Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Mary Mapes of CBS was set up after exposing Abu Gharib....?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 11:40 AM
Original message
Mary Mapes of CBS was set up after exposing Abu Gharib....?
Was is just coincidence that CBS was to be the conduit for the Bush* TANG papers??? Call it a hunch, but Mary Mapes is the CBS producer that broke the Abu Gharib story and I'd bet money that the White House was out to 'get her' and they did one hell of a job. Hopefully CBS is working overtime to expose this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. And Rather helped bring down Nixon
This was a long-time-coming revenge, I have no doubt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Osamasux Donating Member (846 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. Who was the NY Times reporter who wrote negative pieces on
the competent Bush (41). Then Chimp walked up to him at a dinner after Clinton beat his dad, cursed him out, and said "we're going to get you." It's on record.

Chimp is known to be a vindictive SOB.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #9
24. Al HUNT, Judy WOODRUFF's Spouse
Shrub accosted the couple and their children in a restaurant and call HUNT an asshole (in front of wife and children). WSJ, not NYT?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Osamasux Donating Member (846 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. Thanks. I remembered Chimp's actions but not the details.
Among his countless other failings, the man has no class.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #24
42. Which makes you wonder why WoofWoof is such a GOP spinmeister.
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #42
45. It doesn't make ME wonder
$$$$$$$$$$$


Isn't that what whoring is all about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #45
49. Rove set it up to trash Josh Marshall's Exclusive about Niger Yellow Cake.
Rather went with the AWOL story and it Pre-empted 60 Minutes doing a whole show with Ed Bradley about how Italian Intelligence was responsible for Niger Yellow Cake story...connected to Plame Incident. Josh and Linda Rozen talked to a guy who knew alot about this and implications as to who forged the documents.

Salon Magazine published the whole transcript of 60 Minutes Show which was "canned" for AWOL following Ed Bradley through it.

It's here in the DU Archies and there was much discussion about it.

Josh's story about something SO BIG it would "shift the tectonic plates in DC" was the story that got canned for AWOL...

It was Rove...I'm convinced. Whether he "turned Rather" or whether Rather was clueless..I think CBS was used to can Marshall/Rozen's story.

Josh has never been the same since then...imho..anyway. :-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Piperay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
44. EXACTLY
they have been 'gunning' for Rather ever since, they hate his guts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
2. That would not surprise me...eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smbolisnch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
3. That's an interesting thought.
Lets just say I wouldn't be surprised. :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old blue Donating Member (225 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
4. I just hope *someone* is actually trying to track down
the origin of the false documents. It has smelled like a setup from day one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ninga Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Just saw Joe Lockhart on CNN w/Blitzer and
once again, the supposed defender allows the opposition to define the debate.

The entire Sunday morning circut has been peppered with the CBS BushAWOL story and NOT ONCE DID I HEAR ANY DEFENDERS (including the CBS spokeperson intervied by Howie on CNN) say that the story was not disproved, that the story had other elements that proved it to be true, it was the REPORT that was supposedly bogus that has caused the problem for CBS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. I agree and the TANG story is completely lost.
That's the real tragedy in this story. THE STORY is lost and I'm sure that was Karl Roves thinking. Blame the news reporters and not the news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #6
41. The TANG "story" was a no-go since * got a "pass" on it when
he ran for governor. He was then in a perfect position, as governor of the state which held 99% of his records. He had 5+ years to "tidy up"...and then in '99 during the first campaign for president, the mealy-mouthed, weasely press "folks" were more interested in reporting on "pilly, the gubernatorial pillow" and pondering what nickname he would give them, to even CARE whether or not he was a deserter...:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
7. Whores
In case you missed my Friday DU Comix offering... News you can use
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catzies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
8. You bet. And it was a three-fer for Karl Rove.
1) It effectively stopped all future inquiries into *'s military record; no one wants go to through what CBS did. The story is dead.

2) He got rid of a pillar of the "media elite."

3) Even if CBS works assiduously to expose this, RoveCo will be ahead of them, calling it "sour grapes," "disgruntled," and worthy of immediate discrediting by the other news readers on other networks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. Don't you know Rove & Bush* were 'high-fiving' in the Oval Office.
Bush* family has hated Rather for YEARS and they GOT him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
forgethell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #8
23. The real tragedy about
this whole thing is that even if the story was true, even if the documents were genuine, and proven to be so, it wouldn't have mattered. NOBODY CARED. Those that were for * would have believed what they already believed. Those that were for him would have disregarded them and believed them false anyway. And the sheeple in the middle would have thought it was all too compmlex for them, and anyway, didn't it happen 30 years ago, and Jeez, everybody deserves a second chance.

IT DIDN'T MATTER to anybody, or very few.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoStinkinBadges Donating Member (99 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. You may be right.
Ironic, but by having the document exposed as not genuine it did become a plus for Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
forgethell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #25
38. Yes, I thinnk so. And,
it just goes to show that one should never let their emotions, no matter how justified (in this case, hatred of *), affect their ability to think. They did this, I believe, and have paid a price. It is the way of the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Osamasux Donating Member (846 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
10. We need to continue our efforts to get our own media outlets.
Maybe we can have something decent in place by the 2008 elections. AAR is one avenue. We need much more.

We also need a party apparatus that drives news and stops just reacting all the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #10
58. Here ya go, right in our own cyber-backyard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
11. Exactly. She is a heroine! She did the right thing and the right wing
took her down. We need to mobilize to show her our support. I sent angry email to CBS but I havent been able to get in touch with her to express my support. Does anyone know how to contact her?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NV Whino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
12. That same thought crossed my mind
But then I put on my tinfoil hat everyday.
:tinfoilhat:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Hope yours fits as well as mine
Oddly enough, there have been theories in DU that I have thought were WAY TOO FAR OUT to be true and low and behold!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. See the post "The Media Lynching"
Edited on Sun Jan-16-05 01:05 PM by McCamy Taylor
There was a coordinated attack on her as the CBS story was breaking. I found three stories within a matter of minutes with a search were probably more out there. I think she really was the target. Rather is a talking head journalist, he reads what is given to him.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=203x281916#281934

After an interview * gave recently, I now agree that she was taken down in retaliation for the prison abuse stories. I think the election was stolen primarily to cover IRAQgate. The Bushies were scared to death that if Kerry won they would all go to jail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catzies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Thanks for linking that thread. I would have missed it otherwise
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoStinkinBadges Donating Member (99 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
14. Who Produced Those Documents?
Someone needs to investigate where those documents really came from. This event turned out to be an asset for Bush and may have helped him get re-elected. If CBS was tricked, and they very well may have, why aren't they digging to see who did this to them? Or perhaps they are and we are just not aware of it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
17. There's a lot of info in an LAT article I posted in LBN, and was moved...
to Editorials and Other Articles (to be seen by very few, I'm afraid). Here's a link:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=103x98368
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catchawave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
19. They should seriously investigate Burkett....
Rove could've hired him? If I were Mapes, I'd be doing an audit of his bank account for the past year. Also, an audit of everyone involved in authenticating the TANG docs.

Other than that, I'm still waiting for someone to cover the real story, how Bush "got out" of the NG. I think alot of doc tweaking was done before his run for TX gov.

:tinfoilhat: <----and proud of it :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. I seriously hope that this is going on. I can't imagine Rather wanting
to retire with the bushit smell all over his pretty amazing career.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Geek_Girl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #19
33. Burkett Perfect Patsy
:tinfoilhat:
He appeared on the talk show circuit and really stuck his neck out it was easy for Rove to chop it off. I think someone gave him those documents just like he claimed and they set up him up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #19
36. no no no
Edited on Sun Jan-16-05 03:47 PM by grasswire
Burkett is NOT a paid stooge for Rove. Those of us who have worked together to investigat the AWOL story since 1999 know that Burkett was always anti-Bush. His judgment was quite impaired, that's all. He's sort of like James Hatfield, the writer that Karl Rove set up to innoculate Bush against the cocaine story. Hatfield was eventually suicided.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leetrisck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
20. "Couldn't determine if documents were fake"
Would think that would be the real story. This big investigation and they don't know if they are real or fake. So just who decided in the first place they were fake besides rw republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
forgethell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
22. Bah.
Hopefully CBS is working overtime to expose this

CBS knuckled under, and sold her ass down the river, to protect their own lousy corporate butts.




x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
26. Roger & Nikki STONE, Harry "Buckhead" MacDOUGALD, and ROVE
Edited on Sun Jan-16-05 02:58 PM by UTUSN
need to go under oath for this (and many more things).

Who are they? Roger J. STONE and his Cuban wife Nikki. He has been involved in Repuke dirty tricks since age 19 for NIXON. When DOLE ran for prez, STONE was a chief adviser and advised that "family values" be a key campaign issue. During the campaign the National Enquirer found out that Mr and Mrs STONE were "swingers" who advertised for other couples, and who posted their nekkid pics of themselves in magazines. More recently, Roger was the leader of the Repuke mob that stormed the Miami elections office in 2000.

The CBS documents were called-in to the BURKETT informer-dude by somebody named "Lucy RAMIREZ". Uh, could it be Nikki the Cuban? She was supposed to deliver them to BURKETT at the stock show in Houston. When BURKETT got there, a man in a suit is who delivered the documents. This was in May, 2004. BURKETT sat on the documents for months.

When CBS made contact with BURKETT and then aired the story in September, FOUR HOURS LATER a Repuke lawyer, Harry MacDOUGALD was on the internet claiming the documents were forgeries. Uh, how would he know, not having SEEN or handled the documents personally?

**********QUOTE*******

http://www.voiceoffreedom.com/electionstuff/electionlaw ...

According to Judge Hooper’s 36-page order, Roger Stone, through his Washington, D.C.-based firm, "Ikon Public Affairs", was the real agent behind the campaign in late 2000 and 2001 to defeat the Florida Justices in the 2002 merit retention election. But who, if anyone, was paying Roger Stone and giving him orders remains unclear.

http://www.villagevoice.com/issues/0405/barrett.php

'Roger Stone, the longtime Republican dirty-tricks operative who led the mob that shut down the Miami-Dade County recount and helped make George W. Bush president in 2000, is financing, staffing, and orchestrating the presidential campaign of Reverend Al Sharpton.'

http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/2004/la-091704buck...

Blogger Who Faulted CBS Documents Is Conservative Activist

WASHINGTON — It was the first public allegation that CBS News used forged memos in its report questioning President Bush's National Guard service — a highly technical explanation posted within hours of airtime citing proportional spacing and font styles.

But it did not come from an expert in typography or typewriter history as some first thought. Instead, it was the work of Harry W. MacDougald, an Atlanta lawyer with strong ties to conservative Republican causes who helped draft the petition urging the Arkansas Supreme Court to disbar President Clinton after the Monica Lewinsky scandal, the Times has found.

The identity of "Buckhead," a blogger known previously only by his screen name on the site freerepublic.com ....

************UNQUOTE*******
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoStinkinBadges Donating Member (99 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. Interesting.
Wonder if CBS is investigating this? They need to clear their name and exposing a dirty trick as the source of their bad documents would help.

Criminal charges should be filed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #27
37. start with a subpoena of Burkett's phone records
and start identifying the numbers during that period of time. Ms. Ramirez might have been clever enough to use a throwaway cel phone, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Osamasux Donating Member (846 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. Were the documents shopped around and others saw them
and turned them down before CBS? If that were the case, that could partially explain the four hour response to the story.

The whole thing stinks, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoStinkinBadges Donating Member (99 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. USA had them.
Edited on Sun Jan-16-05 02:37 PM by NoStinkinBadges
Not sure if they were shopped around but I seem to recall reading that USA Today had them. That was one of the reasons why CBS claimed they were in a rush to air them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. "Lucy RAMIREZ" Claimed She Saw BURKETT on Tweety's Circus
I remember seeing BURKETT on Tweety's circus and Tweety treated him well. "Lucy RAMIREZ" called BURKETT and told him she was calling him because of his performace on Tweety. But in his round of whoring on all the outlets that will have him, post the CBS report, Tweety has been saying that he knew BURKETT is a phoney from day one. Tweety thinks his intelligence shows in his coinages, and what he has been saying is, "This phoney BURKETT claimed to be at EVERY place where (Shrub's) records were: He was THERE when pages were being tossed into the trash, he was THERE when (Shrub's flying monkeys) called the officer to tell him to destroy the documents. (Here's the catchphrase: ) He must be ZELLIG, always THERE at the right moment."

CHEENEEing-Tweety. The people who know BURKETT say he is a decent fellow, a good Dem, and, yes, he has a personal gripe over a Disability claim against the Shrub, but this does NOT discredit him. One of Tweety's guests said that the problem was that BURKETT changed his story. Uh, how many stories has Shrub changed multiple times?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Geek_Girl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. I think Burkett was Rove's Patsy
:tinfoilhat:
Rove master minded this. Someone got in touch with Burkett and gave him those documents. Burkett believed the person "Lucy Ramirez" to be credible. CBS got wind of the documents and took the bait, hook line and sinker and Rove reeled in the biggest fish in television news, Dan Rather.

The only question left is Who is Lucy Ramirez?

:tinfoilhat:

Anyway that's my tinfoil hat theory on the CBS documents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #32
47. You Got It, Toyota n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
34. I might agree........
...but the documents were apparently shopped to some other people first. At least that's part of the story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democracyindanger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
35. No, Seymour Hersh broke the Abu Ghraib story.
Credit where credit's due.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #35
48. Mapes pushed to have the pictures put on CBS...Hersh's New Yorker
article wouldn't have gotten as much coverage. :shrug: I think Rove set it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #48
51. They both are credited with having broke the story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democracyindanger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #48
52. Probably right.
New Yorker doesn't do pictorials, which the story really needed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
39. Who is Michael Smith?
We need to know more about him. He's the freelancer who tipped Mapes off about Burkett's papers. He became her asst producer on the story.

Who is Michael Smith? Is he living above his means?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigMindTinyHead Donating Member (42 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
40. Need some proof with facts
Please post it when you get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #40
54. The original post is a speculation, and doesn't try to pass itself as fact
But I understand why you'd react negatively to speculation of this kind. I REALLY do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Piperay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
43. Probably BUT
she fell into it and should have checked her facts, so ultimately the blame still lies with her. :-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NVMojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
46. good point ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #46
50. The origin of the false documents?
Do any of the pundits ever ask that question?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #50
53. They dont care. Nor do they care that the facts in the documents
were accurate. Viacom, CBS's parent company needed an excuse to fire her in order to prove themselves worthy of the kind of favors the administration is lavishing on other media giants, and Karl Rove created a document so close to perfect and gave it to a source so credible that even a dedicated journalist would have had little reason to suspect that it was not real.

She ought to file a lawsuit against Viacom and CBS claiming that she was unjustly fired, ask to see all contact between her network and parent company and the administration. That would be an eye opener---if the White House didnt claim executive privilege.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
55. Great Bob Parry piece about reporters who "mess" with the Bushes
Contrasts the media lies about Gore and Clinton with the sad fates of Webb, Hatfield and now Mapes, required reading.

http://www.consortiumnews.com/2005/011705.html

The Bush Rule of Journalism
By Robert Parry
January 17, 2005


“Don’t take on the Bushes” is becoming an unwritten rule in American journalism. Reporters can make mistakes in covering other politicians and suffer little or no consequence, but a false step when doing a critical piece on the Bushes is a career killer.

The latest to learn this hard lesson are four producers at CBS, who demonstrated inadequate care in checking out memos purportedly written by George W. Bush’s commanding officer in the Texas Air National Guard in the early 1970s. For this sloppiness, CBS fired the four, including Mary Mapes who helped break last year’s Abu Ghraib torture scandal.

A painful irony for the CBS producers was that the central points of the memos – that Bush had blown off a required flight physical and was getting favored treatment in the National Guard – were already known, and indeed, were confirmed by the commander’s secretary in a follow-up interview with CBS. But even honest mistakes are firing offenses when the Bushes are involved.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
56. Keith Olberman just revealed ONLY Mary Mapes was fired, other 3
are in contract negotiations. Sounds like Mapes was the only target all along and the other three were named in an attempt to hide that fact. A pretty pitiful attempt, since so many people noticed that she was the target of the attack.

:mad: :mad: :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
57. Sy HERSH broke Abu Ghraib, NOT Mabes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #57
59. She put it on TV for all to see. The White House isnt afraid of print.
but they demand complete control of the Big Five TV News.

I sent CBS a very annoyed email about their lie about firing FOUR employees when they really only fired ONE (Mapes). They tried very hard to hide the fact that she was the target of this attack. I guess they didnt want anyone to realize that they were bowing to administration pressure to get rid of this loose cannon who would not hesitate to air stories that were critical of the administration.

CBS-Viacom are scum. If I didnt like the Daily Show so much, I would boycott them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC