Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Idea I Had Last Night....Derailing Condi's Nomination

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
journalist3072 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 08:44 AM
Original message
Idea I Had Last Night....Derailing Condi's Nomination
OK, so I had this idea for derailing Condi's nomination, but I'm not sure if this is possible, under Senate rules.

I was thinking what if, after Condi's nomination gets reporting out of the Foreign Relations Committee and to the full Senate, Barbara Boxer filibusters the nomination. Would it be possible for her to do that?

I was thinking maybe Boxer could filibuster the Condi nomination. If she could, would that kill the nomination forever,and force Shrub to choose someone else?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Spinzonner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. I doubt enough Democrats and moderate Republicans would block a Cloture
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
2. She could, but likely would commit political suicide
What I'd like to see is the Congress employing the democratic process. If the Democrats, as a minority, won't be able to vote it down, then so be it. But this, "I'll be voting in support" preface before throwing softball questions just makes them look petty when they start voicing real criticisms after she's sworn in.

Hey Congress! Yoo Hoo!! Vote NO and stick with bringing the sunshine onto the failures and mistakes! THAT'S showing 'resolve'!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
3. She could only put it off
A single Senator can filibuster only so long as they can stand and talk. Once she is forced to yield the floor due to fatigue, the filibuster is over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Earth_First Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Someone get that woman a cup of coffee...
It's the 4-year fillibuster time!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. No, they can invoke cloture to make her stop talking.
It only takes 60 votes, and I guarantee the Dems aren't willing to filibuster Condi.

You have to use the filibuster sparingly, and so you use it for the permanent damage positions - the court appointees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. Not unless she yields the floor, two different types of filibusters
and yes, she can refuse to yield the floor to allow them to invoke cloture. The problem is, if she collapses from fatigue, that is considered a yielding of the floor.

It's doubtful anybody would do something like that, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
txaslftist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
5. Actually, I think they call them "dreams" not "ideas".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meegbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
6. The repugs would use this ...
as another "reason" to get rid of filibusters altogether.

Good idea, but not in this climate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
7. As much as I like the idea of her never achieving the confirmation
I like the idea that Sen. Boxer is putting her on record, under oath.

In terms of this administration,keep thinking....NIXON.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Weren't Democrats in charge of Congress under Nixon?
Point is, these Repugs won't ever take down Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K-W Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. If Bush becomes a political liability, they will string him up
Edited on Wed Jan-19-05 09:38 AM by K-W
They are loyal to him because right now Bush and his people control who gets elected to office. They control party access and the financial streams into and within the party. Republicans who dont play ball end up facing extremely well funded ultra conservatives in their next bid for realection.

If the nation turns on him electorally, or if the party fractures, he could very easily find himself in a position where itis in the best political interest of republicans to destroy him, and they would in a second.

There is also the fact that Republicans suck at governing, if they make a big enough mess even this delluded country might turn on them and elect a democratic congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K-W Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
10. It isnt even worth trying.
If they back Bush against a wall with the fillibuster, the Republicans will remove the option.

The democrats are right on this one. They may only get one shot to use the fillibuster to block a nominee, and it should be a judicial nominee, not a cabinet nominee. Condi deserves to be held accountable, but at the end of the day, the president is going to pick a cabinet that serves his purposes, and it will end in 4 years. Judges are much harder to oust.

They should do exactly what some of them are doing, hammer Condi with questions, make a big stink about her failures, but not waste procedural maneuvering on replacing condi with another Bush lackey who hasnt yet lied to the entire nation, but certainly will in due time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rachelbirds Donating Member (72 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
13. never happen
It's a done deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC