bigtree
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-07-03 09:35 PM
Original message |
| What will Bush spend the 90billion on? |
|
Edited on Sun Sep-07-03 09:35 PM by bigtree
There's no assurance that it won't go right in the contractor's pockets to cover the loss of oil money that they were promised.
And then there's Biden; "I'll support giving the president the money": Echoes of the last Democrat cave-in to Bush.
It's not going to the troops. It's not going to the Iraqis.
I suspect that instead of expecting other countries to provide for themselves and truly contribute he will use the funds to pay blood wages for their mercenaries to come in and make the US force look smaller.
When will he submit the emergency supplemental? Good reading ahead!
|
| kalian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-07-03 09:36 PM
Response to Original message |
| RUMMYisFROSTED
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-07-03 09:37 PM
Response to Original message |
| MuseRider
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-07-03 09:43 PM
Response to Original message |
|
will ask for an accounting this time? Please? We should demand to know. I am making calls tomorrow to ask for that.
|
| pugslayer
(10 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-07-03 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
probably done by that little known Arthur Anderson Group!
|
| newyawker99
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-08-03 05:46 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
| bigtree
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-07-03 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
Look for who will recieve the emergency supplemental
"I'm the Commander, see...I do not need to explain
why I say things. That's the interesting thing about
being the President...I don't feel like I owe anybody
an explanation.- Bush to the National Security Council
|
| pugslayer
(10 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-07-03 09:43 PM
Response to Original message |
|
can Bush buy for 86 Billion???? How else will he get re-selected?
|
| mediaman007
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-07-03 09:55 PM
Response to Original message |
| 7. Congress must insist that their be bidding for the contracts, |
|
otherwise there is no accountability for the spending of the money. Bidding for contracts allows both sides to have expectations. Under the current plan, we hand over money and look the other way.
|
| bigtree
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-07-03 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
|
Edited on Sun Sep-07-03 10:06 PM by bigtree
they are just funnelling money into existing contracts or weapons systems that Congress had previously held up funding under a restricted budget. Like bunker-busters, mini-nukes, or new plutonium plants...Now the purse is open the military industrial warriors are suiting up for battle.
Good call on the contracts, though.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)     |
Wed Apr 24th 2024, 01:41 PM
Response to Original message |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
