Tansy_Gold
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-10-05 12:36 PM
Original message |
I'm looking for a definition of "hate speech" re LTE |
|
A letter was recently published in my local newspaper which appeared to me to advocate violence against people who don't believe in Christmas, don't celebrate Christmas, and/or write LTEs supporting separation of church and state. Leading up to the holidays, there had been a number of letters printed regarding Christmas-specific decorations put up at taxpayer expense, more or less along the lines of the general discussion here on DU.
However, this more recent letter included this line --
"Those who attempt to discredit all that has been a part of our lives for over 200 years are nothing more then /sic/ the discontented who along with their ideological views should spend Christmas at the bottom of a septic tank."
My question -- does anyone think this might constitute "hate speech?"
Tansy Gold, wondering
|
Hello_Kitty
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-10-05 12:40 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Well it's definitely hateful and NOT a very Christian sentiment |
forgethell
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-10-05 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
I don't think it qualifys as "hate speech" any more than some of the metaphorical speaking that we do on DU does. Sounds like someone blowing off a little steam.
|
lectrobyte
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-10-05 12:40 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Sounds like hate speech to me. |
ArkDem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-10-05 12:43 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Yes. Hate speech is anything we disagree with. |
asjr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-10-05 12:44 PM
Response to Original message |
4. These days anything that comes out of the mouths |
|
of the administration and most Republicans should be termed Hate Speech. Never has this country been so divided since the Civil War.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat Apr 20th 2024, 12:03 AM
Response to Original message |