Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So let me get this straight... What the G*O*P did with Armstrong Williams

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
ObaMania Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-05 12:10 AM
Original message
So let me get this straight... What the G*O*P did with Armstrong Williams
is fine because Howard Dean's camp paid KOS to pump him up on his blog?

That per O'Reilly tonight.

Please tell me this ain't true and please somebody go after O'Reilly for these f*&king lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
XNASA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-05 12:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. Great then. Prosecute both of 'em........
And let's see who ends up in jail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democracyindanger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-05 12:13 AM
Response to Original message
2. go to kos
read his comments on all this nonsense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tk2kewl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-05 12:14 AM
Response to Original message
3. 1. The payment was openly disclosed
2. IT WASN'T TAXPAYER DOLLARS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-05 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Yes
Tax payer dollars were used. Without disclosure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike Niendorff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-05 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Bill sounds worried.

Wonder why.


MDN


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PROGRESSIVE1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-05 12:23 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. How much does Bill get?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tk2kewl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-05 12:31 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. Faux is essentially ALL soft money anyway. A big 527
funded buy Pukert Murdoch
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jdj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-05 12:17 AM
Response to Original message
4. what's the deal with this teachout person anyway?
why would she even make an issue of this, and why now? Or is this old news made new by the reich wing propaganda bizness?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-05 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. There are two main theories at dailykos.com
1) Zephyr Teachout is a good person who wrote about blogging ethics for a journalism conference, and Wall St. Journal reporters saw her post and ran with it.

2) Zephyr Teachout is a not-so-good person who wanted publicity, and she saw the Armstrong Williams issue as a good way to get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-05 12:19 AM
Response to Original message
5. Uh, Get Real
Bush paid big bucks, with tax payer monies to prostitute Armstrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-05 12:26 AM
Response to Original message
9. Bush also has said
this action was completely wrong and everything should be done so this doesn't happen again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-05 12:27 AM
Response to Original message
11. They were told they were being paid for technical advice.
And the mydd.com guy tooka hiatus from blogging.

And kos disclosed that he was working for Howard Dean on the top-left of his blog at the time.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-05 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
13. government vs. corporate
I don't like either, but government sponsored propaganda is illegal. Big difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knight_of_the_star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-05 12:38 AM
Response to Original message
14. Different person doing the paying
If a private individual or organization wants to spend their money that way, that's their call. If the government wants to spend money on propaganda that's illegal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 04:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC