Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A Point-By-Point Response to Bush's Speech

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-03 11:36 PM
Original message
A Point-By-Point Response to Bush's Speech
September 8, 2003
TEXT
President Bush's Address to the Nation

Following is a transcript of President Bush's address to the nation last night, as recorded by The New York Times:

Good evening. I have asked for this time to keep you informed of America's actions in the war on terror.

Nearly two years ago, following deadly attacks on our country, we began a systematic campaign against terrorism. These months have been a time of new responsibilities and sacrifice and national resolve and great progress.

Note well the immediate connection between Iraq and September 11.

America and a broad coalition acted first in Afghanistan, by destroying the training camps of terror and removing the regime that harbored Al Qaeda.

Wrong. They are still there, and getting more active by the day, and recruiting well in Pakistan.

In a series of raids and actions around the world, nearly two-thirds of Al Qaeda's known leaders have been captured or killed, and we continue on Al Qaeda's trail. We have exposed terrorist front groups, seized terrorist accounts,

Except for the ones that operate on the same offshore banking zones used by Enron and other mega-corps from America. Thank you, Senator Gramm

taken new measures to protect our homeland,

Such as stealing money from cops, firemen, EMTs

and uncovered sleeper cells inside the United States. And we acted in Iraq, where the former regime sponsored terror,

Proof?

possessed and used weapons of mass destruction,

Posessed? Past-tense? When do we start bombing Germany and Japan? After all, if we're going to make war on nations for things they did way in the past, we can start with the two biggies from the Axis, right? Liar.

and for 12 years defied the clear demands of the United Nations Security Council.

To do what? Disarm? THEY WERE DISARMED!

Our coalition enforced these international demands in one of the swiftest and most humane military campaigns in history.

It's humane if you live in Paul Bremer's house. It's brutal if you don't. Liar.

For a generation leading up to September the 11th, 2001, terrorists and their radical allies attacked innocent people in the Middle East and beyond, without facing a sustained and serious response.

Because we were arming and funding them.

The terrorists became convinced that free nations were decadent and weak. And they grew bolder, believing that history was on their side. Since America put out the fires of September the 11th and mourned our dead and went to war, history has taken a different turn. We have carried the fight to the enemy.

Again, Iraq = September 11. The dead remember, you fuck.

We are rolling back the terrorist threat to civilization, not on the fringes of its influence, but at the heart of its power.

In Baghdad, where there were no terrorists before our war. NOTE WELL: He is actually talking about the Middle East when he says "The heart of its power." Holy war, here we come. But democracies don't start agressive wars. Erm...

This work continues. In Iraq, we are helping the long-suffering people of that country to build a decent and democratic society at the center of the Middle East.

BWWWWWAAAAAAAAAAAAHHH HAH HAH HAH...There is and never will be anything even vaguely resembling democracy in Iraq as long as this clown is in Washington.

Together we are transforming - transforming a place of torture chambers and mass graves into a nation of laws and free institutions.

Nation-building, George? And by the way, weren't those mass graves holding the people your dad cajoled into revolting against Saddam in 1991, right before he left them to get slaughtered. Everyone trusts the Bushes these days.

This undertaking is difficult and costly - yet worthy of our country, and critical to our security.

Bag of shit. There is nothing worthy about this, and it has nothing whatsoever to do with our security. It has everything, however, to do with George's election security in 2004.

The Middle East will either become a place of progress and peace, or it will be an exporter of violence and terror that takes more lives in America and in other free nations.

Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaand killing lots of innocent people will help the process.

The triumph of democracy and tolerance in Iraq, in Afghanistan and beyond would be a grave setback for international terrorism. The terrorists thrive on the support of tyrants and the resentments of oppressed peoples. When tyrants fall and resentment gives way to hope, men and women in every culture reject the ideologies of terror and turn to the pursuits of peace. Everywhere that freedom takes hold, terror will retreat.

But there is no freedom in Iraq or Afghanistan, only rage and death and despair. Where rage and death and despair take hold, there will be terrorism. Well done, George.

Our enemies understand this. They know that a free Iraq will be free of them, free of assassins and torturers and secret police.

Except of course for the American assassins and torturers and secret police.

They know that as democracy rises in Iraq, all of their hateful ambitions will fall like the statues of the former dictator. And that is why, five months after we liberated Iraq, a collection of killers is desperately trying to undermine Iraq's progress and throw the country into chaos.

No, George. They just hate you. You killed their children, you destroyed their dignity, you've taken what little they had at all and thrown it into the mud...but you aren't there to take the heat. 19 year old boys and girls are there to take your heat, to die for your lies.

Some of the attackers are former members of the old Saddam regime, who fled the battlefield and now fight in the shadows.

Va-Va-Va-Va-Vietnam, Sa-Sa-Sa-Sa-Saigon.

Some of the attackers are foreign terrorists, who have come to Iraq to pursue their war on America and other free nations.

WHO WERE NOT THERE BEFORE, WHO WERE NOT ALLOWED TO BE THERE BEFORE.

We cannot be certain to what extent these groups work together. We do know they have a common goal: reclaiming Iraq for tyranny.

Wrong. They just want to kick your shit ass. Iraqis are as nationalistic as Americans, but with 80 million machine guns added to the mix.

Most, but not all, of these killers operate in one area of the country. The attacks you have heard and read about in the last few weeks have occurred predominantly in the central region of Iraq, between Baghdad and Tikrit - Saddam Hussein's former stronghold. The north of Iraq is generally stable and is moving forward with reconstruction and self-government.

Thye north is where the oil wells are. Hmmm...

The same trends are evident in the south, despite recent attacks by terrorist groups.

The same trends are evident in the south, eeeexcept for the attacks, which means the trend isn't evident at all.

Though their attacks are localized, the terrorists and Saddam loyalists have done great harm. They have ambushed American and British service members who stand for freedom and order. They have killed civilian aid workers of the United Nations who represent the compassion and generosity of the world. They have bombed the Jordanian embassy, the symbol of a peaceful Arab country. And last week they murdered a respected cleric and over 100 Muslims at prayer, bombing a holy shrine and a symbol of Islam's peaceful teachings.

Nationalistic, George. If Allah Himself rolled into Baghdad under the flag of a different nation, the Iraqis would fight Him because he was not Iraqi.

This violence is directed, not only against our coalition, but - but against anyone in Iraq who stands for decency and freedom and progress.

No. It is an nascent ethnic civil war. It is also directed at the people who invaded their country

There is more at work in these attacks than blind rage.

The ONLY correct thing said in this entire speech.

The terrorists have a strategic goal. They want us to leave Iraq before our work is done. They want to shake the will of the civilized world. In the past, the terrorists have cited the examples of Beirut and Somalia, claiming that if you inflict harm on Americans, we will run from a challenge. In this, they are mistaken.

Really? Then why are you going begging to the world to help clean up your mess?

Two years ago, I told the Congress and the country that the war on terror would be a lengthy war, a different kind of war, fought on many fronts in many places. Iraq is now the central front.

And a total waste of time, blood, treasure and international goodwill.

Enemies of freedom are making a desperate stand there and there they must be defeated.

Enemies of freedom? You mean THE IRAQI PEOPLE???

This will take time and require sacrifice.

But not from me. I'm a Bush.

Yet we will do what is necessary, we will spend what is necessary, to achieve this essential victory in the war on terror, to promote freedom and to make our own nation more secure.

What's this 'we' shit, white man? 'We' will spend what it necessary? Ya know, there's a few busted-ass things that could use some funding here, like...ohhh...SOCIAL SECURITY AND MEDICARE AND A HUNDRED OTHER VITAL PROGRAMS. Nothing about this makes us more secure.

America has done this kind of work before. Following World War II, we lifted up the defeated nations of Japan and Germany, and stood with them as they built representative governments.

After going to war against them for far more demonstrable reasons

We committed years and resources to this cause. And that effort has been repaid many times over in three generations of friendship and peace. America today accepts the challenge of helping Iraq in the same spirit, for their sake and our own.

So PNAC is now the Marshall Plan? Barf.

Our strategy in Iraq has three objectives: destroying the terrorists, enlisting the support of other nations for a free Iraq and helping Iraqis assume responsibility for their own defense and their own future.

You mean (1. Crushing the populace; (2. Getting the world to bail us out; (3. Propping up Ahmad Chalabi and a puppet regime that will do our bidding.

First, we are taking direct action against the terrorists in the Iraqi theater, which is the surest way to prevent future attacks on coalition forces and the Iraqi people.

But you just said the enemy was the Iraqi people? What theater? Do they have popcorn?

We are staying on the offensive,

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

with a series of precise strikes against enemy targets increasingly guided by intelligence given to us by Iraqi citizens.

...who lied to you about the WMDs, right? Wasn't that ladt week's excuse? Precision strikes against what? Mud? Huts? Babies?

Since the end of major combat operations,

Ya mean "Mission Accomplished"? Ya mean the 'end' that has cost more blood than the actual 'war'?

we have conducted raids seizing many caches of enemy weapons and massive amounts of ammunition, and we have captured or killed hundreds of Saddam loyalists and terrorists. So far, of the 55 most wanted former Iraqi leaders, 42 are dead or in custody.

*cough*Saddam*cough*Osama*cough*bullshit*cough*

We're sending a clear message: Anyone who seeks to harm our soldiers can know that our soldiers are hunting for them.

They don't seem to be getting the message, George. They seem, in fact, to be bleeding us dry in flesh and finances.

Second, we are committed to expanding international cooperation in the reconstruction and security of Iraq, just as we are in Afghanistan.

Please help please help we're so fucked please o please help

Our military commanders in Iraq advise me that the current number of American troops, nearly 130,000, is appropriate to their mission.

:grr: That's it. Just :grr: .

They are joined by over 20,000 service members from 29 other countries. Two multinational divisions, led by the British and the Poles, are serving alongside our forces. And in order to share the burden more broadly, our commanders have requested a third multinational division to serve in Iraq.

They're REMFs, just like you, dog. The Americans are the ones getting shot.

Some countries have requested an explicit authorization of the United Nations Security Council before committing troops to Iraq.

Because they wisely don't want your dumb ass in charge.

I have directed Secretary of State Colin Powell to introduce a new Security Council resolution, which would authorize the creation of a multinational force in Iraq, to be led by America.

Please help please help we're so fucked please o please help

I recognize that not all our friends agreed with our decision to enforce the Security Council resolutions and remove Saddam Hussein from power. Yet we cannot let past differences interfere with present duties.

"Present duties." We shit on the floor. Now someone else can get the mop. I love it.

Terrorists in Iraq have attacked representatives of the civilized world and opposing them must be the cause of the civilized world.

Dastardly. Bush is using the bombing of the UN, which was HIS FAULT, to demand international help for his mess. Amazing. How many dead people has this guy used to get what he wants? We've passed 50,000, I think.

Members of the United Nations now have an opportunity, and the responsibility, to assume a broader role in assuring that Iraq becomes a free and democratic nation.

"Responsibility." Clean up my mess

Third, we are encouraging the orderly transfer of sovereignty and authority to the Iraqi people. Our coalition came to Iraq as liberators and we will depart as liberators.

ROFL

Right now Iraq has its own Governing Council, comprised of 25 leaders

Puppets led by Chalabi

representing Iraq's diverse people. The Governing Council recently appointed cabinet ministers to run government departments. Already more than 90 percent of towns and cities have functioning local governments, which are restoring basic services.

Lies. We've been supressing elections over there for a while now

We are helping to train civil defense forces to keep order and an Iraqi police service to enforce the law, a facilities protection service, Iraqi border guards to help secure the borders and a new Iraqi army. In all these roles, there are now some 60,000 Iraqi citizens under arms, defending the security of their own country, and we are accelerating the training of more.

Almost all of whom were part of Saddam's gangs

Iraq is ready to take the next steps toward self-government. The Security Council resolution we introduce will encourage Iraq's Governing Council to submit a plan and a timetable for the drafting of a constitution and for free elections. From the outset, I have expressed confidence in the ability of the Iraqi people to govern themselves. Now they must rise to the responsibilities of a free people and secure the blessings of their own liberty.

MY FAVORITE PART. We bombed the shit out of them, destroyed their infrastructure, stole their oil, caused terrorists to flood in, and started an ethnic civil war. But it is theior responsibility to deal with it.

Our strategy in Iraq will require new resources. We have conducted a thorough assessment of our military and reconstruction needs in Iraq, and also in Afghanistan. I will soon submit to Congress a request for $87 billion. The request will cover ongoing military and intelligence operations in Iraq, Afghanistan and elsewhere, which we expect will cost $66 billion over the next year.

Over and above the billions and billions and billions you've already wasted. Goodbye, 1932 election. Mr. Roosevelt, your table is ready

This budget request will also support our commitment to helping the Iraqi and Afghan people rebuild their own nations, after decades of oppression and mismanagement. We will provide funds to help them improve security. And we will help them to restore basic services, such as electricity and water, and to build new schools, roads and medical clinics.

Memo to Americans: NO SOUP FOR YOU.

This effort is essential to the stability of those nations, and therefore to our own security. Now and in the future, we will support our troops and we will keep our word to the more than 50 million people of Afghanistan and Iraq.

You've broken your word to them so many times, and so has your father, that only blind children believe you now

Later this month, Secretary Powell will meet with representatives of many nations to discuss their financial contributions to the reconstruction of Afghanistan. Next month, he will hold a similar funding conference for the reconstruction of Iraq. Europe, Japan and states in the Middle East all will benefit from the success of freedom in these two countries, and they should contribute to that success.

Please help please help we're so fucked please o please help

The people of Iraq are emerging from a long trial. For them, there will be no going back to the days of the dictator, to the miseries and humiliation he inflicted on that good country.

Ah. Irony.

For the Middle East and the world, there will be no going back to the days of fear, when a brutal and aggressive tyrant possessed terrible weapons.

Ah. Irony

And for America, there will be no going back to the era before September the 11th, 2001, to false comfort in a dangerous world.

Deutchland, Deutchland, uber alles...

We have learned that terrorist attacks are not caused by the use of strength. They are invited by the perception of weakness.

Exactly wrong. Our "strength" in fucking around with the world is exactly what caused 9/11. It was also our greatest weakness, and will continue to be for as long as you haunt the White House.

And the surest way to avoid attacks on our own people is to engage the enemy where he lives and plans.

Unless we're talking Iraq, where they weren't living and weren't planning

We are fighting that enemy in Iraq and Afghanistan today so that we do not meet him again on our own streets, in our own cities.

Iraq = September 11. Yes, the Ba'athists are gonna fight it out on Main Street. Ahhh duuhhh pzzzzcheeeeezzzz...

The heaviest burdens in our war on terror fall, as always, on the men and women of our armed forces and our intelligence services.

Bush, you are an AWOL chickenass deserter motherfucker. Just for the record.

They have removed gathering threats to America and our friends, and this nation takes great pride in their incredible achievements. We are grateful for their skill and courage, and for their acts of decency, which have shown America's character to the world. We honor the sacrifice of their families. And we mourn every American who has died so bravely, so far from home.

It is perhaps most offensive to hear this cad foul the noble spirit of our troops with his lying tongue. It is impossible to dishonor them, really, but this comes close

The Americans who assume great risks overseas understand the great cause they are in. Not long ago I received a letter from a captain in the Third Infantry Division in Baghdad. He wrote about his pride in serving a just cause and about the deep desire of Iraqis for liberty.

"I see it," he said, "in the eyes of a hungry people every day here. They are starved for freedom and opportunity." And he concluded, "I just thought you'd like a note from the `front lines of freedom.' "

P.S. Get me home and out of this cloud of depleted uranium, you jackass!!!

That Army captain, and all of our men and women serving in the war on terror, are on the front lines of freedom. And I want each of them to know, your country thanks you and your country supports you.

The front lines of freedom. I feel so...free

Fellow citizens: We've been tested these past 24 months and the dangers have not passed. Yet Americans are responding with courage and confidence. We accept the duties of our generation. We are active and resolute in our own defense. We are serving in freedom's cause and that is the cause of all mankind.

And we is gettin' paid, baby. Wait. We? Sorry, no. Just me n' Dick.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
disgruntella Donating Member (983 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-03 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. <applause>
Now if only they had that on the closed captions while I was watching...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-03 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. You got it right Will. on the money.
He don't even know he being used by the Pub Masters. They end up with the money and he with a bad name. What a fool he is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissMarple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-03 12:57 AM
Original message
Will's closed captions would have been perfect.
Then we would have known there were POINTS in the speech. And to think I almost looked for a handkerchief.

He actually looked like a very earnest sixth grader giving his first speech in front of the class.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-03 06:14 AM
Response to Original message
31. Sounds like a Symbolman/Will Pitt project to me...
Perhaps a regular feature?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
homelandpunk Donating Member (787 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-03 11:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. $87 billion for a lie!!
that GODDAMNED LIE about Iraq! tied to 9/11!!
By saying that his attack on Iraq was in direct reciprocation, that "we took the battle to the heart of the threat" or some shit like that.
Here it is:
"Since America put out the fires of September the 11th and mourned our dead and went to war, history has taken a different turn. We have carried the fight to the enemy."
He made the reference all thru that fucking eye-blinking-fest of a teleprompted speech.
No one will call him on this lie that is now the foundation for ripping off the treasury. 87 B... B... BILLION!!!!! On a lie!
If the lie was just questioned once by any of the Dem candidates...but hell no...hopefully maybe Kucinich? I hope someone says something, cause Bush has already DECREED that it has to be paid. Why can't they stop him? Why is everyone so fucking traumatized by 9/11 that this shit goes on and on and on and on and on and fucking on??...how fucking traumatized are they??? Like a bunch a goddamned Dennis Millers ..."I'm scared, I need daddy-figure to soothe me, and like the little child, daddy can say stuff I don't comprehend, but I know he is right, cuz daddy figure is daddy and he is good to me."
God I hate these kind of pussies.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mz Pip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-03 11:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. I think I was
maybe expecting some new material from Bush since the old material is getting so stale. But no, he just recycled the same old 9/11 terrorist = Saddam Iraq crap. Repeating the same old lies, in case we missed them the first 20 times he told them.

Guess this is just setting things up for him to blame the UN again if they don't go along with him, which they won't. Gotta have a fall guy in place when the shit starts hitting the fan worse than it already is.

We have to get this guy out of there next year. We really really do.

MzPip
:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ellen Forradalom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-03 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
4. It's a good thing I didn't have the liquor out,
ready to down a shot at every cliche, or I would've been falling down drunk long before he finished.

Will, I forced myself to listen to this speech. I could not believe what a fantasy land he inhabits. "Terrorists" are responsible for three recent bombings and we're gonna get 'em. No information about who these terrorists were. Just one big amorphous mass of Terrorists. The vile fearmongering was beyond belief.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-03 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Aha!
Finally a fun way to watch Dubya speak. Every time he says "terra" you have to tak a slug of beer. (I think somebody counted 27 times in an 18 minute speech). Alcohol is the only way to numb the mind after such other (mind-numbing) horseshit.

Really. I'm surpirised they didn't have to keep this speech in a zip-locked baggie just to keep the dung beetles from getting to it!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-03 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
5. Thanks for the commentary Will
There were sooooooo many lies and misrepresentations in that speech, that I had to concentrate my LTTE on just one: the blurring of 9/11 with Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coffee Coyote Donating Member (949 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-03 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
6. excellent
And my prediction was right - he is asking for help without saying it is help - an admission that, as you put it - we want you to clean up our shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-07-03 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
7. What *is* all that "we" shit?
Did Rove figure out people were onto Bush's narcissism? Are they going to try to pretend the Bush boy is humble until Election Day 2004?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalmuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-03 12:01 AM
Response to Original message
10. Thank you, Will!
I didn't watch the speech, and there is no way I could ever get through this disgusting drivel without your intelligent, witty commentary. I hope this is the one that finally sinks this floating turd. Unbelievable!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-03 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
11. Excellent
Edited on Mon Sep-08-03 12:08 AM by Skwmom
I would only add in reference to "These months have been a time of new responsibilities and sacrifice and national resolve and great progress."

Who has sacrificed? Certainly not Bush and his rich cronies. The rich got their tax break leaving the rest of us to pick up the tab (and our soldiers to pay the ultimate sacrifice). The Democrats should demand the repeal of the tax break for the rich and insist that all "American companies" involved in the rebuilding efforts pay taxes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-03 12:06 AM
Response to Original message
12. Well done, Will
I am still convinced that a Shaman put a curse on the word Iraq so that neither Mr. Bush nor any of this senior aides can utter a truthful statement containing it.

The Middle East will either become a place of progress and peace, or it will be an exporter of violence and terror that takes more lives in America and in other free nations.

Ah, yes! Here we have another example of that hallmark of Dubyaspeak, the false dichotomy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yavin4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-03 12:08 AM
Response to Original message
13. FIVE TIMES!!! FIVE TIMES!!!
In that speech, he made a connection between Iraq and 9/11. Five f*ucking times in a 15 minute speech. That's an Iraq==9/11 connection every three minutes!!!! And you wonder why over 70% of the American people believe that Iraq was behind 9/11.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demigoddess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-03 12:13 AM
Response to Original message
14. George I and George II speak as if they think all they have to do is
say something in a firm voice and all the country will fall in line and believe the biggest fib in the world. All those pauses were to allow us time to cheer and bellow our approval. george II really wants to be queen not president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kodi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-03 12:14 AM
Response to Original message
15. Mr. Pitt...."If we don't fight the Vietcong in the jungles of Indochina,
"If we don't fight the Vietcong in the jungles of Indochina, we will have to fight them on the beaches of California."

sound a bit like>>>>>>>>>>>>??????

"We are fighting that enemy in Iraq and Afghanistan today so that we do not meet him again on our own streets, in our own cities."


only the names of the places have been changed where we invade to protect our "interests."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-03 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. Scaring the sh*t outta me man...
Brought back some memories and it'slike history is playing out all over again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
markses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-03 12:15 AM
Response to Original message
16. Nice job
Just for future reference, "Deutschland uber alles" does not mean "Germany over all" as in "all other countries." Rather, it means "Germany over all" referring to the various principalities and "German" states out of which the nation state of Germany was formed. The song was written in the 1870's. So, if you were a Bavarian, you became a German.

In fact, it has the approximate meaning of "E Pluribus Unum."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConsAreLiars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-03 12:50 AM
Response to Reply #16
21. Didn't the meaning change?
The common meanings of words and phrases usually change as social conditions change.

It's my understanding that this was later used as a part of the Third Reich propaganda. I thought that its meaning became more chauvinistic and carried connotations of Aryan superiority and "imperial destiny." More like "We're Number One" in the US has become than the implication of "unity in diversity" carried by "e pluribus unum."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generic Other Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-03 12:19 AM
Response to Original message
18. So the speech was worse than the made-for-tv movie?
Nice marginalia, Will. I know it's hard to do when you are splitting a gut laughing...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-03 12:19 AM
Response to Original message
19. Ha ha ha ..Yep that about sums it up !
:D ..:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pfitz59 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-03 12:27 AM
Response to Original message
20. WMDs? Where are the Weapons aimed at America?
He steered clear of any mention of WMD's. Speech was all about "terra", and oh yes, "This is a stickup!" He's just a thieving weasel. $87 billion straight into the pockets of his most generous supporters! What do you think those secret "campaign events" were all about this summer! Payback time! Lying POS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-03 12:51 AM
Response to Original message
22. Thanks for the Translation
Obviously, this was too well written to be anything that Bush could attempt, but I want to commend you on your ability to translate liespeak.

You should publish this far and wide....the time is past to let this bullshit go without challenge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-03 12:57 AM
Response to Original message
23. This speech went over like a lead balloon internationally
Note, this is just judging by the coverage this morning. The only significant fact the foreign media saw coming out of this speech was the request for $87Billion.

I can't see that number going down well at home either!

This speech was supposed to stop the bleeding.

Instead, we may lose the patient.

And that's not a bad thing, metaphorically speaking. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RevolutionStartsNow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-03 01:13 AM
Response to Original message
24. Brilliant, Will
I didn't hear the speech (was a little busy hanging out with Gov. Dean in San Jose...) but this is much better.

The connections between 9/11 and Iraq are outrageous. I think now maybe 90% of America will believe this shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kat 333 Donating Member (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-03 01:31 AM
Response to Original message
25. "Please help please help we're so fucked please o please help"
HaHaHaHahHaHah .............

Purrrfect

:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snyttri Donating Member (488 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-03 02:32 AM
Response to Original message
26. Thanks for the analysis. The distortions all run together and it's ...
difficult to see the structure and the strategy of the talking points without a scorecard.

I wish anchors would point out the irony that the only justification alive for the war is bettering the lives of Iraqis by removing a despot; yet the neo=cons now brag that it was their plan to make Iraq a magnet for the world's terrorists all along (better to fight them in Iraq than here}.

Thanks for the car bombs. You shouldn't have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WaterDog Donating Member (125 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-03 02:54 AM
Response to Original message
27. Do you think....
"I see it," he said, "in the eyes of a hungry people every day here. They are starved for freedom and opportunity." And he concluded, "I just thought you'd like a note from the `front lines of freedom.' "


Do you think this Army captain could be another figment of the imagination?

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BonjourUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-03 03:24 AM
Response to Original message
28. It's the most surrealist speech I never heard !!
The french TVs only showed a few moments of this Bush derilirium. Thank you for your transcription.

Bush looks like a kid who has done a big stupidity and tries to justify it and asks for help of adults for fixing. Often the kids lie not to be reprimanded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dean4america Donating Member (390 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-03 04:40 AM
Response to Original message
29. *bow*
helluva post, Will Pitt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GalleryGod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-03 05:37 AM
Response to Original message
30. The Old He Coon,Bob Byrd, got it right the FIRST $50B was....
A Friggin' DOWN PAYMENT!!!!!!!

What could WE do with an Unfettered $87BILLION dollars?
Schools
Roads
Municipal Water Supplies
Cops-on-the-Street

Ah,fuck it!

Pack yer shit up,Asswipe!
It's Back to Crawford for You!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheesehead Donating Member (344 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-03 07:12 AM
Response to Original message
32. It's clear that the anger grows as the speech progresses
This is the same response I have when listening. The epithets hurled at the TV image of this idiot get more and more pointed as the manure pile grows.

I notice this same escalation of contempt in your commentary, Will. The effect is cumulative - disgust starts at the baseline level established by the last affront to intelligence and civility and grows exponentially from there as the bullshit accumulates.

If Whistle Ass gave Clinton-length speeches, he would probably be physically attacked by apalled listeners who "just couldn't take it anymore" at some point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GOPisEvil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-03 07:40 AM
Response to Original message
33. 500 tons = 1,000,000 lbs.
George you are lieing pile of pig feces. I'm more threatened by YOU than by anyone else. People like YOU are the reason we're hated 'round the world. You arrogant fucking prick! Now you want ME to fork over MY money to clean up YOUR mess. Oh, and by the way, way to go admitting that you had NO PLAN to fix Iraq after the invasion...asshole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SnohoDem Donating Member (915 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-03 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
34. Kick for us west coasters
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DinahMoeHum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-03 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
35. Thanks, Will. I confess I didn't watch the speech last night. . .
because I'm sick and tired of seeing that smirking chimpanzee ass-face. Heck, whenever I'm watching the news these days, I use the remote and put on "Mute" when * is on.

I turned off the TV at 8:30 pm and put the radio onto ESPN for the Sunday night football game.

:evilfrown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-03 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
36. Well done! If I may add....
...One comment my wife made during the speech:

Bush: "The terrorists became convinced that free nations were decadent and weak. And they grew bolder, believing that history was on their side."

My wife:

"Ah, no. That was God, or Allah, that was on their side...." :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capn Sunshine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-03 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
37. kick
excellent Will
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-03 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
38. What do you mean "we", paleface?
Edited on Mon Sep-08-03 10:33 AM by rocknation
YOU arranged it so that YOU would have carte blanche to wage this war, not account for its cost, blow off the UN, scrap the Geneva convention, and get cushy no-bid contracting deals for your campaign-contributing friends. Now that it's all coming back to bite you, suddenly it's OUR problem???

Great job, Will, but I think I can analyze his speech a little more succintly:

PLEEEEAAAAAASE DON'T FIRE ME!!!



rocknation

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quilp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-03 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
39. Yahhh!!! You are just plagairizing Fox News
Han-Nitty, Hu-Me?, Kud-Low, Kon-Ratty, and O-Really have already made all these points. Haven't they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Narraback Donating Member (510 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-03 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
40. Kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC