Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FACT: Bush was AWOL, regardless of "memo-gate"...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
RBHam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 04:50 AM
Original message
FACT: Bush was AWOL, regardless of "memo-gate"...
by kos
Wed Jan 12th, 2005 at 10:22:14 PST

With all the wingnut crowing about CBS and 60 Minutes, you'd think they blew the story that Bush had been AWOL. Fact is, CBS got one piece of evidence wrong, from a whole truckload of evidence.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2005/1/12/132214/106
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JohnnyRingo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 05:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yep...I expect to hear it if his service record ever comes up again
They'll say: "Those documents were discredited as forgeries!"

As if that means he did a six year gig.
Bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Racenut20 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 05:08 AM
Response to Original message
2. The "real" truth, as my protest sign reads
30 + = DESERTION !!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 05:23 AM
Response to Original message
3. It has not been proved that the memos were not authentic.
It's not a 'fact' that CBS got a piece of the evidence wrong. The independent investigation did not find that the memos were not authentic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 05:31 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. But most people aren't going to believe you.
All they heard was the words "memo" and "fraud". Rove was highly successful in burying Bush's AWOL status.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBHam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 05:40 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. The "Big Lie" theory...
Repeat it loudly enough and often enough...

Exactly.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AliciaKeyedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 07:14 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Even CBS doesn't believe their own memos now
That doesn't invalidate the story, but it did so to most Americans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flobee1kenobi Donating Member (302 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 07:23 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. I had to "correct" a repug yesterday
when he started spouting the forgery claim. The first question was:
-Did you actually wath the program that started this whole fiasco?
--Uh.......no, I heard about it on the radio

All they get are soundbites and they call it news
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 07:27 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. But you're ready to supply the facts, aren't you?
The FACT that Bush Sr used his political position to get his little boy a safe place to avoid Vietnam. And the FACT that little Bushie couldn't even hack the Battle of Ellington.

Both these facts have been known a long time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flobee1kenobi Donating Member (302 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 07:31 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. factual eqivalent of a kill shot
The secretary that wrote the original memo stated that all the information in Dan's memo was correct.....

That one ended the debate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AliciaKeyedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 07:46 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Yes, I am
I don't doubt the story, but CBS screwed it up royally.

And now, thanks to their poor journalism, most of America not only doubts that story, but anything else CBS or other media report.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. CBS was set up by Rove. It was very clever and very effective.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. I disagree that CBS screwed up
Edited on Tue Jan-18-05 08:46 AM by yardwork
I watched the original show and followed the whole thing very closely. Within minutes of the telecast, rightwing attorneys in Atlanta pretending to be good old boys had posted detailed technical exposes on Free Republic, which, unaccountably, got picked up by the MSM within hours.

Trouble is, the technical "facts" were wrong. The memos may be fakes but if they are it's not for the reasons that "Buckhead" gave on FR, "reasons" that had obviously been supplied to him before-hand by Rove. CBS shared the memos with the WH and asked them to respond 24 hours before the telecast. Rove set Rather up by refusing to question the veracity of the memos before the telecast, then ambushing Rather immeditely afterwards.

There is reason to believe that the memos were originally forged by Rove operatives, years ago, and dangled like bait in front of first Gore and then Kerry. Rather finally took the bait.

Lost in all the intrigue is the fact that not one detail of the memos is considered untrue!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
11. Yes. This was a real creative way to get rid of that whole segment
of Bush's worthless life. And our media, once again, allowed it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
14. Corporate McPravda is OWNED by the Bush Gang
The Bush Rule of Journalism

By Robert Parry
January 17, 2005

“Don’t take on the Bushes” is becoming an unwritten rule in American journalism. Reporters can make mistakes in covering other politicians and suffer little or no consequence, but a false step when doing a critical piece on the Bushes is a career killer.

The latest to learn this hard lesson are four producers at CBS, who demonstrated inadequate care in checking out memos purportedly written by George W. Bush’s commanding officer in the Texas Air National Guard in the early 1970s. For this sloppiness, CBS fired the four, including Mary Mapes who helped break last year’s Abu Ghraib torture scandal.

A painful irony for the CBS producers was that the central points of the memos – that Bush had blown off a required flight physical and was getting favored treatment in the National Guard – were already known, and indeed, were confirmed by the commander’s secretary in a follow-up interview with CBS. But even honest mistakes are firing offenses when the Bushes are involved.

By contrast, journalists understand that they get a free shot at many other politicians who don’t have the protective infrastructure that surrounds the Bush family. Take for example the case of reporters for the New York Times and the Washington Post who misquoted Al Gore about his role in the Love Canal toxic waste clean-up.

'Delusional'

The misquote in late 1999 prompted knee-slapping commentaries across the country calling Gore “delusional” because he supposedly had falsely claimed credit for the Love Canal clean-up by saying “I was the one that started it all.” But Gore actually had said, “that was the one that started it all,” referring to a similar toxic waste case in Toone, Tennessee.

CONTINUED...

http://www.consortiumnews.com/2005/011705.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC