Here is the deal with 9/11 and Iraq

[Jester_11218]

Every time the "news" polls show that people believe that Iraq was involved in the attacks of 9/11 they are actually giving themselves a failing grade. The higher percent of the people polled who believe in somthing so inaccurate the lower the grade for accurate news reporting should be for the networks.

This is the root of the problem in this nation. There is no news network on TV.

We must start providing this information to the ignorant.

Perhaps we can all form a e-mail based word of mouth news network. "News of the people, by the people and for the people!"

CNN et al are too busy reporting stories that we used to have to buy the National Enquirer to read about. Now these stories are front page news.

Sad, so sad.

As the "Information highway gets larger" the "Information airways" get smaller.

Ignorant flag waving morons populate this nation. So sad that you can learn more about what goes on in this country by watching an international news broadcast than you do by wathcing our own pretent news networks!

Jesse - Editor - http://tvnewslies.org

[jmcgowanjm]

1. IMO-when TV lies then rebutting the Lie should be LBN

As in CNN last nite-
Paraphrase-"The temperature in the Towers
was 2000 degrees"

Rebuttal-Open air fires cannot burn that hot.
Steel cannot be melted by Openair fires.

And with less fuel to feed the fire,
the south tower collapsed only 47
minutes after the plane collision,
again with complete destruction. 
This is only half the time it took
to destroy the north tower. 
-Muslims Suspend Laws of Physics

[Jester_11218]

2. What about building 7

If you think that it is odd that the 2 main towers collapsed how can we possibly explain the perfect controlled demolition of building 7? No plan hit it and it was not doused in plane fuel.

[maha]

3. I'm going to start a new organization.

Working Title: Survivors and Eyewitnesses of the Destruction of the World Trade Center Who Wish the Clueless Conspiracy Theorists Would Shut Up.

SEDWTCWWCCTWSU is too long though. Needs work.

[Jester_11218]

4. What are you trying to say?

2 points:

1. My sister worked at the WTC (she survived). She told me that FBI were all over the building the on the 10th with bomb sniffing dogs.
2. Do not confuse consipracy threories with resonable suspision. Theory is based on conceptual ideas and science. Resaonable suspision is based on evidents and undisputed events.

What you describe as conspiracy theories for the most part are mostly logical questions that are being asked based on the undisputed evidence and facts. Nobody to this day has been able to explain the destruction of WTC 7, not even the investigators.

So as foar as the "shut the hell up" comment, that is what is wrong in this country. We have been told to shut up about the wrong things and we have been told to mouth off about the wron things.

Regarding Iraq, the entire world knew that they had nothing to do with it:
http://tvnewslies.org/html/al_quaeda_links.html

Regarding our government, the entire world warned them:
http://tvnewslies.org/html/9_11_warnings.html

Theories? I think not. Reasonalbe suspision, indeed yes!