franksumatra
(270 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-17-05 07:41 PM
Original message |
U.S. going into Iran?..Nah..No Way..or are we?...Nonsense...don't be silly |
|
Talking heads all day on t.v. talking about Sy Hersh's article, but the pentagon officials deny deny deny.
If you ain't scared yet, you ain't payin' attention.
|
Inland
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-17-05 07:43 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Like I said, the only thing stopping the Iran invasion is that |
|
it would be idiotic and the invasion would fail.
Of course, Bush has no fear or recognition of the idiotic and failure.
|
bahrbearian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-17-05 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
4. It will be bombing and cruise missiles. |
|
The amerikan public can get behind that.
|
Inland
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-17-05 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
7. It won't, because the Iranian nuke program |
|
can't be taken out with cruise missiles or bombing.
Moreover, a declaration of war against Iran would lead to justified attacks on Americans in Iraq. Whether that would legally include arming insurgent groups or not, it could be done with impunity.
In the meantime, Iran would end UN inspections of its nuke facilities and accelerate and complete its nuke program.
Bush would look foolish and weak as he talks of how dangerous Iran is (the usual Bush there is a crisis quick give me authority tactic) while failing to do anything except lose Iraq.
|
bahrbearian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-17-05 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
10. "We can take em out, With Curise Missles and Bombing." |
|
Your taking about a " War Chimp " aren't ya.
|
Deja Q
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-17-05 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
11. Never mind Iraq oil fields that will be crushed when the US leaves, AND |
|
the moment we attack Iran, they will likely use nukes. Would they take any chances? They are a rogue nation, but they've got chutzpah...
|
bahrbearian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-17-05 07:44 PM
Response to Original message |
2. We won't be sending ground troops in. |
yourout
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-17-05 07:44 PM
Response to Original message |
3. If we go in it will likely spark WWIII.. |
|
If we invade Iran someone will end up nuked and after the first one goes off it will only be a matter of time till the end everyone and everything.
|
bahrbearian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-17-05 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
6. No we'll just be bombing Nuuuclear Facccilities. |
|
Weapons of mass Desrtcution. The rest of the world is just going too have to fall in line, like Libya, which is our greatest sucess.
|
OneTwentyoNine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-17-05 07:47 PM
Response to Original message |
5. If Dem Senators/Reps support it with troops and money I switch parties.... |
bahrbearian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-17-05 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
8. They already gave Chimpy the power . IWR |
|
Edited on Mon Jan-17-05 07:52 PM by bahrbearian
|
jbane
(668 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-17-05 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
13. If our guys support this we don't have a party... |
|
I hope someone has the balls to stop this. I have a hard time believing he would go to Iran.
|
nadinbrzezinski
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-17-05 07:53 PM
Response to Original message |
9. why do you hate your country so much? End of sarcasm |
|
But I can hear the freeps saying this...
On the bright side... this will lead to the draft... and I think our freeps will ... enjoy their all expense trip to Tehran...
|
pinto
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-17-05 08:15 PM
Response to Original message |
12. I read Sy's piece to mean bombing plans against supposed nuke facilities. |
|
Edited on Mon Jan-17-05 08:20 PM by pinto
Not invasion plans. I would guess we've been planning this for a while....
Lots of chatter on TV about this as a leak to up the stakes either between
>CIA and Dept of Defense camps re: intel leadership,
>EU and US camps re: negotiations and the role of the UN,
>US and Iranian camps re: lack of negotiations,
>or all of the above....
:shrug:
Just wanted to make that small point on the issue.
(on edit)
"surgical air strikes" (what a phrase)would seem a likely part of the Rumsfeld/Feith world view.
|
Gman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-17-05 08:36 PM
Response to Original message |
14. Whoever makes cruise missles must need a 1Q bump in their financials |
|
so Bush is going to accomodate them.
It's all about the money.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:15 AM
Response to Original message |