Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Democrats just lost a good Senator!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
CoffeePlease1947 Donating Member (621 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-03 08:55 PM
Original message
Democrats just lost a good Senator!
John Edwards says he will not seek re-election to the Senate and will focus on his Presidential race. I am upset about this. I really think he should have stayed in the senate. Now he will be neither. He has no chance at President and little chance of being a VP. This will most likely lead to a Republican gaining that seat in NC.


Mike
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Brucey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-03 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. yeah,
I don't know much about that state, but I think you are right. Too bad, wrong decision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chimpymustgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-03 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. I trust Edwards' instincts.
Edited on Sun Sep-07-03 09:03 PM by chimpymustgo
This is man who has come from nothing, to build a career, a fortune, a family - using his God-given talents - nothing else. No trust fund, no inheritance, no safety net.

I'll support his decision.



edited for spelling
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terwilliger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-03 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. ACK!!!
He should have done the opposite
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wrkclskid Donating Member (579 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-03 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. I like him
But he prob would not get re-elected to his seat, polls had him losing to Burr by 10%, it's part of N.C. politics from what I understand, they don't like heir representatives jetting off to run for national office, but the good news is it gives Bowles a chance to start running, he is their best chance to keep a souhern seat, especially if Graham and Breaux retire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemPopulist Donating Member (446 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-03 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. What polls??
Cite
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wrkclskid Donating Member (579 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-03 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. Admittedly I can not
But this summer in DC I read every issue of roll call and the Hill I could (I am a dork I know) and the campaign news cited several polls, mainly from local news outletts, the had him losing. One of them was cited on "Inside Politics" as well. I don't have them on me now, so I ask u to trust me, thoguh I undersand ur skepticism due to my inability to produce them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chimpymustgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-03 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. I'm pretty sure the most recent polls had Edwards leading Burr.
He could have won re-election. I think he believes Bowles can win, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wrkclskid Donating Member (579 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-03 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. well no use splitting hairs
I hope you're right :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemPopulist Donating Member (446 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-03 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #13
26. Most recent poll showed him up 8 over Burr
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KeepItReal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-03 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. There may be a cabinet post in his future?
If we have 1 fair election left in '04.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-03 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Atty. General...replacing Asshat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
carpetbagger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-03 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. Spitzer's the only one for that position.
He's been doing for years now what Ashcroft won't regarding prosecuting securities fraud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nannygoat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-03 06:58 AM
Response to Reply #17
45. Maybe Spitzer would be great as head of SEC?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeePlease1947 Donating Member (621 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-03 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. I Hope so, hate to lose him completely
But still, he was our best shot to keep that seat. They are not going to vote for Bowls (sorry on spelling). I think Burr will win for sure now.

Mike
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-03 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
6. Sad
His lack of experience definetly needed that position longer.

I hope the Dems can think of a good NC replacement, we need the (d).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheswick2.0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-03 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
8. ooops you got it backwards John
Forget it John, you are not going to be Pres and now you aren't going to be a senator either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
poskonig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-03 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
10. Do'h!
This really sucks. We need as many good people in the Senate right now as possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-03 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
11. Why doesn't he do both like Lieberman did?
I don't think he will be elected President so he will retain his Senate seat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-03 12:23 AM
Response to Reply #11
38. If he did win the Presidency while running for Senator we lose a seat
This way, we have a decent chance of retaining that seat. It's a bold and noble move, and what's more, he's doing it in a timely and honorable fashion.

It's showing what he's made of, and it's a commanding move.

The conspiracy of the right and the right-controlled media, along with the factional derision from other Dem candidates has kept him in the dark in a very frustrating way. Boldness is actually prudence in this case, and he has every right to do it. Beyond that, he's doing this on his own terms, instead of "doubling down" or "playing the field" or however else you want to describe it. This is not a selfish move.

Dems have to stop cowering with the assumption driven into our collective heads that we don't really deserve to exist or have any power positions and should just take what we can get. Should he fail, he's still a very viable future statesman; with any sense from the permanently disorganized left, he will be a man for the ages yet.

Decisiveness is good: it's a sign of executive mentality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-03 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
14. Undoubtedly a man with a parachute
he must have 8 offers to be VP!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-03 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
15. I read this in LBN and I thought Edwards was making a mistake
You should only make such commitment when you have a fighting chance at the nomination. Edwards has no such chance, trailing Gephardt in many polls.

This is a mistake that will bring to an untimely end a promising career in politics.

PS: Edwards would be my choice to replace John Ashcroft as AG.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
poskonig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-03 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Perhaps he only became Senator to run for president.
Confusing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wrkclskid Donating Member (579 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-03 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. That is possible
Considering how quickly he sarted running, it is almost unheard off to run for President afer only 4 years in elected office, yet a good asset he still was he will be missed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-03 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
16. Sorry to See Him Go, I Love ALL Dems n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mb7588a Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-03 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
22. edwards
He's very young, very talented. I wouldn't count him out for 2008, 2012 etc. He is very definitely VP material.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-03 06:28 AM
Response to Reply #22
40. Hi mb7588a!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-03 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
23. He is definitely Kerry's 1st VP choice now
I had heard this to be the case but this confirms it. I think blm has said this here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newsguyatl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-03 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
24. i hate to see this
as well, but i knew it was coming...

i like edwards, i really, honestly do. but the best he can hope for is a cabinet position in the new democratic administration.

the good side to all this is, of course, that north carolinians will have a DAMN fine choice for a senator in erskine bowles. he's brilliant, and i feel confident he can beat burrrr :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemPopulist Donating Member (446 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-03 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
25. You say he has no chance
He's leading (albeit narrowly) in SC, a point behind the much-better known Gephardt and Lieberman in NH and tied with Gephardt for fourth-place nationwide in the last CNN-Time poll, with most of the major candidates bunched together in a relatively narrow range.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tjdee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-03 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
27. Edwards just can't catch a break with you people, can he?
Edited on Sun Sep-07-03 09:16 PM by tjdee
Not only does he not have a chance to be the nominee, but he has "little chance" of being VP? What? Care to back that up?

You know, to hear you people talk, everyone but Dean or Clark should just pack it up and go home. Guess what, doesn't work like that MONTHS BEFORE THE PRIMARIES EVEN START. Things change every day. If Edwards' presidential campaign doesn't pan out, he would be an extremely good candidate for VP, and NOBODY knows what is going to happen. At any rate, I'm so sure DU is going to be crying tears about he and his poor family. :eyes:

Edwards' seat is the tricky seat in NC, hasn't stayed in one party more than a term ever since...Sam Nunn? left it. So chances are, yeah, he might have lost his seat, and I heard that almost every day at DU. It's a hell of a lot harder seat to fight for than Kerry's or Kucinich's, or Gephardt's, or even Graham's. All the people who were bitching about how he "couldn't even" hold on to his senate seat, well there you go. Now North Carolina has plenty time to find someone else to run for the seat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-03 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. agree
before people were complaining about him being "indecisive" or not serious about the senate seat and kept pushing for him to make a decision to either run for senate or president RIGHT NOW. and now that he does say he will focus on presidential run leaving senate seat open early on with lots of time for democrats to make their decision there are people complaining about him leaving it. and also, why can't he run for president ? bill clinton was about the same place as him , maybe with even less su pport at this time. the guy hasn't even announced yet. and edwards is a VERY good choice for vp by any of the candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemPopulist Donating Member (446 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-03 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #27
35. Sam Ervin, I think you mean
I agree with all the rest of it :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RobertFrancisK Donating Member (617 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-03 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
28. Yeah that was a terrible idea on his part
His career is basically finished now. It's a shame, he had potential.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
piece sine Donating Member (931 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-03 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. what gives?
This doesn't improve his chances for the White House..yuo can almost the collective sigh of indifference. The Freepers call him the "Breck Girl." But other than that, the don't give him the time of day. Either does the media. He'll make a ton of money back in private practice -- he comes off as a good lawyer. Trial lawyers are not often either party's first-pick for AG. He's thru. Kaput!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsipple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-03 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
29. Erskine Bowles to Be Swept In...
...With the Democratic wave of 2004.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-03 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #29
39. Exactly, Bowles will be a great Senator
too

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starpass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-03 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
32. Kind of shocking--C-Span Hot Line said he was expected to drop out
the first drop out because of his Senate seat and not doing that well. Kind of a dumb call on his part.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John_H Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-03 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
33. Dems will likely keep this seat.
Plenty of good candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gloria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-03 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
34. Didn't Bowles lose to Dole already?
please correct me if I'm wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-03 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. yes
but he did very well against her considering how popular she is in the state and will now be facing a far more conservative challenger (a supposed Jesse Helms clone), so he's got a better chance in 2004.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-03 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
37. And will gain a great president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-03 06:29 AM
Response to Original message
41. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-03 06:30 AM
Response to Original message
42. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-03 06:41 AM
Response to Reply #42
43. Which trail?
Edited on Mon Sep-08-03 07:18 AM by Bridget Burke
Appalachian Trail?

Mark Trail?

Treasure Trail?




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-03 06:58 AM
Response to Reply #43
47. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-03 06:58 AM
Response to Reply #42
46. It is spelled "TRIAL" not "trail" - Happy trails to you, until we meet...
Hooked on phonics?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JNelson6563 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-03 07:06 AM
Response to Reply #42
48. like the kind you would hire
if your kid died because of the incompetence of another.

Or maybe, you'd hire him, if you wanted to sue someone for using the term "fair and balanced"....?

hahahaha

Julie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CMT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-03 06:56 AM
Response to Original message
44. Edwards will no doubt be in the cabinet
I honestly don't think he will be the nominee. He won't have the senate seat to fall back on and it is doubtful that he will be the VP choice. But chances are that he will be selected for a cabinet post if he wants one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-03 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
49. I think Erskine Bowles can keep the seat.
I think he won against Dole, but the votes were rigged. I doubr they'll get away with it again.

Edwards just may end up as Attorney General, and he likely knows it, by now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC