Charlie Brown
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-24-05 06:54 PM
Original message |
FR posters upset w/ High Court "dog sniffing" ruling. |
|
Edited on Mon Jan-24-05 06:56 PM by Charlie Brown
Could it be we've actually found some common ground w/Freeps? http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1327325/postsBTW, I can't believe Stevens, Breyer, and Kennedy sided w/the majority.
|
Sapphocrat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-24-05 06:58 PM
Response to Original message |
|
...if they're not guilty of anything, they have nothing to worry about.
After all, that's what they've been telling us since 9/11, isn't it?
|
devilgrrl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-24-05 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
You beat me too it.
Perhaps, this will wake them up.... FINALLY!!!!
|
fob
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-24-05 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
11. Then tell 'em you can't WAIT until Hillary get's her chance to use that |
|
law. The ensuing fireworks outta be visible from here.
|
The Backlash Cometh
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-24-05 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
Read the case opinion. Someone go and post on free republic and tell them to follow Scalia's opinions on police rights to search a car EVEN if it just began as a traffic stop.
|
Bluebear
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-24-05 06:58 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Lurking FR members: I stand with you on this |
|
Edited on Mon Jan-24-05 06:59 PM by Bluebear
We can find common ground on what America is. Now please re-examine everything else :)
|
Streetdoc270
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-24-05 06:59 PM
Response to Original message |
3. wow, I could actually read all of the posts |
|
with out leaving in disgust. Now I wonder what would happen if someone told them that they are responsible for their loss of freedoms by allowing Bush to stay in the White House?
|
ima_sinnic
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-24-05 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
13. precisely. the dumb@sses voted for BushCo, & now they're whining |
|
--are they that stupid, that they can't connect the Naked Ape and his repressive policies (in the name of "fighting terrorism," of course) with the gradual eroding of our rights?
DOH!!
sheesh.
|
karlrschneider
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-24-05 07:00 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Next up: cops can "inspect" your home without warrants. |
w4rma
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-24-05 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
18. The Patriot Act already allows that. |
|
Edited on Mon Jan-24-05 07:21 PM by w4rma
Although I don't believe it's been tested in court yet, since, according to the Patriot Act, they don't have to tell you if they've searched your home... *ever*, so no cases.
|
KarenS
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-24-05 07:01 PM
Response to Original message |
|
like the above poster I was shocked that I could actually read the whole thread,,,,
my favorite quote was "if you're happy & you know it, rattle your chains" ;-)
|
blm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-24-05 07:02 PM
Original message |
Yeah, well, this is just the beginning. Wait till the SC OKs Bush's mental |
|
Edited on Mon Jan-24-05 07:05 PM by blm
health screening plan. Let them enjoy BUSH'S version of gun control.
BTW, Freepers, you really trust that Bush believes in free speech or political dissent? You think he wants a free and healthy press?
|
ET Awful
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-24-05 07:02 PM
Response to Original message |
7. I guess they don't quite get the fact that the policies that they've |
|
endorsed and supported coming from Shrubco are exactly what laid the groundwork for such decisions.
They have been supporting just such measures in the guise of the Patriot Act, all of Ashcroft's policies, etc. for years, and now they want to complain?
|
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-24-05 07:03 PM
Response to Original message |
8. Freepers must be hiding a ton of drugs.......... |
|
...then again, you'd have to be on drugs to think as they do.
|
Rex
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-24-05 07:03 PM
Response to Original message |
9. Libertarians read that board - no not martians |
|
Poor dears. They still don't understand the 'global economy' ting. :)
|
Renew Deal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-24-05 07:04 PM
Response to Original message |
10. These idiots vote for these guys and then bitch when they do what comes |
|
natural. Get used to it freeptards. You voted for it.
|
Beaverhausen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-24-05 07:09 PM
Response to Original message |
12. I can't believe this is posted on FR!!! |
|
"You are free to submit... Is this what Bush means by ''freedom''?... hardly worth fighting for."
20 posted on 01/24/2005 9:33:57 AM PST by Lexington Green (Follow the money - Saddam to Rich to Clinton)
|
Q3JR4
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-24-05 07:10 PM
Response to Original message |
14. Ha! That's funny. n/t |
DrGonzoLives
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-24-05 07:11 PM
Response to Original message |
15. Kennedy I'm not so surprised about |
|
He pretty much does what Scalia and others tell him to do anymore.
Stevens and Breyer, though - that pisses me off. They should know better.
|
hollowdweller
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-24-05 07:14 PM
Response to Original message |
16. Civil Liberties is a great uniter of people. Shame neither party really |
shadowknows69
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-24-05 07:39 PM
Response to Original message |
19. possibly more drug users on the right than we'd think? |
|
I notice none of them cast the blame towards shrub and company. Probably find a way to blame it on Clinton.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 02:09 PM
Response to Original message |