Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What Jerry Falwell says about Martin Luther King

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
ck4829 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 07:52 AM
Original message
What Jerry Falwell says about Martin Luther King
Edited on Fri Jan-21-05 07:52 AM by ck4829
I know this is a couple of days late, for that I am sorry.

"I do question the sincerity and non-violent intentions of some civil rights leaders such as Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., Mr. James Farmer, and others, who are known to have left-wing associations."
http://home.att.net/~jrhsc/devil.html

Instead of joining King's fight for true moral values, Falwell questioned King, opposed him, and even accused him of being under the influence of Communists.
http://www.mountainpridemedia.org/oitm/issues/1987/01jan1987/king.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
6th Borough Donating Member (670 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 07:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. Jerry Falwell is a non-person who should get no more attention then...
Edited on Fri Jan-21-05 07:56 AM by 6th Borough
the Olsen twins.

Ignore him an his egregious sin of gluttony.

(edited for spelling)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
6th Borough Donating Member (670 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 07:57 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. an=and
err...more spelling editry.

Too...much...whisky
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostInAnomie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 07:57 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. LOL
I just spit water on my keyboard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boosterman Donating Member (515 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #1
13. I would disagree with you
The Olsen twins are far more worthy of attention than Falwell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #13
19. agreed
The Olsen twins are much prettier. Falwell is just the American version of Radical Cleric Al-Sadr.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostInAnomie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 07:56 AM
Response to Original message
2. Nothing like Fartwell's moral clarity against an oppressed group...
... of human beings.

The funny thing is that pure Communism looks a HELL of a lot more like Jesus's ideal than Capitalism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CottonBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 07:58 AM
Response to Original message
5. That's why King was killed: left-wing associations.
Note that the MSM and even most Democrats never speak of King's post March on Washington work. King espoused peace abroad and justice at home. At the time of his death, he was involved in the poor peoples campaign which supported civil and labor rights of the poor, women and minorities. That made him a threat in the eyes of the ruling class.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UL_Approved Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 08:05 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. The important truth
King helped all people to get civil rights. He helped garbage workers, he helped factory workers, he helped people all over the world. And this was one of the greatest achievements of the human race.

Falwell is an astronomical POS for decrying King's work. That speaks volumes to the "religious right". I wonder if more exposure of his racist rambling would destroy his support base?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wolfgirl Donating Member (950 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #5
15. MLK was killed
after he began to vigorously oppose the war in Vietnam...he was educating the people that we are just cannon fodder for the rich & powerful who want to rule the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
itzamirakul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. Dr. King was a threat to
not only the racist rightwing but also the racist leftwing. We need tounderstand that there are still many racists in our own Party. Just read any post that someone puts up about the Confederate flag or the Civil War and true "colors" rapidly appear.

Dr. King and Robert Kennedy had begun to unify "the people" - meaning people of all colors and ethncities into an awareness of class differences. That alone made the elites of both right and left wing fearful and so both of them had to go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wolfgirl Donating Member (950 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. It's not just racism...
it's about money. The powerful keep us focused on race (and I agree, it is a huge problem) and diverted from the real issue of $$. If we look at the real divide in this country, it's a divide centered on who controls the wealth. We are fast approaching what was France before their revolution.

They are using race issues (& sexual orientation & religion) to keep us fighting among ourselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
itzamirakul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #17
21. Perhaps I did not make myself clear...
but essentially I am saying the same thing that you are saying. Only I said the Dr, King and Robert Kennedy had unified the average citizens, those of lower middle class and poverty backgrounds, despite differences in race and ethnicity. It is always the unification of the masses based on sharing the wealth that causes the upper classes to panic and to seek ways to divide and conquer.

The most lethal way of divide and conquer is by playing the race card.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jamastiene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 08:02 AM
Response to Original message
6. I know I am not supposed to hate, but
I despise that sorry excuse for a human being with a passion so strong, I'd turn down sex just to watch him suffer. If anything, he is going against the Bible by being such a prick that he causes normally good kindhearted gentle people to have the same kind of murderous lust normally reserved only for serial killers, sadists, and terrorists. He is the devil. That's the secret to the whole thing. Falwell and his ilk are the ones who cause criminal thoughts to exist where none existed before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crankie Avalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
7. It's not just Falwell, the whole neocon establishment...
...despises King. Their "Saint", Reagan, didn't ever want to acknowledge King as a hero:

Holiday for a Hero

By Earl Ofari Hutchinson, AlterNet. Posted January 13, 2005.

Twenty-one years ago a fiercely reluctant President Reagan inked the law that made Martin Luther King Jr.'s birthday a national holiday. Reagan signed the bill only after a 15-year tumultuous battle in Congress to get the bill passed, and only then when it was clear that the bill would pass with or without his backing.

Reagan bought North Carolina Sen. Jesse Helms' loud and oft-shouted view that King was not just a noisy racial agitator, but had strong Communist leanings. Reagan barely finished signing the bill when he was asked whether he thought there was any merit to Helms' Communist charge against King. The Gipper couldn't resist the sly aside, "We'll know in about thirty-five years." Reagan referred to the voluminous FBI surveillance tapes on King that a court had ordered sealed until 2027. The year after Reagan signed the bill, Helms trailed badly in the polls in his re-election bid. He was thought to be a surefire loser. He won handily. The reason some media and political pundits gave for Helms stunning reversal: His filibuster against the King holiday bill.

Reagan's quip and Helms rabid opposition sent the not so subtle message that King really didn't merit a national holiday. Legions of state legislators, local officials, and business leaders instantly took the cue. It took more than a decade sparked by ferocious political, and legal battles and intense opposition from industry groups before all fifty states finally capitulated and passed a King holiday law.

That hasn't ended the fight...

More: http://www.alternet.org/columnists/story/20984/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
8. Dr. King was a great man. Falwell is a horrible one.
I never give any creedence to that RW nutcase.

-------------------------------------
Would Jesus love a liberal? You bet!
http://timeforachange.bluelemur.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 08:05 AM
Response to Original message
10. Falwell doesn't like to being held up to the Christian standards of
Dr. King as he fails in comparison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Azathoth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
11. The communist allegations have been used to smear King for years
Edited on Fri Jan-21-05 08:07 AM by Azathoth
All this proves is that Falwell is not only un-Christian, but also uncreative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hector459 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 08:10 AM
Response to Original message
12. Anyone who opposed the corporatocracy was labeled "communist"
by the US powers whenever they wanted to go after someone or marginalize the issues that honest, good, and sincere activists supported. Also, anyone who knew and understood what was going on around the world at the hands of our CIA and other government-sponsored clandestine operations and tried to get the message out to the people was considered to be either a communist or a communist-sympathizer. Now they are "terrorist apologizers" or Al-qaeda sympathizers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
14.  with a word king could have started a race war if he had wanted to
that we'd still be fighting. i'm glad he was a non-violent force. I am starting to wonder if his way will have any effect today though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taxloss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
18. What MLK has to say to Falwell:
'Don't let anybody make you think God chose America as his divine messianic force to be - a sort of policeman of the whole world. God has a way of standing before the nations with justice and it seems I can hear God saying to America "you are too arrogant, and if you don't change your ways, I will rise up and break the backbone of your power, and I will place it in the hands of a nation that doesn't even know my name. Be still and know that I'm God. Men will beat their swords into plowshafts and their spears into pruning hooks, and nations shall not rise up against nations, neither shall they study war anymore." I don't know about you, I ain't going to study war anymore.'

Falwell isn't fit to clean his shoes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
20. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC