Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Where did cain and able's wives come from?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Mizmoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 11:29 AM
Original message
Where did cain and able's wives come from?
I was wondering, does anyone know what these Creationist types say when asked where cain and able's wives came from? It's a pretty obvious plot flaw in Genesis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
1. I am guessing they were all relatives? But then, I don't
subscribe to a literal view of the scriptures in many cases.

------------------------------------
Would Jesus love a liberal? You bet!
http://timeforachange.bluelemur.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ET Awful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
2. Not really, the commonly accepted belief is that their wives were
their sisters, and that such was acceptable in those times, being as there were no other human beings around and all :).

Of course, the leprechauns and the fairies were hiding in the trees, and the unicorns were shocked at such crass incestuous behavior :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
okieinpain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
61. oh lordy, and what would god think of such behavior.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
3. Abel didn't have a wife...
Cain offed him before he could get hitched...then Cain went off to the Land of Nod, where apparently there was another god in charge and a separate creation, or something...it's not too clear there, but it seems like ol' YHVH's domain didn't extend very far in those days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
okieinpain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
62. damn you, I shit my pants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noonwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
4. Cain found his wife in the Land of Nod
East of Eden, after he was banished for killing his brother. Did Abel have a wife? I though Cain killed him before he did.

Obviously, the tale of creation and the tale of the fall of man in Genesis are allegories, not fundamental facts. There are a few other holes in the story, like two different tellings of the creation, one that has Eve being created from Adam's rib, and the other just stating that God created them all, male and female alike.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phylny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #4
71. I believe that since Jesus spoke in parables,
that is, he told stories to illustrate his points, that God would as well.

So, I have no problem believing that God created everything, but did it in his own time. I'm not scholarly, but I believe Genesis is told much like a parable, a story to illustrate. It's much better storytelling to say that it happened in six days...millions (billions?) of years seems more like it, yes?

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
5. She had evolved from a monkey, I think.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
6. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
UdoKier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Wow, poor Eve.
"thirty-three sons and twenty-three daughters."

Talk about a baby machine...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BiggJawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #9
23. Year, but they were spread out over a few hundred years...
It's not like J. S. Bach birthing his first wife to death after a dozen kids, then having another dozen with his second wife in less than a century....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UdoKier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #23
36. Not that I actually believe they really had that many kids.
or that they really lived that long.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #23
45. Not true about Bach
His first wife (Maria Barbara) had seven children, and she died not in childbirth, but of some severe illness.

His second wife (Anna Magdelena) had thirteen children and outlived him.

Only about half of the twenty children lived to adulthood.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BiggJawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #45
60. That's what I get for not refreshing my memory....
Edited on Tue Jan-18-05 01:33 PM by BiggJawn
Thanks, Lydia...But you gotta agree, having that many kids in about 20 years or less would be worse than spreading 4X as many out over several HUNDRED years! :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #9
42. NO TV in those days I guess.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mizmoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. Pretty disatisfying double-talk
but I guess there is no real answer since it's all a creation myth anyway

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Mizmoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #15
20. I don't believe the world is flat
or that it's the center of the universe either. Do you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WoodrowFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #20
46. too late, he's gone
ok, who had 14 posts in the poll?? (I had 12, damn it).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UdoKier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #15
24. God help you...
if you're incapable of imagining a universe touched by the hand of a higher power without the story going EXACTLY as described in genesis.

Even many of the Catholic high priesthood recognize that the creation story and other parables are just storied for teach ing a lesson, and not to be taken literally. That doesn't make them atheists.

How sad it must be to have such a narrow range of possibilities in your mind.



BTW, want some some pizza?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoping4Change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #15
34. And where in the Creation story is there any indication of
Intelligent Design? What's intelligent about relatives screwing each other for 400 years?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #12
18. If it's just a myth
Why the strenuous efforts to prove it wrong?

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mizmoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #18
22. Because of the strenuous efforts to impose it on me
if you people would keep it in your church I wouldn't care about it at all
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #22
25. Hmmmmm
Atheists complaining about persecution and Christians complaining about persecution sound more or less the same to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mizmoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #25
29. Persecution? Wha?
??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #29
30. So you don't think that Christians are imposing their religion on you?
I thought that is what you said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #30
37. I think she's asking who's persecuting Christians?
I think it's a fair question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. Well that's my point
Some Atheists feel that Christians are imposing their beliefs on them or persecuting them, and some Christians feel that Atheists are imposing their beliefs on them or persecuting them.

I don't really see either argument myself--I mean isolated cases I see, and more on the Atheist side, but in general I dont' see it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WoodrowFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #39
43. I don't either
I can see both sides in isolated cases, but both sides sometimes seem to be determined to be offended. Some atheists seem to think that any mention of Christianity that's not in a church between 11 am and noon on Sunday is stuffing religion down their throat and some Christians seem to think if they can't teach the 1611 KJV in every class in the county that THEY'RE being oppressed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #39
44. Christians are imposing their beliefs on them
in Dover, Pennsylvania, for instance. On our coins. In the pledge. Our fellow Americans have also made it plain that we can't run for most elected offices and be honest our beliefs. Is that persecution? I wouldn't call it that. But it is a double standard. We are second class citizens in our own country. We can't take our rights for granted the way most Christians can.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fifth of Five Donating Member (241 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #44
68. Bravo!
Second class citizens - that's it exactly. We seem to be automatically disqualified for public office. Why someone's religion (or lack thereof)is seen as more important than the person's position on issues is beyond me, but it absolutely is to a large portion of the population where I live.

Being "active in his/her church" is a required line item on any candidate's resume.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phylny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #44
72. Not this Christian.
It wouldn't bother me one bit if every reference to God was removed from our money, pledges, you name it.

Just as you want to be free to believe as you do, I want you to have that freedom, free of harassment.

I want to be free to believe what I believe, and I don't need money, or other people, to state it or believe it with me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mizmoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #30
38. Impose is not the same as persecute
But you knew that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #22
27. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #27
28. Who do you mean by "we?"
Out of curiosity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #27
32. And more than 85% of medieval Europeans believed the earth was flat.
Doesn't mean they were right. Belief and knowledge are quite different.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mizmoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #27
33. Your church has rights coming out of its ass
It has the right to teach anything it wants.
It can have its own building and even a school. Hell, it can have dozens of schools.
You can send your kids there for a religious education.
You can teach them that the universe was created by magic ferrets if you'd like.

The one think you can't do is impose your ferret religion on me and my family. We're busy worshipping rabbits, thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #6
21. Cain found his wife in the land of Nod, east of Eden
Adam and Eve were the ancestors of the Jews. The rest of us were already here, apparently. If Adam and Eve were anything, they were the Rousseauvian ideal of the noble savage, born into a protected environment, free from the possibilities of greed and want until Adam got jealous of Eve's ability to eat fruit of knowledge that was forbidden him and got them both kicked out into the cold, cruel world.

By the way, incestuous marriages were not forbidden by god in Mosaic law. That was something the priestly class came up with, along with all that other stuff in Leviticus, like killing children who sass you and not wearing mixed fibre clothing.

It's all there in the Bowdlerized history we call the Old Testament, but sometimes you need to read between the lines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UdoKier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
7. They were Cain and Abel's sisters.
You didn't know that we're all children of incest?

Silly You.

God was so all-powerful that he could make the whole world in 6 days, but he couldn't be bothered to make another couple to provide for a more diverse gene pool.

How appropriate that it's mostly folks in the rural south who insist on believing in a LITERAL interpretation of the creation FABLE.

(cue dueling banjos music)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Ewwww! I'll take being descended from monkeys over incest any day!
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WoodrowFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
8. from Answersingenesis
you owe me a beer for going to that site to find this...

Cain’s brothers and sisters
Cain was the first child of Adam and Eve recorded in Scripture (Genesis 4:1). His brothers, Abel (Genesis 4:2) and Seth (Genesis 4:25), were part of the first generation of children ever born on this Earth.

Even though only these three males are mentioned by name, Adam and Eve had other children. In Genesis 5:4 a statement sums up the life of Adam and Eve—‘And the days of Adam after he had fathered Seth were eight hundred years. And he fathered sons and daughters.’ This does not say when they were born. Many could have been born in the 130 years (Genesis 5:3) before Seth was born.

During their lives, Adam and Eve had a number of male and female children. The Jewish historian Josephus wrote that, ‘The number of Adam’s children, as says the old tradition, was thirty-three sons and twenty-three daughters.’11

The Bible does not tell us how many children were born to Adam and Eve. However, considering their long life spans (Adam lived for 930 years—Genesis 5:5), it would seem reasonable to suggest there were many! Remember, they were commanded to ‘Be fruitful, and multiply’ (Genesis 1:28).

The wife
If we now work totally from Scripture, without any personal prejudices or other extra-Biblical ideas, then back at the beginning, when there was only the first generation, brothers would have had to have married sisters or there would be no more generations!

We are not told when Cain married or any of the details of other marriages and children, but we can say for certain that some brothers had to marry their sisters at the beginning of human history.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mizmoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #8
14. as I said to the above poster
pretty disatisfying drivel in place of a real explanation

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WoodrowFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. no, it works
but damn, Cain had to wait awhile didn't he. Even if they did marry at 13. Of course you realize what this means, right? Eden was in West Virginia!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #8
49. Seems Original Sin would be found in that 1st generation.
Maybe the scribes doing the news back then got it wrong. That would explain a lot. I wonder why God didn't think of that when he created Adam and Eve? He should have ordered up at least one other couple, maybe Bill and Jane, to address that flawed creation plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
11. apparently there's always been a split
between god's people and those of the common man (people like me, I guess).

However, I found a page for you that explains it in the "Fundie Way" at
http://www.christiananswers.net/q-aig/aig-c004.html

Of course, this explanation completely ignores Lilith, Adam's first wife. So, it is in keeping with their usual philosophy, i.e. "if it doesn't fit, ignore it."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WoodrowFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #11
17. Lilith
Lilith isn't exactly Biblical so they can ignore her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #17
26. But didn't they all start out as Jewish?
and the first five books of their religion = The Torah.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WoodrowFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #26
35. yeah but
It's not in Genesis, it's more of a Jewish myth, part of an amplification of Genesis. Modern Christains don't use those additions so it's not Biblical so fundys don't HAVE to explain her. In other words, she is referenced in the Talmud, not the Torah.

http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/~humm/Topics/Lilith/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #35
50. I know
I was just highlighting how they pick and choose their information and disregard/dismiss anything that doesn't fit their fantasy-world.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ArkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
13. The real question isn't where from but how often.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsTryska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
19. I just thought they got them from pagan goat worshiping
non-jewish tribes that hung out in the next oasis over.



remember genesis is after all only the Judeo-christian Origin myth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peekaloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
31. they rode in on dinosaurs!
:silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WoodrowFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #31
56. Cain married Alley Oop??
Now I am confused..





BTW, this graphic comes from a site that WOULD argue exactly that! that they rode dinosaurs!! :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
40. I've also heard fundies...
say that God created others after Adam and Eve and THAT's where the wives came from...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
41. Sisters?
Marrying your sister in ancient times was often an acceptable practice. The patriarch Abraham's wife Sara was his half-sister.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #41
47. Pure undiluted poppycock.... Josphesus is reffered to but investigations
show he was a fraud figure.

Noah traveled all over the World capturing animals and birds from all the Continents and Islands and Oceans/Seas.

Then, after FLOOD and landing, all the animals and birds had to find their way to their present lands.

Marrying sisters/brothers is an explanation....of the story told. Was it true? Perhaps. we will never know. Hormones being Hormones, I guess it has some semblence of truth ....

How many stones was in Davids Pouch as he approached Goliath?

The answer in next weeks edition of Brother/Sister Love Tales.

Come, we go thimk
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #47
48. LOL
Yeah, I was playing along for the sake of argument. Actually, this was an explanation a nun gave us in religion class. She also said that back then not only incestuous relations with sisters were permitted by God, but polygamous marriages as well because of the need to populate the earth. God did draw the line at father and daughter unions though as evidenced in the story of Lot and his daughters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #48
52. This is 2005, we are in the NUKE AGE, the TECH AGE.....
we have inquiring minds, systems allowing the AIRBUS to carry 800 passengers, flights to the moon, missions to Mars, Jupiter, Pluto, and beyond.

This is the AGE of REason, when Sanity/Reality meets Fantasy and DElusion.... The Real war is an ONGOING battle for the hearts and minds of the masses out there....

come, we go read a thread that includes this part.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #47
64. Genetic mytochondrial evidence suggests otherwise
The genetic bottleneck a single pair such as Adam and Eve would create would show up in the genetic records rather strongly. There is evidence of a bottleneck that decreased the human population to a very low number at some point. But it is no where near 1 breeding couple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrWeird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
51. They married Cinderella's evil step sisters.
Little known fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WoodrowFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #51
53. ewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww
the ugly step sisters? Even the one that looked and sounded like Larry king??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
54. Nod
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
55. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
57. Everything You Know Is Wrong
Thank you,

Firesign Theatre
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RetroLounge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
58. Yeah, I asked the same question in Sunday School
when I was about 10. I was toldby the obviously upset pastor to shut up and quit being a smart-aleck. Plus they talked to my parents. I walked away from the Church immediately and have never regretted it.

I mean, if a question posed by a 10 yr old shakes your religious foundation, then maybe you need a more well-thought-out myth.

RL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
59. Easy Answer
They were made by the great big invisible man in the sky.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hobo Donating Member (452 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
63. You are not supposed
to ask that question.


Hobo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
65. The Moon!
There was a whole lotta inscest lovin' goin' on in the bible. At least early on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buns_of_Fire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #65
66. Apparently, they were begatting their brains out
for those first few centuries! :wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
67. Two theories
1). Cain's wife was his sister. (Able didn't have a wife as far as we know).

2). It's possible that there were people outside the Garden.

But the key to understanding the Genesis story is that once Man fell, all the rules for Man immediately changed. Man was apparently meant to life in a perfect, peaceful state for all eternity. After the Fall, all the rules immediately changed. So maybe God created more people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
69. Well...your post immediately suggested "Inherit the Wind"
and the following exchange between the fictional Henry Drummond and Matthew Brady (literary counterparts to the real-life lawyers in the Scopes Trial, Clarence Darrow and William Jennings Bryan):

Drummond: Now, now listen to this. This is Genesis 4 to 16: "And Cain went out from the presence of the Lord and dwelt in the land of Nod, on the east of Eden. And Cain knew his wife." Now where the hell did she come from?

Brady: Who?

Drummond: Mrs. Cain. Cain's wife. If, in the beginning, there were just Cain and Abel, and Adam and Even, where did this extra woman come from? Did you ever stop to think about that?

Brady: No, sir. I leave the agnostics to hunt for her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nobody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
70. What I'd like to know is...
If we're all descended from two people, that makes us all family, right? Why the hell don't people get along better than we do? Even if you hate your brother or sister, most people would still stick up for them.

Somehow the creation myth doesn't do much more than blaming women for all that is wrong with the world. (to be fair, the ancient Greeks did it too. Their creation myth didn't even have female humans until Zeus created Pandora)

Back to my original point. If we're all supposed to be siblings, we certainly don't act like it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
73. Jersey???
:silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC