Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush says "Bring it on!" was "a little blunt"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Rapcw Donating Member (567 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 10:16 AM
Original message
Bush says "Bring it on!" was "a little blunt"
Just saw this on the ABC interview this morning. Not sure if this is a duplicate or not but I dont think it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
1. A friend just emailed me a full article about that.
Gee George, you think? AAAGGGHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

He also said his tough talk may have had "unintended consequences." Unintended my aunt Fanny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
16. here's article: President Has Second Thoughts About 'Bring 'Em On'
President Has Second Thoughts About 'Bring 'Em On'

President Bush speaks to reporters at the White House.

WASHINGTON (Jan. 14) - President Bush says he now sees that tough talk can have an "unintended consequence."

During a round-table interview with reporters from 14 newspapers, the president, who not long ago declined to identify any mistakes he'd made during his first term, expressed misgivings for two of his most famous expressions: "Bring 'em on," in reference to Iraqis attacking U.S. troops, and his vow to get Osama bin Laden "dead or alive."

"Sometimes, words have consequences you don't intend them to mean," Bush said Thursday. "'Bring 'em on' is the classic example, when I was really trying to rally the troops and make it clear to them that I fully understood, you know, what a great job they were doing. And those words had an unintended consequence. It kind of, some interpreted it to be defiance in the face of danger. That certainly wasn't the case."

On other points, Bush said:

He wants Congress to approve major changes in the Social Security program before the end of May. Many Democrats and some Republicans in Congress oppose Bush's proposal, which may entail steep reductions in future benefits.

Baseball's new policy for steroids and other drugs is "a very strict policy and I want to congratulate both parties."

Four years as president have changed him. "They say my hair is grayer. But I come from a pretty white-haired gene pool. At least half of it."


"Sometimes, words have consequences you don't intend them to mean."
-President Bush

On July 2, 2003, two months after he had declared an end to major combat in Iraq, Bush promised U.S. forces would stay until the creation of a free government there. To those who would attack U.S. forces in an attempt to deter that mission, Bush said, "My answer is, Bring 'em on."

In the week after the Sept. 11 attacks, Bush was asked if he wanted bin Laden, the terrorist leader blamed for the attacks, dead.

"I want justice," Bush said. "And there's an old poster out West, that I recall, that said, 'Wanted, Dead or Alive."'

Recalling that remark, Bush told the reporters: "I can remember getting back to the White House, and Laura said, 'Why did you do that for?' I said, 'Well, it was just an expression that came out. I didn't rehearse it.'

"I don't know if you'd call it a regret, but it certainly is a lesson that a president must be mindful of, that the words that you sometimes say. ... I speak plainly sometimes, but you've got to be mindful of the consequences of the words. So put that down. I don't know if you'd call that a confession, a regret, something."

During his second debate last year with presidential challenger Sen. John Kerry, Bush was asked to name three instances in which he had made a wrong decision. At the time he declined to identify any specific mistakes.

Reporters at Thursday's round-table also asked Bush about the high price tag for his second inaugural celebration and suggestions the $40 million gala, which is being paid for by private donations - much of it coming from lobbyists and corporations - be scaled down.

"The inauguration is a great festival of democracy," he said. "People are going to come from all over the country who are celebrating democracy and celebrating my victory, and I'm glad to celebrate with them."

The newspapers participating in the round-table interview were the Detroit Free Press, the St. Petersburg (Fla.) Times, The (Portland) Oregonian, the (Little Rock) Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, The Miami Herald, The Kansas City (Mo.) Star, The (Phoenix) Arizona Republic, the Portland (Maine) Press Herald, The Hartford (Conn.) Courant, the Orlando (Fla.) Sentinel, The (Columbia, S.C.) State, The Philadelphia Inquirer, the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel and the St. Paul (Minn.) Pioneer-Press.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
2. "A little blunt"
BWAHAHAHA! George, you are a complete moron. The biggest pile of unfettered sociopathology on the planet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peekaloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
3. As a Python fan I say Bu$h is a silly bunt!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
danostuporstar Donating Member (147 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
4. wonder if that has anything to do
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rapcw Donating Member (567 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. probably n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
6. It's CYA time for Shrubbie and his cohorts.
Now they're also dumbing down the Iraqi elections, wanting us to "lower our expectations." First, no WMDs. Now, elections will probably not be legitimate. What was the damn point, George? And the body count? Just collateral damage?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
7. A Rovian attempt to change the tone
Introduce the new and improved bush. After all, they no longer need votes from the white trash in red states so he doesn't have to "be one of them" anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tuvor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
8. But he still hasn't made any mistakes. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
9. Care to take another swing at that debate question, Georgie?
Can you think of any mistakes or errors you've made in your first term?

What, oh what, will we tell the children? Screw that, what is Stupidhead going to say to the families of the dead?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
k8conant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
10. That's not the only dull instrument around:
http://abcnews.go.com/2020/Inauguration/story?id=406639&page=1
"I'll be more disciplined in how I say things," the president, adding, "I have to be cautious about conveying thoughts in a way that doesn't send wrong impressions about our country."

Yes, George.
  1. cautious
    1. conveying thoughts
      1. NOT send
      2. wrong impressions
      3. =send right impressions
  2. hence: watch out for sending right impressions

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
11. Gee, and we were "unpatriotic" for not standing up and cheering
when he said that. In fact, when we pointed out that the phrase "might have dangerous ramifications", we were assaulted with "You are unpatriotic and aiding the enemy!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SmokingJacket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
12. If blunt means stupid, yes. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ObaMania Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
13. My question is...
.. why are we and the DEM leadership going to let him get away with this??

The new FReep mantra will be "everyone makes mistakes" or "he apologized. Get over it" and * begins to write a clean legacy for himself.

Makes me wanna :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anarchy1999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
14. You know it really wasn't any worse than "you're either with us or against
us" or the "dead or alive, we're going to smoke him out", remarks. Just more of the same, "born again", God loving Christian in the man. May we also not forget "The axis of evil" or "crusade" remarks.

Now he's sorry for this one "bring em on", guess because Laura got on him about it and it seems to be really coming home to roost, just in time for another egg-filled parade to the swearing in ceremony and the parade to the white house he illegally occupies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greylyn58 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
15. Duhh...n/t
:freak:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
feminazi Donating Member (911 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
17. he's a grown man (supposedly)
and he just discovers that words have consequences?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC