Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ever wonder?: Evangelicals v.s. the Environment

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
AnnInLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 08:14 AM
Original message
Ever wonder?: Evangelicals v.s. the Environment

An article from last year explains the views of different evangelical groups toward the environment, and their plans for America. What an interesting, eye-opening read!

http://www.grist.org/news/maindish/2004/10/27/scherer-christian/index.html

one paragraph: (but read the whole article)


"Christian politics has as its primary intent the conquest of the land -- of men, families, institutions, bureaucracies, courts, and governments for the Kingdom of Christ," writes reconstructionist George Grant. Christian dominion will be achieved by ending the separation of church and state, replacing U.S. democracy with a theocracy ruled by Old Testament law, and cutting all government social programs, instead turning that work over to Christian churches. Reconstructionists also would abolish government regulatory agencies, such as the U.S. EPA, because they are a distraction from their goal of Christianizing America, and subsequently, the rest of the world. "World conquest. That's what Christ has commissioned us to accomplish," says Grant. "We must win the world with the power of the Gospel. And we must never settle for anything less." Only when that conquest is complete can the Lord return.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
henrik larssonisking Donating Member (211 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
1. though i agree
with some of what is written, i think a lot of people misunderstand what the spreading of christianity is about. We are led to spread the word through our deeds and by example, its not meant to be spread by the sword, though many times in history this is the strategy that was used.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lectrobyte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 08:40 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Misunderstand? Perhaps. I've only learned to watch what they do, and
not what they say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftHander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
2. Agents of Satan at work...
Only when the world is rotting and putrid can the lord satan return...

Might as well spin them around and point to their own religion to show then that they are indeed not really "Jesus" people....they have been fooled by the liar...THE DEVIL!...


(that is if you really believe in all that stuff anyway...which I don't)

Fun to make the fundies spin by calling them Agents of Satan...



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enough Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
4. Several years ago in the used-book bin at a thrift shop,
I found a book explaining in great detail how the teaching of "environmentalism" in schools is anti-Christian and must be stopped. The author seemed to equate the study of the environment with paganism or (gasp) "nature worship."

The book was also dead-set against any measures to limit population growth. The attitude seems to be that the earth BELONGS to the humans and the humans are supposed to use it up at will.


That Grist article is well worth the time to read the whole thing.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
5. what do you expect
from a belief system invented by a gang of hard scrabble desert patriarchs who fought the land daily for survival? For whom rendering every atom of benefit from the land was seen as necessary for the continuance of the tribe?

Seems like religions founded in more fertile climes are more Earth friendly. For that matter even Australian aboriginal peoples and First Nation peoples in America who lived in the desert live(d) with their habitat, didn't make it an enemy. Why is the Abrahamic tradition so screwed up regarding the environment?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC