Dufaeth
(764 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-25-05 11:49 PM
Original message |
|
Edited on Wed Jan-26-05 12:27 AM by Dufaeth
Maybe I'm crazy, but wait and see. This is not the same as Williams, as Gallagher was paid for specific project writings.( not that there is no ethical problem there, it's just not the same as specifically buying propaganda.)
Once we've latched onto this one, I bet a bunch of stories about Clinton era writers who did the same will come out, pre-emptivly ruining the the impact of the other Williams type crimes when they are revealed. They did it with the national guard story and others. :tinfoilhat: Man i've been here too long :)
|
AP
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-26-05 12:07 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Actually, this is the only thing for which Williams has been punished |
|
so far.
He lost his syndication deal because his publisher said they weren't aware he had been paid for the opinions he put into his columns and they felt it undermined his integrity.
|
Dufaeth
(764 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-26-05 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. Williams is not the one I'm worried about |
|
The ones who need to be punished are the people in the government responsible for it.
|
AP
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-26-05 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. I was only responding to the statement that the Gallagher thing |
|
Edited on Wed Jan-26-05 12:55 AM by AP
isn't the same as Williams. In fact, the part that is similar to Williams is the one thing that has had repercussion for Williams.
|
ynksnewyork2
(138 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-26-05 01:36 AM
Response to Original message |
4. These two are apples and oranges |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:21 AM
Response to Original message |