Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hey! Electoral Fraud & the new Technocracy!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
complain jane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-05 08:18 PM
Original message
Hey! Electoral Fraud & the new Technocracy!
From Disinfopedia:

Electoral fraud is possibly the single most effective propaganda technique ever created. It simultaneously fools the majority of voters into thinking they are a minority, the minority to be empowered is emboldened by thinking they are a majority, moves the whole weight of the state, military, judiciary and bureaucracy behind the fraudulent pretender, and in general brings down the wrath of the public on those who contest the results beyond some minimal and mandated process.

<snip>

Thus, the ultimate propaganda technique may have met the ultimate pro-technology propaganda: the trusting of results simply because they come from code and not human ballot counters. One word for this is technocracy.

In July 2003, India, the largest democracy in the world, ran an all-electronic election, over the objections of opposition parties. Claims made by government-appointed experts that voting machines "could not be tampered with" are generally discarded by experts in every developed nation.

<snip>

Source
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
complain jane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-05 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hey! Here's some more!
The use of voting machine technology in India and the United States has been rife with accusations of new opportunities for electoral fraud. In 2000, there were a number of surprise Republican wins, which, in sum, barely gave the GOP the Senate in 2000 (until Jim Jeffords defected).

These races were all tallied in whole or in part by voting machines made by companies with close ties to the GOP and the religious right. One candidate, Chuck Hagel of Nebraska, "left his job as head of an electronic voting machine company to run as a long-shot candidate for the U.S. Senate." The machines vended by ES&S and Diebold Election Systems recorded that he won "stunning" upset victories in both the Republican primary and the general election." It is impossible to validate or recount ballots, as ballots do not exist. Source code for the machines is not available for scrutiny to the general public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-05 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. The part on Chuck Hagel is misleading.
They used optical-scan paper ballots in Nebraska.

The problem was that when the Democrats wanted a recount, the courts said, TOUGH LUCK, there is no recount law in Nebraska.

Someone reading the passage without knowing the background would assume Hagel had led a paper-less electronic voting company.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MHalblaub Donating Member (153 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-05 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. Unbelievable!
Once were Olympic games in America.
Assignment made for referee and the pairings in Boxing on computer.
What a big luck for the US boys...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC