Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Should the Gov't Regulate Fast Food/Restaurant Commercials on TV?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Used and Abused Donating Member (401 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 06:27 PM
Original message
Should the Gov't Regulate Fast Food/Restaurant Commercials on TV?
I'm trying to diet to lose about 20 lbs, and every other commercial I see is involves fast food. It's making me crazy. If smoking commercials were outlawed, then why can't food commercials be, at the very least, minimized? Obesity is an epidemic that has killed millions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
troubleinwinter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yeah, sure. The more regulations on freedom of speech, the better.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. No...and I loathe fast food and have a weight issue, also.
The best answer is to stop watching commercial television. I gave it up for other reasons, but you're right. Every other freakin' ad is for something that's so totally good-looking yet is bad for you AND fails to deliver on what they show you Anyhow.

Turning away from commercial television entirely answers so many different problems, not just fast food commercials.

If it's got ads, I don't want to watch it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. Just some truth would help
At the beginning of the commercial:

"The meal depicted contains 5,250 calories..the recommended caloric intake total for an adult is 1,800 per day....it takes xx minutes of vigorous exercise to burn xxx calories"

or..

like the "hate radio hosts" like to say..."This commercial is for "entertainment purposes only"..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skeptic_All Donating Member (48 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
4. If more people regulated themselves...........
and showed a certain amount of self-restraint, this topic would be moot. Now come on..........the American people are collectively some of the most well informed people on this earth as far as what is good for you and what is bad. There is no question that a diet of Big Macs and Whoppers is not the best thing in the world for you so moderation here is the key. Is one Big Mac a month bad? Of course not. Two? Probably not. The American people have, over the last twenty to thirty years, changed their eating habits to the point where preparing the home cooked meal has been supplanted and in some cases replaced by the restaurant. As long as tasty treats like MacDonald's, Wendy's and Burger King remain within the American people's budget, they will continue to flock to these places, waistline be damned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Hi Skeptic_All!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Wolf_Moderate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
5. Tell me, why should I give up my freedom of speech rights,
because you can't control yourself? To answer your question directly, no. The government shouldn't regulate commercials, be they smoking, fast food, or otherwise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
6. With all due respect, this kind of thinking is what gives ammunition to
the right.

I agree with your underlying concern, but this is exactly the kind of "mommy" shit we get lambasted about.

And then there's the minor issue of free speech.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrWeird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Yeah, he knows.
He's being sarcastic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pdxmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. I agree that there shouldn't be regulation
But I don't think the Repubs have any ammunition from the "mommy" stuff with regards to TV/Radio. They are the ones that want to tell us what we should be watching and the limits on the airwaves are getting worse and worse because of them.

I hate censorship!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
devilgrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
8. No. However, you're welcome to ignore them.
Or read 'Fast Food Nation', you'll never touch that shit again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrWeird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
9. No.
Unless those restaurants are purposely publishing false data on the nutritional content of their products; e.g. saying their burger had 120 grams of fat when it actually has 180 grams of fat. As a recent lawsuit alledged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AgadorSparticus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
11. absolutely not. gov't needs to do LESS censoring. too much of it
already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MergeLeft Donating Member (17 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
12. No, but maybe fast food places should be required to
post the nutritional values of their offerings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sugarbleus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
13. No.
Stop the food police, please! Show some self control. I would like to see an end to military recruiting ads though...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InvisibleBallots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
15. I say unionize all the fast food places
A union workplace will take health and safety issues seriously and maybe they can force management to make their food at least edible and not poisonous. That would be a start.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
16. Absolutely
They need to be banned from all childrens' programming. Period.

Of course, the media whores will fight tooth and nail against it- as they would against removing misleading prescription drug advertising.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC