Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Poll: Should UN and "Old Europe" Demand Saddam's Return to Power

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
cspiguy Donating Member (679 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-03 01:36 PM
Original message
Poll: Should UN and "Old Europe" Demand Saddam's Return to Power
As a condition of economic and military assistance? Obviously, if the U.S. had followed the lead of France, Germany, and Russia this spring, Saddam would still be comfortably in control as the leader of Iraq. He kept the country stable and would have been able to get the petroeconomy going to help his people if we had not interfered.

So it is not glib to ask - Should Saddam be returned to power. One might also ask if Slobodan Milosovich should be returned to power if he is vindicated by the trials in the Hague which are stalled in legal quagmires at present. Would a UN-blessed Baath party government put the genie back into the bottle and leave the middle east more stable while attention could be properly turned to the plight of the palestinians?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DarkPhenyx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-03 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. Absolutely not!
Not even in a bad year should they request that, adn if they do we should not allow it. Despite how he was removed from power, he was not an individual who should have been a leader of men. We are much better w/o him in power, but there were better ways to go about it. The problems we are having in Iraq now are not because Saddam is no longer in power. They exist because we fucked up the post war operations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ugarte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-03 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. Absurd
I've never heard anyone advocating this, although I think we should get the hell out of Iraq and let them have whomever they want.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cspiguy Donating Member (679 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-03 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. which would be Saddam - since everyone is still scared of him
and his party. If he were shown to be dead, the killings would trickle and stop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kellanved Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-03 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. That's assuming that Saddam loyalists are the only source of violence
Edited on Mon Sep-08-03 03:18 PM by Kellanved
If it's a hidden Civil War and/ or a power struggle for the Shiite Leadership-role Saddam's end would mean nothing.
And even declared enemies of Saddam aren't too fond of foreigners in their country - more soldiers wouldn't automatically mean more peace.

In any case: "Old Europe" is not demanding a pull-out, but elections and transfer of power ASAP; with ongoing reconstruction aid.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cspiguy Donating Member (679 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-03 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. "but elections and transfer of power ASAP"
Which would undoubtably return Baath elements to power, if held anytime soon before Saddam is captured.

If Saddam escapes the country and asks for UN protection - SHOULD HE NOT HAVE IT? He did not violate UN resolutions on WMD as is now clear - the UN would HAVE TO take him under protection as a government in exile until his restoration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kellanved Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-03 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. FYI: the Sunni(baathists) are a minority in Iraq
The Shiites would have more weight in elections, raising the possibility of a second Iran.

Saddam is beyond any doubt a war-criminal - asking the UN would mean a nice cell in the Hague.

This has been discussed here so often - in GD to be exact, that I hardly see any angle not already covered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-03 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. Not obvious - Intrusive inspection alternative to war would end Saddam
As he would in effect have given up control - and be seen as weak - and then killed.

This is just a GOP spin - that as usual forgets the history of how we got into this war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-03 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
4. Good grief
No! Who would want that murderous bastard back?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redeye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-03 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
5. No
At the time it seemed reasonable to keep him in place because of the bloodshed that would result from toppling him militarily. However, given that the bloodshed has happened, plus a lot of anti-Saddam feelings have surfaced thus resulting in another mass murder if Saddam returns, this shouldn't happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ps1074 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-03 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
6. you broke it - you buy it
UN and 'Old Europe' were warning about this whole mess. Bush never listened. I thought US didn't need this stinky UN... One has to watch his mouth and the US president should know better.

Now UN need to set a humiliating conditions to US like:

1.UN will provide half of the troops and they will not be under US command.
2.US and the coalition of the willing will provide the funds for Iraq reconstruction.
3.All oil contracts prior to the war should be respected.


How's that for a plan?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kamika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-03 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
7. just why should they?
That would be pretty weird to demand him back.

They should however demand more influence of the rebuilding
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissMillie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-03 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
8. Um.... NO!
Besides, I don't think they want him in power any more than we do.

It's not as though he were in power by virtue of fair and honest elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cspiguy Donating Member (679 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-03 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. but the countries involved worked HARD to keep him there.
Maybe it was an all out effort to stop Bush's plans over everything else, but to an outside observer it looked like the UN Kofi and company really wanted to protect Saddam's government's legitimacy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlashHarry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-03 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Hah!
There's a big difference between not condoning invading a country, however tyrannical, and actually condoning the government. (See Zimbabwe, Saudi Arabia, N. Korea, Myanmar, etc. for reference)

Typical manichaean RW bullsh*t. Black/White. Right/Wrong. Absolutely no middle-ground.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-03 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #10
20. Well that is certainly the rightwing view of the UN.
I believe those countries worked hard to uphold international law and the power of the UN to enforce it and the power of the UN to conduct inspections...now about those WMD's...any idea where they are?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlashHarry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-03 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
13. Why do I get the feeling this guy is a 'master baiter?'
Hmm...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Booberdawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-03 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
14. Good God that is absurd
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BonjourUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-03 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
17. "Old Europe" : old but not senile
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greenwow Donating Member (729 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-03 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
18. Considering the people were better-off before...
bringing back their elected president is looking like a better and better option.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-03 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. He Wasn't Elected In A "Fair" or "Democratic" Election
It was a Yes or No vote and 99.9% voted Yes...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greenwow Donating Member (729 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-03 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #19
27. But unlike Bush
he actually did win the election. He's a more legitimate ruler than our own emperor.

I'm still shocked to see all of the pro-Bush posts in this thread. This looks more like freeper-central than DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-03 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
21. No of course not
Restoring Saddam back to power?

No. Ludicrous question.

But very Fair and Balanced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fla nocount Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-03 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
22. Yes, Yes, Yes. WTF! I thought this was a poll and I got to vote.
Where's the the bar chart and the little vote rectangle? This is an issue that should have been put to sleep until the adults came to wake us up. The little demons that live under my bed and live to grab my legs and pull me under with them should I get up in the dark to go pee-pee are in charge. Please Saddam, turn back the clock and save us all. Pinch me and I'll wake up........Demon Whistle-ass and his evil uncles were just a dream.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-03 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
23. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-03 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
24. Thanks, ALex, I'll take "what Richard Perle would say" for 100
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chadm Donating Member (480 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-03 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
25. I would support returning Saddam to power
yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-03 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Might As Well Return Adolf Hitler Too
maybe we can channel him

-:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
friendofbenn Donating Member (383 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-03 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
28. haha
this "return saddam" brigade are obviously freepers. is it just me?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC