Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

John Stewart last night

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
rwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-05 09:52 AM
Original message
John Stewart last night
Showed clip of AWOL holding his Town Hall meeting to discuss Soc Sec.John mentioned that this was a hand picked crowd.Awol was his usual stumbling self when he does'nt have his tele prompter.He talked to an Afro American next to him and said A.A.'s don't live as long as white people so they would really get a big benifit by being able to invest a portion of their S.S.early in life.It is amazing that you never see these @$#% up's on network tv.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LiberalEsto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-05 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. Call it "censored tv"
instead of "network tv." That's a way of reframing it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-05 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. Good framing! "Censored TV" - I love it and will use it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-05 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
2. re: black men not collecting Soc Sec.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gordianot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-05 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. Awful negligence and abuse.
Who says Repub's are not savvy to Social Engineering?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdhunter Donating Member (373 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-05 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
3. A semi related note
A recent study about the true cost of smoking, per pack, had to take into account ways in which smoking actually benefitted society.

The authors were forced to conclude that since smokers die earlier, and don't draw as many payments, their social security contributions were a net gain for society.

If I recall smoking still cost over $10 a pack though. The principle is the same, die young, help the rest of us out. That doesn't excuse his saying so on national TV, however, especially in the context of race, and especially in the context of race when the system you're selling is a lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grumpy old fart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-05 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Off the subject, but I never thought the tobacco companies should have ...
Edited on Thu Jan-13-05 10:03 AM by grumpy old fart
folded their tents so fast when several states sued them. Lost in the added health care costs the states sought to recover was the fact that the states collected billions of dollars in "sin" taxes on the cigs, and were complicit in the distribution......in addition to the early death savings you cite...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdhunter Donating Member (373 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-05 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Ooooh, state's complicity, I like that.
I'd never thought about their revenue stream and the interest they might have had to keep it going.

I had thought that states awarded settlements, like NC, that made the growing and processing of tobacco a main industry were at least somewhat duplicitous in that regard. They didn't seem to mind killing other people so long as it provided jobs, but once the jobs started to dwindle, suddenly the health of North Carolians was of grave concern.

I have a small violin around here somewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grumpy old fart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-05 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
4. And the poor guy sitting next to *....
looked like, "I have no idea what you're trying to say. But, can I have $240,000 to promote it?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
In Truth We Trust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-05 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
9. Lewis Black "Back in Black" Rocks!
he did a piece on the 1/6 challenge which was quite funny and more than overdue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skypilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-05 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
10. African-Americans aren't going to live as long...
...so they might as well blown their hard-earned money on the stock market.:eyes: Dickhead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-05 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
11. I don't understand
What does Bush mean? Is Bush suggesting that young people who put their money into privatized accounts would be allowed to withdraw it at a younger age than they would be able to draw on Social Security? Does he mean that a person who dies before the official age for drawing on Social Security will "own" the money in a private account and be able to bequeath it to someone else?

Bush plans to borrow money to fund the privatization. Where does he propose to get the money to pay back that money? From the profits of the privatized accounts? What if there aren't any, or not enough? From increased payroll deductions into the system? If so, why bother with privatization? Why not just increase the payroll deductions and cover the Social Security shortfall that Bush is predicting? Has Bush explained how he is going to pay back the money borrowed to fund his privatization plan?

Compare Bush's plan to a life insurance policy. Most policies don't pay anything if you die before the age at which the policy matures. Policies that pay cash if you live beyond that date cost a lot of money. Has Bush thought this through at all?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllyCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-05 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. He doesn't have to pay back that money.
By the time it's time to pay the piper, he will be long gone and the American people will forget about it as it just becomes part of the anonymous bubble called the national debt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC