzales (NOT)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
18. Anybody Know LIMBOsevic's Call-in Phone #?
Yesterday he and his dittoheads were harping on how "Hispanics should be OUTRAGED that this is the SECOND Hispanic the Dems have bloodied up."

Yeah, right, like they really ARE bloodying this dude up. They're practically tonguing him. But the real point is that, like ESTRADA or Clarence THOMAS, opposition to this dude is NOT race-based, it is on his EITHER being 1) a committed wingnut OR 2) (more likely) an errand boy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
19. torture tactics float through the air, travel over the seas, and
then land in other countries. All by themselves
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. Oh, the Torture Was Limited to the Night Shift, Well Alrighty Then n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. Makes all the difference...just one shift of torture
gawds
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
20. "consistent with american values" ("procedures" for intell)
I think I'll pass on those american values, thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. He didn't say it wasn't torture..he said "our policy is that we didn't
Edited on Thu Jan-06-05 12:45 PM by Solly Mack
engage in torture." IOW's...they don't think it was torture so it wasn't torture
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
24. Gonzales: Ultimately, the courts will make that decision
You mean ACTIVIST JUDGES???

"I am concerned you would allow a president to decide what is constitutional and then wait for the courts to make the decision."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
two gun sid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
25. Who cares what the SCOTUS said 52 years ago
9-11 changed everything. This shit is unbelievable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
26. "mistakes" torture is now a mistake? like when I forget to carry a number
in my checkbook?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
two gun sid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. If you wrote bad checks because of it
that would be a crime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. no shit lol but I could torture and never go to jail
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
two gun sid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. Yes, that would be consistent with american values
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #32
35. Yes, that's what I found out today
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
27. Jay Bybee
Cold Fronts

The London case involves our old friends, BCCI, the international bank that served as the front for a global crime ring involving top officials and Establishment worthies in dozens of "civilized" nations. BCCI ran guns to Saddam and other heavies, funded Pakistan's illegal nuclear weapons program, laundered drug profits, peddled prostitutes, doled out bribes, served as a conduit for covert CIA operations -- and, through its connections to the bin Laden family, gave George W. Bush a sweetheart loan of $25 million to bail out one of his many business failures.

....

That's because the trial could open a can of particularly grubby worms concerning the British government's extensive canoodling with BCCI. A host of worthies are expected to be grilled in the dock, including John Major, former British prime minister and current business partner of George Bush I in yet another secretive international front that profits from war, weapons, violence, repression and the greasing of highly-placed palms: the Carlyle Group.

....

The Italian bank BNL was one of BCCI's main tentacles. BNL's Atlanta branch was the primary funnel used by the first Bush administration to send millions of secret dollars to Saddam for arms purchases, including deadly chemicals and other WMD materials supplied by the Chilean arms dealer Cardoen and various politically connected operators in the United States like, weapons merchant Matrix Churchill. (As always with the Busha Nostra, geopolitics -- in this case, helping Saddam wage aggressive war against Iran -- and crony profits go hand in hand. Once the war was over and Iran was left a shattered hulk, with millions dead and displaced, the useful idiot Saddam was expendable, swiftly morphing from good buddy into budding Hitler.)

As soon as the BNL case broke, President Bush I moved to throttle the investigation. He appointed lawyers from both Cardoen and Matrix to top Justice Department posts -- where they supervised the officials investigating their old companies. Meanwhile, White House aides applied heavy pressure on other prosecutors to restrict the range of the probe -- especially the fact that Bush Cabinet officials Brent Scowcroft and Lawrence Eagleburger had served as consultants for BNL during their pre-White House days as spear-carriers for yet another secretive international front that profits from war, weapons, etc., etc.: Kissinger Associates.

Which brings us to the judicial appointment. One of the White House aides who unlawfully intervened in the BNL prosecution was a certain factotum named Jay ByBee. Last week, said factotum was nominated by the current warmer of the Oval Office seat, George W. Bush, to a place on the federal appeals court -- a lifetime sinecure of perks and power. Well done, thou good and faithful servant!

And the commodities connection? President Pretzel's relentless hissy-fit for war on Iraq has of course goosed the price of gold enormously -- and that's set Bush Family coffers a-clinking. How so? In the waning days of his failed presidency, Bush I invoked an obscure 1872 statute to give a Canadian firm, Barrick Corp., the right to mine $10 billion in gold from U.S. public lands. (U.S. taxpayers got a whopping $10,000 fee in return.) Bush then joined Barrick as a highly paid "international consultant," brokering deals with various dictators of his close acquaintance. Barrick reciprocated with big bucks for Junior's presidential run. And in another quid for the old pro quo, last year Junior dutifully approved Barrick's controversial acquisition of a major rival. (Barrick is also one of the biggest polluters in America, by the way.)

more
http://www.makethemaccountable.com/floyd/030214_ColdFronts.htm




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
28. My recap here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. I love it!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catfight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #28
33. Any questions regarding his Enron loyalty? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #33
36. No nor any about Halliburton campaign donations to Texas judges
None what so ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
two gun sid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #28
37. I wasted my time watching the hearing
your recap told me everything I needed to know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. Thanks
Welcome to DU :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #37
40. Hey! You are new aren't you? lol WELCOME!!!!!
You've been a most enjoyable fellow hearing watcher!!!!!!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
two gun sid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #40
42. Thanks, Usually at work during the day but I've got the flu
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #42
45. Hope you feel better soon!!!!!
I'll be back to this thread when they resume....the certification of the presidential votes were challenged. Currently tuned to CSPAN on line
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
34. I am TOTALLY freaked out at Gonzales opinion that
"theoretically" this President can basically ignore both the legislative AND judicial branch and proclaim a law "unconstitutional"!!

Does that man have any freakin' clue the gravity of such an opinion?!?!

DAMN!!!

This cabal scares the living crap out of me!!! :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #34
39. we should all be scared...very scared
But hey! he promises to do better (cough)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RuleofLaw Donating Member (345 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #34
43. I noticed that too
I thought it was the job of the Courts to declare a law unconstitutional. But, according to TortureZales, the President can choose to follow the law or not all by himself.:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. He advocates that the president can VIOLATE a law,...
,...enacted by the legislative branch,...and continue in violation until SCOTUS rules otherwise.

Crazier still,...even after the SCOTUS makes a ruling (example; the Gitma cases),...the president can continue to push the line until SCOTUS, again, rules against him.

He advocates a defiance of our own form of government, if the president so chooses to do so.

THAT is called a dictatorship or totalitarianism!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
idiosyncratic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
46. The political cartoonists get it . . .




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. ROFL! So true!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
two gun sid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
50. What concerns me Arlen is criminals with magic bullets
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RuleofLaw Donating Member (345 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
51. Can the president immunize those who commits torture under his orders?
Question by Senator Leahy:

Answer: Hypothetical question that is not going to happen.

Totally avoids the question.

Says Bush will not approve torture

"I am not prepared to give you an opinion"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
two gun sid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
52. American citizen or enemy combatant? We'll be the judge
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RuleofLaw Donating Member (345 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
53. How can this guy be the next AG?
He can't remember if he requested the Torture Memo?

Now he is totally distancing himself from everything in the memo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
two gun sid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
54. Hey, Ted's gonna ask him about US law
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RuleofLaw Donating Member (345 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
55. He cannot answer one single question!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RuleofLaw Donating Member (345 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
56. His name is all over the memos
yet he cannot answer a single question.

He keeps holding on to the fact that the torture memo was rejected so no need to look at it.

Ted Kennedy keeps hammering him!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
57. tuning back in
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftPeopleFinishFirst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
58. Side note... I've been to a teenagers' press conference with Gonzales.
Even there he would avoid questions, and it wasn't even being videotaped/recorded. The questions weren't even earth-shattering. This was before we could have questioned him about Abu Ghraib and numerous other Bush idiocies. It didn't matter. Whenever a question was asked, he'd fancy up the question, reform it, and spit it back out. There was absolutely no answer in anything he said. He's doing the same thing now and I hope most of the senators will be able to see that.

:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #58
59. Tactic to avoid telling a lie and evade the truth,...don't answer,...
the question!!!

Distract/divert/divulge in anything other than that which is a direct answer to a question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftPeopleFinishFirst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #59
77. Yep
The Republicans seem to do a decent job at avoiding questions. Gonzales is no exception.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
two gun sid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
60. Sessions willing to excuse torture because of 9-11
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #60
61. How big of him
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
two gun sid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
62. New AG approves torture for crackheads
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
63. Yo! Senator. This is a confirmation hearing...not a chance to
campaign and feed Gonzales softballs. You do remember your job, yes?


Kennedy up now

Immigration/civil rights/death penalty issues:

gah..Kennedy quoted Norquist. That had to hurt.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
64. Gonzales is using every excuse in the book for not answering a question
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
two gun sid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #64
65. He won't even answer the softballs the repugs are throwin' him
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #65
67. Yet they act so pleased with his non-answers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #64
66. I'll review. I'll get back to you. I'll check into that. I can't answer.
Gonzales: I'm going to play this charade out so the people watching will continue to delude themselves into believing they have a choice in government. Fact is, I'm not answering a damn question and there's nothing you can do about it. (well, ok. that's me speaking for Gonzales...but somebody's gotta answer for him...he's not answering.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #66
68. I'm not prepared at this time but I look forward to meeting with you
about it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
two gun sid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #66
69. LOL.
we got more out your post than we've got from Gonzo all day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #69
70. Just doing my part
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #70
71. He finally said it. "I don't recall" ..the usual republican answer
Edited on Thu Jan-06-05 05:03 PM by Solly Mack
whew...for a minute there I thought he was reading from a new script
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
two gun sid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
72. This is our new AG
I trust him to protect my civil rights less than I trusted John Mitchell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
73. NO! let him non-respond in person!!!!! we won't get to read his memo
until it gets leaked 2 years from now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
two gun sid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #73
76. Yeah, like when he screws up so bad
that the Bush Admin feels the need to discredit and dump him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
74. I wished my parents had been this soft on me..and so polite too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
75. "I'll be as responsive as I reasonably can"
Oh, great.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
78. Oh goody! Gonzales is going to do his best
Boy, do I feel better now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
two gun sid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #78
80. We are fucked. At least Leahy said he was not responsive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #80
81. We've been fucked..no kissing . no hugging...just screwed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
79. Please, Gonzales, come to us for help. Please!!!!
Yeah, that's gonna happen...it worked so well before
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
two gun sid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
82. This might get good. I heard these guys hate Gonzo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
83. " we hold these gifts in trust for our progeny" I finally got it!!!
*we* can't have democracy because they've put it in a lock box for people of the future
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #83
84. well, ok...gonzales is being spanked by the witness
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #84
85. bless this man....they'll never "hear" what he is saying
and gonzales will be confirmed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #85
87. hehe "nomination to AG is NOT accountability" (for torture)
"if gonzales becomes ag after this (torture), we (america) would have failed to undo a wrong"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
two gun sid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #87
89. Gonzales should be made to sit and listen to what these real
americans have say!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #89
90. I agree
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
two gun sid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #84
86. There are a whole group of ex-military that
want to stop Gonzales. They know that torture will ruin the military.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #86
88. Yes. But these "support the troops" lip servicers don't extend that
support to actually heeding their voices
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
two gun sid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #88
92. You are right
I am ex-military and that "support the troops" bullshit makes me sick. I support the troops. I just don't believe supporting them means committing them to an illegal war that we can bring nothing but ruin. For us and the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
91. People are missing the best part of the hearing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
93. "political miscalculations,... moral lapses,... fantasy"
(memos based on)


"we believe it is important that these discretions not be shaped by speculation but by how torture is actually used in the world...torture doe not yield credible information.....torture will not be used only against the guilty..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
two gun sid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
94. " Once torture is used it broadens"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
95. round of applause for witnesses so far (from me)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #95
97. 3rd witness
"....I appear today...on gonzales regarding....the clear and absolute illegalities of torture....the non-constitutional powers of a president to override laws against torture...the power does not exist for a president to override those laws...no one is above the law (president) or outside the law (illegal combatants)....gonzales has created the impression that the president lives outside the law..."

torture memo:

"US is committed to a world without torture...how did we move from zero tolerance to where we are now.....the bybee memorandum is the most erroneous ever...." "what memo suggest to do is what saddam himself did and we were against"

"president does not have the constitutional power to override laws on torture"....such a notion was rejected at nuremberg"

"lack of clarity in gonzales' answers..."

"left unchallenged, such thinking can lead to bigger atrocities..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #97
98. 3rd witness cont.
"gonzales memo created a permissible environment for torture..."

"gonzales memo became executive policy...."

"ag has a duty not just to serve his client but to uphold the constitution"

"is the anti-torture constutitonal?...if so, then it cannot be overridden by the president" (question congress should have asked gonzales)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
two gun sid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
96. Hmmm....2000.....who took office after 2000......?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
99. If a meteor was headed to earth and a little 6 year old girl had knowledge
to stop it, is torture acceptable then?"

I stretch the truth....slightly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
two gun sid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #99
100. ROFLMAO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #99
101. "is torture ever acceptable?" ...
witness 3..." no exception to the law...exception creates loophole that waters down into other areas and causes problem..."

No that idiot congresscritter didn't just call that man's answer the "hypothetical answer"...considering his raining bombs scenario...to preface the question of "is torture ever acceptable"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
two gun sid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #101
103. I went to get some soup. Why are they talking about the next
episode of "24"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #103
104. I might have missed that comment while I was screaming at my computer
but hey, I'll get back with you and I look forward to discussing it with you. :)

Seriously, I was screaming
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
102. well damn..don't give them pointers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
105. oh fer goodness sake..stop thanking spector for being chairman
already...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
106. "do you believe prez. has constutitional right to lock up an individual
Edited on Thu Jan-06-05 06:04 PM by Solly Mack
indefinitely"

witness.."no"

"everyone gets hearing to determine status even if not POW's"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
two gun sid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #106
107. Interrogate them don't torture them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #107
108. "they are human beings and we treat them with the respect
Edited on Thu Jan-06-05 06:08 PM by Solly Mack
as human beings...as we would americans..."


heh...gonzales is in never-neverland


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
two gun sid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
109. Bush has really miscalculated
the military is not gonna take this lying down. Bushco blames the soldiers for the torture and the military does not that. Those bastards are gonna get even sooner or later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #109
110. Yeah they will
it's gonna get ugly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
111. boohoo..couldn't get into yale so let me condescend to the dean of yale
law school
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
112. hehe...it's naive...but not you senator...lololol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #112
114. look here you idiot...just because they behave that way doesn't mean we
behave that way...

since when do we measure our standards by terrorists?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #114
115. OMG "lawyers disagree" (so I think torture is OK and you don't)
so you aren't right..you're just stating an opinion..not legal fact (even if it is legal fact)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
two gun sid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #114
118. I just don't get it
I think they want me to believe 9-11 so changed the world that good is bad and bad is good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #118
120. Oh, you get it alright. Cause that's it exactly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
two gun sid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
113. Why do the repugs have such a hard time
understanding: torture is never allowed. If you are not a POW then you a civilian and subject to criminal law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #113
116. cause it ruins their fantasy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
117. what an idiot. I need a drink. Can I sue this fool for chewing my thumb
nail off?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
119. Nener neener mr yale law school dean who wouldn't accept me into yale
I've got legal scholars saying we can torture those al kitties...so there!

course, these same people call Ann Coulter a legal scholar...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #119
122. all done for today?
it's after midnight here (europe)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
two gun sid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #122
124. That's it. Good talkin' to ya
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #124
125. you too!!!
get well soon!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greyfox Donating Member (692 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
121. Just heard....
news said the Repukes don't care what the Demos say --- he is going In!!! Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #121
123. I expected as much
Edited on Thu Jan-06-05 06:28 PM by Solly Mack
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
two gun sid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #121
126. I think they are going to piss the military brass off with this guy
Lookout for leaks denigrating Bushco handling of the war on terror. It started yesterday when some general said that Bushco had broken the reserves and they were no longer effective.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greyfox Donating Member (692 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 08:05 AM
Response to Reply #126
127. Yeah, BUT....
The Shrub has all power right now for some reason -- and it is infuriating as heck!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
two gun sid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #127
128. I know it
but, but Bush is so drunk with power he feels he can do and say anything. He makes enemies everyday. It will be his downfall. History is on our side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greyfox Donating Member (692 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #128
129. Indeed...but...
how many will die before that comes to fruition. 2008 cannot come fast enough to protect us all. The Shrub is so Hitleresque... and his cronies are letting him rule and run.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
two gun sid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #129
130. Many will die.
And that is a great tragedy. But, until we as a people find the moral courage to stand up to this evil my only hope is that Bushco will finally overreach himself.

Don't misunderstand me. I do not think that the military is a white knight. They most definitely are not. It is possible, in my mind, that they would have no problem with taking over this country if threatened. But, until we stand up and say, "How dare you appoint this cheap punk as our chief law officer!" my only hope is factions in the government turn on one and other.

But, I could be all wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
131. eek! this nightmare is back!
I'm still fuming over Gonzales non-answers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adigal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #131
132. How many have they pissed off??
1. The CIA with Porter Goss - not smart to piss off professional spies. Anyone notice how many leaks have been coming out about this president, torture, Gonzales, any and all topics, more so than the whole of the first 4 years.

2. The military - for blatant disregard of the soldiers' safety with regard to torturing our enemy.

3. They have pissed off the FBI, so many retired agents are speaking out about torture they have seen in Guantanamo and other places.

And how long will it be before something comes out about this group that sticks? And the repubs are NOT going to go down for this president. Self-preservation is rule # 1.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #132
133. Gonzales' hearing alone pissed off a motherlode
because he constantly blamed everyone for that torture memo and the torture at Abu Ghraib...but himself or Shrub.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RuleofLaw Donating Member (345 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
134. One thing they never talked about
How do you determine that you are torturing the right guy?

I think thats the whole rationale behind not torturing people. If you have to torture someone for information, you don't know if you have the right person.

They keep saying that if they are Al-Queida then they are not protected. But how the hell do we know if we have the right people?

We don't!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
two gun sid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #134
135. They sure didn't talk about it
They can't justify any of their policy. I found it interesting that they brought up the fact that the insurgents are beheading people. I never heard them mention that the be-headings started after we started torturing prisoners.
This policy is disastrous. The administration is the most wrongheaded and dangerous in history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC