I'm sure many of you are already familiar with Atrios's wingnut debate dictionary. An attempted discussion with a right-winger at a party the other night reminded me of just how accurate it is:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=post&forum=104Some favorites:
"anorecdotalism: when presented with statistics, they respond with a story about meeting an anonymous little old lady @ bus stop or grocery store & whatever she told them is more credible than ANY kind of facts or figures we can provide"
"deus ex rectum: when arguing an increasingly unsupportable position, one suddenly and out of nowhere pulls a totally non-sequitur BS long-discredited right-wing meme out of one's ass."
"Plain-Folk Argument - Accusing your opponent of being an ivory-tower dwelling elitist because they don't watch Nascar or listen to country music, or because they do enjoy lattes, wine, and classical music. Arguments about personal taste and their unimportance in political debate are not a valid comeback."
"Vaccingating: The process of accusing your opponent of doing what you're already doing in an effort to prevent your opponent from being the first to make that accusation."