Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Does Condi have to pass a drug test?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 02:13 PM
Original message
Does Condi have to pass a drug test?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RoeBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. Does her toothy smile bother you?
I don't get what you're going for here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsTryska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. dude her eyes are slits. she's stoned out of her gourd. nt
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoeBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. That is stupid and insulting
for you to suggest that an African-American woman would go in front of Congress high on drugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsTryska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. what does that have to do with her race?
people of all races love pot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrWeird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. defending Condaleeza Rice is stupid and insulting...
especially when you cry racism while doing so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoeBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Would you care to point out where I..
defended her? Or are you really <insert insult here> enough to believe that she was high on pot during taht hearing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sui generis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. oh lighten up
jeezus
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoeBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. That's a common response
...tell a dirty joke in front of a woman at work

"oh lighten up"

tell an ethnic joke

"oh lighten up"

You'd think this kind of thing wouldn't happen here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrWeird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. It doesn't.
Somebody's playing a "caption the picture' joke with an evil, disgusting excuse for a human being.

You'd think that "if you attack Condaleeza Rice you're a racist" thing wouldn't happen here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsTryska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #14
27. i'm sorry - where was the ethnic joke?
i think your comments reflect back on your own racial issues, because everyone else is talking about the fact that she looks like she smoked a big old joint or perhaps snorted some nitrous in that shot.



you're the one harping on race, so i must ask - why is that exactly? do only black people do drugs?

why is it so important that we all notice that she's black? are you having trouble getting past the color of her skin, to be able to see the uhh...content of her character?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrWeird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Well, I assumed you were being sarcastic, not actually defending her.
I mean, you'd have to be a rightwing nutjob to get upset by somebody pointing out that she looks like she's stoned out of her gourd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoeBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. No you'd have to be a
right wing nut job to defend her policies. To defend her
appearance is another matter entirely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrWeird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Yeah, yeah, yeah.
keep digging that hole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoeBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. You're the one
with the shovel in your hands. I'm just pointing out to you your insensitivity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrWeird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. What you're doing is making phony allegations of bigotry.
Apparently for no other purpose for being disruptive.

And one has to be pretty insensitive to be doing that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sui generis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. a circular firing squad is bad enough
without people volunteering to step in front of the guns.

I think you are either intentionally misconstruing here or you are being disruptive.

Nobody here is a racist or a bigot (with the exception of some of our perennial freeper lurkers).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoeBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. If everyone would stick to
discussing her poor record as National Security Advisor that would be great. But we immediately desended into discussing her appearance and suggested that she looks high while answering questions in front of congress. That crossed the line- if you don't understand that you have along way to develope as a person.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sui generis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. okay dude
Edited on Tue Jan-18-05 04:11 PM by sui generis
you are clearly the underevolved person here.

How dare you run around pissing and moaning about a joke, and then calling people names? You are disruptive. Are you having a bad day? Try again tomorrow.

Yes she has a poor record as a national security advisor, and yes she looked stoned. Both, at the same time.

Only an evolved person can grasp duality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. It's a fucking joke
for god's sake. Do you really not understand that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
21. No no that is EXACTLY what I meant
and of course it is because she is black OF COURSE!!!!

I apologize if this upset you I really didn't mean it that way. It was just a Goof on Condi type thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
4. i think thats her
"i`m going to claw your eyes out look" -hint to the rest of the world-if condi looks this way when she arrives in your country you are next on bush`s list
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
6. oh except the one pill adminstration takes twice a day
that we dont know what it is....loll lol or that pill powell was talking they all take
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
devilgrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
8. Tee hee hee hee... the worst terrorist attack happened under my nose...
isn't it a scream? Tee hee hee hee.

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glarius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
9.  Boxer used Condi's OWN WORDS to prove she is a LIAR!
No matter how Condi tried to obscure the facts, she could NOT dispute what Boxer quoted to her!....I've finally seen someone speak out with some guts!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sui generis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
10. Alfred E. Neuman and Condi - Separated at Birth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. Looks like Shrub
before the operation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
19. I've never seen a politcal appointee subjected to testing
I suppose it could happen, but I don't think they get put on "the list." The way they do it is by last number of the SSAN, and I have never, ever seen a single political appointee in line for the bottle...

For whatever that is worth....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsTryska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #19
28. that actually explains a lot.
alot of the members of capitol hill is cracked out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. They don't piss test the elected Hill, just the military and the
...civil service employees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsTryska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #30
31. man i just saw my grammar in that post above....
i might have been cracked out. thanks for honoring me with a reply anyway. :D


it is ironic tho isn't it? that we don't piss test the people that are making our laws and handling our money?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. Hey, I don't always check my posts before I hit send, either!
I find it interesting that we give these lawmakers full rights of free citizens, but we deny those same rights to certain sectors of society because of their "public responsibility." I guess they figure the Congress and political appointees aren't publicly very responsible!!!

No one argues very hard about making school bus drivers take drug tests, because they are hauling little kids around. Same with the military--you don't want a bunch of stoners loading weapons on a flight line. Same with airline pilots, ferry boat conductors, anyone in transportation, really...but when it comes to our money, go ahead and snort coke before going in to debate that bill!

Of course, no one reads the damn bills anyway!!! (As John Conyers told us all in F-911.) I guess we're just...what's the word?....SCREWED!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burn the bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
29. i think they all should be required to pass frequent drug tests n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrWeird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #29
33. And standardized school exams.
With their scores posted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzybeans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
34. For those of us
with squinty eyes I'm offended. ;-) This thread is funny in itself. I'm still looking for the racial part of the joke. Perhaps its over there next to the bong. :smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC