Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Prediction: "We sacrifice for Iraqis" turns to "F*em" in three weeks

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-05 11:53 AM
Original message
Prediction: "We sacrifice for Iraqis" turns to "F*em" in three weeks
Edited on Thu Jan-13-05 11:59 AM by Inland
The only remaining Bush justification for the Iraq war--that we are engaged in a totally selfless sacrifice for Iraqis and democracy--is worth about two cents with your average American.

The Bush stance declaring we are sacrificing our lives and money for Iraqis is inconsistent with the more prevalent American attitude, born of the Bushite confusion of Iraq with 9/11, that Iraq is a den of terrorists and therefore destroying a few cities in the manner we destroyed Fallujah is what is needed for security and, more importantly, for revenge and sending a message to the Muslim world that we don't mind killing civilians and laying waste in ME. The Bushites all thought the sacrifice line was a lie told to the world in order to justify continued fighting with an enemy. Like all Bush supporters, the pro war crowd knew Bush was lying, but for the sake of war. But since we aren't winning, even the Bushites want out now.

Expect the US to declare victory after the election, to announce democracy and stability firmly in place, and to bug out as quickly as possible. Then when Iraq falls on its face, well, Bush did everything right and handed Iraqis democracy on a platter, and Iraqis screwed it up, and it is their fault, so f*em.

The Bush oft repeated linestatement that the road to peace and stability in the ME is through a democratic Iraq will simply disappear from Bush speeches and policy statements. The war will be a noble attempt--well, if you want to know what the Bushites will say about Iraq, look up what they say about Vietnam. Those veterans who try to tell the truth will be branded antiAmerican. The failure will be blamed on you and me and France, because of our opposition to the war, Bush couldn't do everything he wanted. We know the drill.

You must pay me one dollar if this prediction comes true.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
shoelace414 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-05 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. "We can't cut and run"
but we will before the end of the year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-05 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. See, I think the "election" is when we declare victory
and everything that happens after that is the fault of the independent, sovereign Iraqi government.

There isn't going to be another event that allows us to declare victory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressiveBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-05 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. I'm hoping this election will be covered by the MSM
And when voter turnout hovers around %10-15, the world will see that even that excuse is a sham. I'm hoping...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-05 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. We'll do just that and call it "victory."
It isn't about what is true, it is all about how it is spun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RobertSeattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-05 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Just change the definition of cut and run and Bush has his out
These jokes changed the definition of torture, "cutting and running" will be easy for them, and the RW pundits will just chime right in.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fertilizeonarbusto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-05 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
2. Very shrewd post
Unfortunately, the hornets' nest we'll be leaving in Iraq will destabilize the whole region.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-05 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
4. W et al are sounding like a bunch of hippies now aren't they?
Hey man let's bring them peace and love and liberty okay man?

Very good post Inland. Bookmarking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
susu369 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-05 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
26. Sounding like characters out of Duck Soup
Chico - "It's all your fault. Now we gotta steal the plans
again -- You had 'em on you..... you take a bath.... and
now we no gotta plans of war."

:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RobertSeattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-05 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
6. Not a bad prediction
And look at all the great prediction from the BushAdmin

1. We'll be greeted as liberators. (not)
2. The dead-enders will quit a few weeks after Baghdad falls. (not)
3 Disbanding the Iraqi Military will prevent an uprising.
4. The insurgency will end once Saddam is caught (not)
5. The insurgency will end now that Iraq has an interim government (not)
7. The insurgency will end once the elections occur Jan 30th. (...)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-05 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
7. Depends on the definition of "Iraqi"
Is an insurgent an Iraqi? Are "The terrorists and Saddam loyalists" Iraqi? Are the 100,000 civilians Bush killed Iraqi? According to BushCo they're not even human, let alone Iraqi citizens. We've been saying "f*ck them" for years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPoet64 Donating Member (897 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-05 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
9. Admitting "No WMD's" means * is preparing to cut and run . . .
Edited on Thu Jan-13-05 12:08 PM by GreenPoet64
Remember many RW's still think we just haven't located those missing WMD's and that we can't pull out of Iraq until we do. Hmmmmm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trogdor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-05 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
11. "We sacrifice for Iraqis" was astroturf.
...with which FReepers were supposed to challenge liberals and other assorted anti-war people and keep them quiet. Once the Free Republic chorus gets orders to stop chanting this chorus, we will be suddenly more comfortable with "cut and run."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-05 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Yes, it was the one excuse for war that liberals would consider
even though most of the pro war crowd thought it was bullshit made to sell the war. But even the pro war crowd isn't interested in selling it anymore. Time to declare democracy and get out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moodforaday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-05 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
12. It's F*ck 'em already, has been from day one
The Guardian is running a bloodcurdling story by an Iraqi doctor who visited Falluja briefly after the assault subsided.

Here's a choice bit:

Fallujans are suspicious of outsiders, so I found it surprising when Nihida Kadhim, a housewife, beckoned me into her home. She had just arrived back in the city to check out her house; the government had told the people three days earlier that they should start going home. She called me into her living room. On her mirror she pointed to a message that had been written in her lipstick. She couldn't read English. It said: "Fuck Iraq and every Iraqi in it!"

"They are insulting me, aren't they?" she asked.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,1387460,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-05 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. That wasn't the Bush excuse
The Bush justification was that we had to save Iraqis, do it for them. It isn't consistent with the warmongers desire to just kill a bunch of somebody over there. And that sort of self sacrifice goes over like a lead balloon, and I think the Bush supporters just considered it a lie for cover for a punitive occupation.

Now that the occupation is a failure, even the Bush supporters who wanted a punitive war want out.

With the election, Bush will declare Iraq free, democratic and victorious, and then bug out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femme.democratique Donating Member (969 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-05 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
15. This is the one reason why we WONT cut and run
Oil, pure and simple. We don't yet have supreme control of their oil reserves. All other reasons are secondary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-05 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. But we can't control the oil. We may have wanted to, but we can't.
That much is clear. Turns out it is easier to stop it from flowing than steal it.

So the people who saw an opportunity to at least have the oil pay for the war have lost interest. They too are ready to bug out the second Bush declares victory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femme.democratique Donating Member (969 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-05 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. I doubt it is that simple...
...given that the real motive for this war was economic, ie Bush/Cheney wanted to make money for Halliburton, etc, using the military as their means to do so. I think the morons in charge will extend the bulk of the deployment until their opportunity for $$$ dries up. Oh, sure, you'll see alot of to-do about decreasing troop levels at a very superficial level, but we'll continue to maintain a strong military presence there for years to come to protect American economic interests.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-05 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #18
25. I think that the moment has come....
Fact is, if Bush doesn't declare victory at elections at the end of the month, when? Even the neocons have no taste for Iraq status quo, and nobody thinks things are going to improve mightily for years and years.

I suppose Bush could stay for a year, or two, or three, but if he does, and things aren't any better, then how does he bring our guys home? EG, he says in February, "Too much violence, must stay." Then next February, same level of violence. What then?

Fact is, Bush doesn't give a crap about Iraq and isn't interested in what happens, as long as he isn't blamed. Halliburton has had a good run, and Bush will have another boondoggle for them soon. The people that will continue to suffer is the Iraqis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flobee1kenobi Donating Member (302 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-05 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. We don't yet have supreme control of their oil reserves
At the rate the pipelines are being sabotaged-we never will.
the pipelines will continue to explode until * gets bored and leaves.
The Iraqi people are sucessfully destroying the pipelines to save them, and bushco knows this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #17
29. All your oil are belong to U.S. All your choice contracts are belong to
U.S. All your important decisions are belong to U.S. As per Paul Bremer, head dictator and chief bottle washer.

www.haarp.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stirk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-05 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
19. Our military isn't leaving Iraq anytime soon.
The fake elections this month are just window dressing and PR. I'm sure the neocons would love to pass the "peace keeping" duties over to the Iraqi puppet government, but they can't handle it.

Our glorious leaders went into Iraq to get a strategic foothold in the region and to gain control of Iraq's oil. They've got it. They aren't going to let go of it now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rockerdem Donating Member (706 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-05 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. Youve got it right -- they are going to kick Sunni ass but baaaaad
Youre 100% right about the real reasons for going to Iraq, not the stated window dressing. They are going to rationalize Sunni violence after the election as ingratitude, and beat the hell out of them. They will have help from the Shiites (& maybe the Kurds). And militarily its doable -- the Sunnis are both hapless and helpless. Look for a lot of citations of Lincoln and Truman to justify ruthlessness.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catmandu57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-05 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
20. We won't be going anywhere
we've hit the tarbaby, and like it or not as long as the neoconvicts and endtimers control things we're fucking stuck.
Of course these election are nothing but a fraud and a farce, pr for the amerikan people, a feeble attempt at fooling bubba, but the veil is slowly falling away.
Support for these idiots will melt, like ice cream in the August sun, and we'll reclaim our country.

Even if there is a draw down, that's an open invitation for the terror to come home. We've fucked their world up good, these people want to kill amerikans, leaving a token force there is a suicide mission.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lectrobyte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-05 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
22. We'll cut & run, but we'll keep our 14 bases
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-05 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. Yeah, maybe. I guess that we are going to have to be sufficiently
engaged so that Bush can't be blamed when Iraq fails, but that might include hiding within bases out in the desert.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diamond14 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-05 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
23. America will leave Iraq PROUDLY, just like we left Vietnam (PHOTOS)

"APRIL 1975....America PROUDLY leaves Vietnam"....after winning their hearts and minds...with the biggest and the best military weapons in the world, full attacks with chemical, biological, and aerial bombardment, napalm, agent orange, and more....in the end, it was total defeat by a third-world country that had no air force or navy...beat by 'low-tech' weapons....












North Vietnamese troops run across the tarmac of Tan Son Nhat air base in Saigon as smoke billows behind abandoned U.S. Air Force transport planes on April 30, 1975.

Sad...America ran SO FAST...we abandoned even our Air Force planes...



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-05 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. I have a client who was there in Saigon,
says he is in one of the famous photos, cause he recognized himself by the Navy dungarees he was wearing (he was Navy acting as a Marine Corpsman, the only one in Navy dungarees that day). He said his Mom knew he was there, told him on the phone when he got to the Phillipines that she was so proud of him helping those poor Vietnamese escape. He said he never had the courage to tell her that his biggest concern was the small arms fire he could hear, and that he was working to keep the crowds between himself and the battle in order to catch any stray bullets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
28. Of course I agree with you.
Edited on Fri Jan-14-05 08:13 PM by David Zephyr
I've said the same thing. Bush is scrambling for an excuse to get us out and that's the reason we now see Snowcroft and Baker running the idea of exiting quickly up the flag to prepare the public for Bush's cutting and running and leaving a civil war behind.

How funny that Bush will wind up doing exactly what Dennis Kucinich was advocating, huh? The only difference is that Kucinich would correctly call it a defeat while Bush will declare "victory".

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x2948396
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-05 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #28
32. That's right--the difference is that Bush has to end it with a lie
in order to save his ass.

And of course, while telling the truth might win respect and some acknowledgement that we aren't all idiots and insane, Bush has to go the other way, therefby implicitly informing the world that not only is the US satisfied with sort-of election in lieu of democracy and a low level civil war in lieu of peace, but heck, we would do it again in a heartbeat in any other country you want to name. No regrets. Except some undiplomatic language.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
30. It's because Amurkans ate too many French fries.... it gave solace to
the enemy and their supporters. This whole frigging nightmare is such a crock of sh*t and we all knew it was going to be one over two freaking years ago. What do we get... there must be a prize for the people who are miles smarter than the pResident.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alexisfree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
31. Bring them on huh bush??? hahahahahah you sicko
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 05:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC