MsTryska
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-10-05 03:43 PM
Original message |
|
this year i've decided i'm going to stop living paycheck to paycheck and start saving and investing some money. I wrote out a 5-year plan and everything.
Does anybody here use ethical investing to make money?
if so how do you go about doing it?
right now, i'm just flipping stuff into a short term CD, until i have a decent amount, but then when i do, i think i want to put it into a mutual fund. soemthing easily liquidatable, but at the same itme, i don't want to give my money to evil corporations that are raping natural reseources and indigenous people.
|
AllegroRondo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-10-05 03:47 PM
Response to Original message |
1. There are mutual funds that specialize in this |
|
so you don't have to do a ton of research
|
DinahMoeHum
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-10-05 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
6. You can get a list of these funds thru Co-op America/Social Invest |
|
www.socialinvest.org
Good luck and good hunting.
:smoke:
|
MsTryska
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-10-05 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
|
I've just been looking at the Parnassus Fund and the Domini Social Index.
it's good to know there are funds out there that are doing this sort of thing. makes it easier than trying to cherry pick on my own.
|
K-W
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-10-05 03:48 PM
Response to Original message |
2. I always see ads in progressive publications |
|
for ethical mutual funds. Might want to grab a mother jones or something.
|
sui generis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-10-05 03:53 PM
Response to Original message |
|
is very difficult to do successfully. It's almost an oxymoron.
If you understand that most of the operating costs of companies are in regulatory and compliance issues after payroll, then companies who are willing to break the law, re-write the law, or keep headcount and salaries low or outsourced are going to show the best earnings profiles and the best returns on investments.
"Ethical" investing is sadly a riskier strategy, and nothing you invest in as a little guy should be risky.
On the other hand, you can do good with your investments. When you are a shareholder, vote. Write to the board, get involved however you can. Help change it from the inside. Realize that things aren't always black and white - some corporations are providing jobs and higher than median incomes to people who would otherwise be unemployed. Yin and yang - they're doing it at the cost of American jobs. Investigate your mutual funds if you go that route - be comfortable with your choices. There is no ultimate "good" without a balancing "evil" somewhere else, most especially in a successful business.
|
K-W
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-10-05 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. Being a shareholder means very little. |
|
You dont really get a say at all.
Generally with progressive mutual funds, the idea is to apply certain labor/enviroment/etc standards and only invest in corporations that meet the standards.
If you want to be ethically perfect, you really shouldnt invest at all, but only investing in corporations that meet certain standards is a good start I suppose.
|
MsTryska
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-10-05 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
8. Can one be ethicallly perfect and actually become rich too? |
|
my mom and i were having this conversation yesterday, we both decided that was a negatory.
|
K-W
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-10-05 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
9. Probably not, but it depends on your ethics. |
|
I cant really imagine a reasonable ethical system that wouldnt condemn amassing great wealth, but alot of people try hard enough that they think they have.
|
MsTryska
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-10-05 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
10. I don't get that tho? |
|
why would it be unethical to amass great wealth? (provided you didn't amass it at the expense of others, and that you willingly give to others as well)
there's nothing inherently wrong with being rich, i don't think.
|
K-W
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-10-05 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
11. There certainly is. There cannot be rich people without poor people. |
|
Money doesnt grow on trees. It represents commodities and work. Let me give you a hint, if you a rich, you didnt do most of the work that went into the value of the money. Someone else did do that work, and they didnt get full value in return. And if your wealth is inherited, a similar transaction happened in the past.
When you have the opportunity to get things you dont deserve, the ethical thing to do is to not take it.
|
MsTryska
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-11-05 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #11 |
20. I fundamentally disagree. |
|
Everything has duality.
jsut as without darkness there is no light.
I can't subscribe to keeping everybody at one level where we're all poor. or fair to middling.
what's the point of that? that's a hopeless situation.
|
K-W
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-11-05 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #20 |
22. Not letting people starve is not keeping everyone on the same level. |
|
It is about a level playing field and giving people a wage that matches the value of thier work, not the lowest wage the market will allow.
Being successful and being rich are two different things. There is nothing wrong with a system that rewards hard work. There is something wrong with a system that isnt even close to merit based where a small minority reaps the lionshare of the reward for the work done by the whole nation.
|
MsTryska
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-11-05 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #22 |
23. That i can agree with. |
|
I must have misunderstood your initial comments.
|
AllegroRondo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-10-05 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
13. Or take it one step further |
|
buy stock in companies that don't meet your standards, then go to the shareholder meetings and speak about it. Bring up your ideas and get constructive on making changes.
|
K-W
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-10-05 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
14. stockholders have very little power |
AllegroRondo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-10-05 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
17. True, but you do get to go to the shareholder meetings |
|
most companies require that any shareholder that wishes to address the meeting must be given a limited amount of time to speak, which is more of a voice than the average person gets.
|
thoughtanarchist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-10-05 03:54 PM
Response to Original message |
|
is a recommended practice for investing.
starting with index funds and / or index-based ETFs and slowly moving into the arena of individual stocks.
When you are at the point where you feel ready to buy individual stocks, (when you have your safety net saved up, you have your 401K near max, you have paid off all revolving debt, and you still have enough disposable income to invest), then use your favorite books, guides, and other info to screen for solid balance sheets first, then check out the best prospects on buyblue or some such to see if the corp. is worthy of your support.
|
sweetheart
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-10-05 04:33 PM
Response to Original message |
12. invest in what you can touch |
|
Like other posters mention, its an oxymoron, as the very principals of the financial products you would invest in, support the wall street takeover of finance... when if you look at the behaviour of the wall street rich themselves, they've left that lot behind, and are in to private equity in a big way. (wall street talk for doing investments directly with businesses, and cutting out the stock markets and all the hubub of sarbanes oxley (the accounting stupid law that gives accounting consultants extra pork after the enron/worldcom crimes).
You can as well invest yourself in property location location.... , shifting an inventory on Ebay, or fixing up derelict properties for resale. Even if you put the word out, perhaps spreading some investment around directly to businesses that are forming in your area as "private equity". Otherwise, you are a speculator, an economic agent that wants the horse to magically make you money by someone else slaving to do the work.... so the ethics of economic feudalism being what they are, its quite sad what some ethical investing gets to.
Its no irony, that the wall street pro's are big on going directly to the source and forming a massive growth in firms like carlysle, that take the capitalist surplus and invest it directly in things they can touch. Even warren buffet famously has avoided virtual business for pragmatic things he could touch... it seems a wise maxim from the pros.
Gold, oil and some other value-holding commodities will surely appreciate the whole time the AWOL gang is running around "spreading democracy with death squads".
Good luck... caveat emptor buyer beware... may the gods favour you with clear vision and a stiff wind. :-)
|
oneold1-4u
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-10-05 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
|
They have some investments in the US but they will still be around when the US $ will cost you 2 Canadian. Australia or the URO also against US failure caused by corporation financial fraud. Remember the old saying that you can have it all but you can't keep it dusted! When it is dirty enough, you won't find it in the muck.
|
MsTryska
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-11-05 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #15 |
19. I've been thinking about investing in |
|
the socialists actually. the dollars very weak right now, and it might help me not take too much of a bath with the "play" money. (ie retirement money - i've got 30 years yet, so i can afford to be risky with that)
|
fob
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-10-05 05:12 PM
Response to Original message |
16. I have a 401k to roll over and was looking for a similar thing, I was |
|
Edited on Mon Jan-10-05 05:12 PM by fob
looking for progressive investing. So far I've come across Portfolio 21 (www.portfolio21.com). Still checking it out.
NOTE: FOB does not endorse or currently use portfolio21, it is presented merely for informational purposes only. Your mileage may vary. Any similarity to any entity living or dead is purely coincidental. Contents may have shifted during shipping. Advice given by weight, not volume.
Thank you
|
MsTryska
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-11-05 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #16 |
|
Domini and Parnassus too.
I'm kinda digging on Domini at the moment, because they have an index fund.
|
Technocrat058
(23 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-11-05 10:05 AM
Response to Original message |
21. Soon you may not even be taxed! |
|
If the new regulations get passed by the administration the taxes on investments and savings may be a thing of the past.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:05 PM
Response to Original message |