Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I'm of Draft Age

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
ck4829 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-05 10:56 AM
Original message
I'm of Draft Age
I turn 20 on Valentine's Day.

When I first heard that the draft was coming back, I knew it was no joke.

I have never supported the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. Were there evil people in those two countries? Yes, there were, but Bush and the Idiot Squad completely failed at handling this war on terror.

I have no desire to become cannon fodder for the RW, PNAC, and the Christian Right.

I guess it's a good thing I'll be in College for the next 2 years, but I know it won't be able to save me forever.

This is the RW's war, leave me out of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tomkertes Donating Member (62 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-05 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. Here is an interesting update on the draft issue
Edited on Sat Jan-15-05 11:01 AM by tomkertes
Rangel to Introduce Draft Bill Again Rep. Charles Rangel intends to reintroduce legislation calling for resumption of the draft during the current Congressional term, according to a memo circulated by Bill Galvin of the Center on Conscience and War. Rangel, it will be recalled, was the author of the notorious HR 163, the "universal" conscription bill that became a political football during the 2004 Presidential campaign. When charges that Bush would reinstate the draft emerged as a red-hot election issue last October, HR 163 became a liability for the Kerry campaign -- whereupon Rangel's bill was rushed to the floor and summarily voted down by a huge majority. For tactical reasons even the bill's sponsors, including Rangel, voted against it. http://nyc.indymedia.org/newswire/display/138944/index.php

http://nyc.indymedia.org/newswire/display_any/138983
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomkertes Donating Member (62 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-05 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. For daily updates on the draft issue visit DailyDraftDispatch.org
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-05 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I googled yesterday and could find no news source for this rumor.
They state the information was received in a memo form. From what I have read the compainion bill still "languishes in the Senate." However there are rumors that the Special Skills and Medical Skills Drafts are to be implemented very soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomkertes Donating Member (62 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-05 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. The sources are:
Theo Sitther, Center on Conscience and War
Bill Galvin, Center of Conscience and War

Jacob Levich, People Against the Draft

According to Levich, Levich recieved a memo from Bill Galvin that indicated that Rangel intended to resubmit the draft bill. The memo requests that anti-draft activists in Rangel's district contact Rangel and ask him to not go forward with the reintroduction.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomkertes Donating Member (62 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-05 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Reportedly from the memo:
"At our last meeting, Rangel’s Legislative Director, Emile Milne told us that, although a final decision has not been made, Mr. Rangel will probably introduce similar draft legislation in this Congress. (He did say they would fix the more problematic CO language.) He repeated Rangel’s flawed rationale: He said that since the country is at war, it is not fair that only poor folks are the ones on the battlefield, all levels of society should share the burden. He also said that if people realize that their children might be drafted for the war, they will care more about stopping the war."

http://nyc.indymedia.org/newswire/display_any/138983

Judge for yourself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-05 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-05 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. it's a pre-emptive strike
if there is gonna be a draft, make it fair. no more rich man's war, poor man's fight. i agree with him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-05 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #6
14. There's No Such Thing as a Fair Draft
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-05 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Nice try MegaWatt, but only 2 democrats voted for it
in October, and Rangel voted against it.

It is a stupid idea, however. Let the Repubs take ALL the blame when the D comes back
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babsbunny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-05 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
5. bless your heart
My son is 17. I don't know how to keep him out of the draft. Maybe if he tests possitive for drugs? He is colored blind too. there is a place called www.enjoythedraft.com. It is funny, and I hope it's not true!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
intheflow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-05 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #5
21. Hi, babsbunny.
Please look at post #15 in this thread to get information about helping your son to compile a conscientious objector file. The first link listed in the post is to the US selective service info on conscientious objector status, which proves that the government recognizes th legitamacy of claiming that war is against your family's personal belief system.

My son is 22. I'm certain that if a draft comes up, he'll be one of the first to be called because we're poor and I'm politically ative on the waaaaaay left. Scares the hell out of me. So I'm with you, Sister. :hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rockymountaindem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-05 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #5
24. If he is colorblind that should keep him out.
I think that colorblindness is a disqualification for most kinds of military service, especially combat duty. I really doubt they'd draft a colorblind man while they still have men around to draft who aren't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-05 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
7. college doesn't help you now IIRC
You only get to finish the current semester.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-05 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. UNless you are a divinity student
But then you might drafted as a chaplain!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-05 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #10
25. Correct.
This ain't gonna be your father's darft!

For more on draft news, read:

http://h2oman.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomkertes Donating Member (62 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-05 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
12. Why Democrats should oppose the draft now
But there also principled reasons to oppose the draft. For starters, if the government is no longer acting in good faith (i.e. if it run by a bunch of corrupt liars) then it's too late for the effects of the citizen-army to be helpful. In fact, the opposite is true. Drafting a military will strengthen, not weaken, the current regime. The time to push for a citizen's army is during peacetime - when republican governance is strong. Chomsky's calls for a citizen's army now, in the midst of war, only make sense in theoretical terms. The reality of war today forces us to respond accordingly. Given the current situation, no American should be compelled to fight in the administration's immoral and illegal war. To draft an American for this war, for the current occupation, violates the basic right of moral refusal in illegal war. So not only does the draft make stronger the war effort, but also it would require more citizens to take part in what is essentially an immoral and illegal act. We cannot stand for, and especially should not advocate for, such an expansion of state power at this time.

Charles Rangel's points about the draft being more just are good points. But he is doing it in the wrong way. By advancing the draft, Rangel creates cover for neo-conservatives Republicans when the time comes for the draft to serve their interests. Rangel's calls for the draft will not result in the draft. But if the draft is desired by the neo-conservatives, they will implicate Rangel in the call for the draft. He is providing a just basis for the draft. Once again, Rangel's point is good in theory. But in practice, if there is draft it will not be just. Americans of color and poor Americans will face the bullets head on, and in larger numbers than they do currently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brokensymmetry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-05 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. I think you're right.
Let it be a all-pug draft. Let them be blamed - fully, completely, utterly without cover - for the dead bodies coming home.

They'll certainly put in some loopholes - let them. And make sure the voters know who put them in and what the consequences are.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-05 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #12
22. in larger numbers than they do currently.
that will be pretty hard to accomplish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
intheflow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-05 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
15. Start putting together a conscientious objector (C.O.) file.
Edited on Sat Jan-15-05 11:32 AM by intheflow
If you go to church, and your minister is anti-war, get your minister to draft a letter stating how killings people is against your religion.

List any war protests, or history of war protests in your family. Go to war protests.

Write a short essay on why you believes war is immoral. Write a letter to the editor of your local paper on why this war is immoral/unjust.

The military doesn't want anyone in the trenches who doesn't want to fight. You might still be drafted with a C.O. file, but having the paperwork to back up his objections to warfare will go a long way in getting him a desk job instead of a patrol job.

For more much more information and suggestions on compiling a C.O. file, try these resources:

Selective Service:Conscientious Objector and Alternative Service http://www.sss.gov/FSconsobj.htm

Central Committee for Conscientious Objectors http://www.objector.org/

Center on Conscience and War http://www.nisbco.org/

Who is a conscientious objector? http://www.scn.org/ip/sdmcc/co.htm

American Friends (Quakers) Service Committee web site on Youth and Militarism http://www.afsc.org/youthmil/Default.htm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orpupilofnature57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-05 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
16. Sorry on behalf of the ? %, that neglected their civic duty, oust shrub.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-05 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
17. I don't think republicans would ever allow it to pass
Alot of the republican party is made up of hawkish individuals who want professional soldiers fighting wars because they don't want their kids at risk. The conservative fundamentalists are already upset with Iraq.

Republicans don't want to be known as the party that reinstituted the draft. It is bad for future votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
physioex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-05 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. What do you mean...
Conservative fundamentalists are already upset with Iraq? I watch the 700 Club to keep tabs on Pat and I see no such signs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
physioex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-05 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
18. Youre draft age if you are breathing....
Look at some of the old, fat, and out of shape the government is calling back up........


BTW Not trying to offend old or fat people just making a point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diamond14 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-05 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
19. to save yourself...BE in DC for the coronation....that's the ONLY way
you can save yourself....get on a bus....put some ACTION behind your words....

hope to see you here...otherwise, like most draftable young people, it's just blowing smoke.....

bush* KNOWS that the draftable people didn't vote, and don't protest the war....and if bush* KNOWS that no draftable people object to his coronation, it's a DONE DEAL FOR THE DRAFT...


get up off the couch and BE HERE IN DC.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NVMojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-05 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
23. there are many in your shoes ...don't give up ...you are the reason
and other like you, that I started speaking out against this administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-05 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
26. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
tomkertes Donating Member (62 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-05 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. DailyDraftDispatch.org has more info, perhaps not "all rumors"
the very real possibility of the draft should be enough to concern Democrats and other progressives

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
against all enemies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-05 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
27. Sorry to ruin your day, but there is no deferment for college anymore.
Ended during the Vietnam war, after Dick "I had other commitments" Cheney benefited from it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC