Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CBS' downfall is just the tip of the iceberg: ........

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
MsUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-05 11:34 AM
Original message
CBS' downfall is just the tip of the iceberg: ........
http://msnbc.msn.com/id/6813945/ Bush doesn't hate the AMMP (indeed, he likes his share of reporters on a personal basis). He just refuses to care about what it's up to. The terrorist attack of 9/11, and the added security concerns it fueled, have given the White House a new reason to keep the AMMP at bay. Pools are "tighter," more and more events are "closed press," and those that are open are to be viewed at a distance, if at all.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CottonBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-05 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
1. A guest on C-Span said that they don't ask *
questions that they know he will not answer. So those important questions will never get asked here in the US and * knows it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-05 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. Maybe they should make a report on the kind of questions that Bush
won't answer?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CottonBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-05 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. That is a very good idea!
Are there any DU journalists out there willing to make a list? As a protest, we could ask them at a mock press conference! It's a thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-05 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Or give them to Jon Stuart.
He can recite the question and we can see Bush's reaction. I'm sure there will be an impatient sigh caught on tape eventually.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
King Coal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-05 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
2. I am sick to my stomach.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
otohara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-05 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. Stop Eating
Spam
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
King Coal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-05 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. SPAM is nector of the Gods.
Squirrel, Possum, and Mouse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-05 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
3. Yet another "good" result of 9/11.
Good for Bush & Co, that is.

How convenient...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoStinkinBadges Donating Member (99 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-05 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
4. American Mainstream Media Party?
What is Howard talking about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lectrobyte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-05 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. he made it up as a figure of speech
AMMP (the American Mainstream Media Party)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guns Aximbo Donating Member (324 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-05 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
5. yeah!
The fascists government that has taken over America has given an ultimatum to the media. Fall in line or else. They are imprisoning journalists that don't fall in line, They're firing journalist that don't fall in line and they are paying journalist to spew their propaganda.

They are withholding the right of free speech to the citizens of the United State of America and I won't stand for it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Syncronaut Seven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-05 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
6. You'll remember, Reagan had the press
on a pretty tight leash too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-05 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
8. This article is ridiculous...
There is no such thing as 'objective' and never has been.

The point-of-view journalists should always take is one of the eyes & ears of the people -- to defend the interests of the people from the interests of the powerful. This is why we know that Cronkite & Rather's actions made them good journalists. This is how we know that 'conservative' outlets feature celebrities instead of journalists - they do not represent the people, they communicate the propaganda of the powerful.

Finally, while the current environment is leading toward different groups getting news from completely separate sources (which will polarize groups in the short run) eventually people will be able to determine which outlets are reporting something-close-to-reality and which are pandering to the powerful.

:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-05 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
9. Slimeman as usual, takes what could be an insightful article and in the
end turns it into something blaming CBS for Bush and the RWings dominance of the AMMP.

He's very clever in the way he writes. I stopped reading him because he manages to slither himself very carefully through criticisms of a subject always turning the blame in the end towards anyone but the Bushes.

This article started off so differently, I thought I'd check it out. And sure enough...after pointing out that Cronkite and Rather made a difference in Vietnam War and Watergate he then blames them for dismantling the AMMP (mainstream press coalition)by speaking out. So, in effect he's talking out of both sides of his mouth. He finishes the article off blaming Rather and CBS and the internet Bloggers for AWOLGATE.

He also gives "veiled" praise to Rove for the direct mail campaigns that have bilked millions of seniors out of money with their "Medicare Scares," "Save Jesus Scares" and all the rest of the stuff that comes out of the Ridenour Powerhouse Direct Mail Machine there in Virginia. Notice he mentions their activities but doesn't really talk about them bilking Americans while they spread disinformation and lies.

He ends the article with "...woe is Me....who ARE we to believe these days..now that we no longer have the AMMP." (my paraphrase of his close).

Just another example of the media weasels..doing their work for the Corporate Whores. No wonder he's a favorite of Tweety Twist in the Wind... I wonder how these people sleep at night. There consciences must be kept very comfy by personal pleasures.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpaceCatMeetsMars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-05 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
11. Wolcott has got something on this already
http://jameswolcott.com/

What a great way with words he has. Ouch!

snip

"When you see how gullibly the media swallowed the lies and claims from the Bush administration and their neocon mouthpieces about WMDs in Iraq, it's pretty damned hard to accept the notion that the Media Party suffers from an excess of prosecutorial zeal, and that we're all better off with the ghost of Edward R. Murrow finally being sucked into the ventilator so that reporters can resume a more modest role shining Karl Rove's shoes."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC