Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is this a woman?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Thtwudbeme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 10:43 AM
Original message
Is this a woman?
Edited on Thu Jan-27-05 10:44 AM by Thtwudbeme
(mods, please leave this in GD--I am really curious to see "regular people's" responses, and not just those interested in religion. Thank you-Stephanie)

Is that a woman on the right of Jesus? On edit; Jesus' right, not yours! Your left! Who's on first?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
1. I Think That Would be
the disciple that Jesus loved. Usually identified as John.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EstimatedProphet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
2. Certainly looks that way
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paineinthearse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
3. Mary Magdeline? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. probably.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jdj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-05 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #5
55. the shirt looks like it has embroiderly below the collar, whereas
the other collars ar plain.

Very interesting she or he is in purple, sacred color of the middle-eastern pre-christian goddess figures.

Hmmm.

If it's John, maybe he was gender ambigious. I'm sure if give the choice Christians would prefer it be a woman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aristus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
4. John , the Beloved Disciple.
Yeah, he always looked kinda girly. You'd think a "Son of Thunder" would be portrayed in a more masculine manner. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shrike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #4
34. Son of Thunder?
Never heard that term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aristus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #34
39. John and James, the sons of Zebedee, were often referred to
as "The Sons of Thunder" because of their hot-headed zeal for Jesus and His mission. They had an extraordinarily ambitious mother who kept pressing them to claim favors from Jesus, like the right to sit, one at his left hand and the other at his right when He came into His Kingdom. This tended to irritate the other Apostles for some reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shrike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-05 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #39
59. Learn something new everyday on DU
Never heard that in catechism. Well, James was the first disciple to die for the cause.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SheWhoMustBeObeyed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #4
37. John is typically portrayed beardless, and since Leo was gay...
...he enjoyed painting pretty, tender youths. So sayeth the art history I studied. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
6. So, you read it, too?
Yes, it is a woman--and note how much she looks like Jesus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thtwudbeme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. No, I didn't read The Book!
:)

I am a Religion major, studying the Gnostics right now.

The people who wrote my textbooks were responsible for the information used in The DaVinci Code.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
King Coal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-05 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #10
61. Have you heard of the Gospel of Thomas?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lazarus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
7. could be
any of them without beards could appear to be women, that's just the way he painted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eallen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
8. No, silly. It's a painting.
I've never understood how people get so worked up over conspiracy theories and crypto-history. Why is it so many cannot discard one mythology, except to replace it with another?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
henrik larssonisking Donating Member (211 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-05 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #8
48. yup its a painting
therefore its an artists interpretation, if it was a photo then we could read more into it, though with photoshop etc even that would be suspect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
9. undoubtedly
yes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
11. Clearly, arguing over the bill
"Hey, who ordered the lobster salad??"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stanwyck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #11
24. Father Garducci?
(sp?) Is that you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedSock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #11
38. or
"He didn't order a coke. Ha!!" </morty seinfeld>

(from "the pen" episode)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
12. An additional question...
I'm being totally serious now...

All you scholars of the good book out there.

Is there humor anywhere in the bible?

I know there's lots of begetting, begotting, and knowing.

There's tons of sarcasm... Especially against secular
authoritarian figures.

But, is there any genuine humor?

Is it as dry as day old toast?

No offense anyone, I'm curious.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thtwudbeme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. The OT is full of practical jokes
Go put a fig leaf on your genitals and tell me how you feel in about...oh, say 5 minutes.

(Get some cortisone cream first, please!)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #14
22. Whoooowheeee...
Yeah, I've noticed tendencies in the OT...

=)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gruenemann Donating Member (753 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #12
20. humor may not come across in translation
All I can recall is a play on words, "I will make you fishers of men." Whether that's humor or not, or what the original said, I can't say. If it's true that Shakespeare worked on King James' translation, I would certainly expect there to be humor.

There's a book title I recall--"The Humor of Christ" or some such. I think the author's name is Elton Trueblood. But I'm reaching back over thirty years for this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #20
29. Thanks Gruenemann!
I'll check it out. =)

Yes, alas, humor is often lost on the cutting room floor.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #20
40. I once heard a sermon in which the priest pointed out
that some of the conversations that Jesus had, if read in the proper tone, could be seen as witty, and probably were in the original Aramaic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-05 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #40
51. That's very likely true...
I imagine our modern lives are so different from those
of two thousand years ago. What was high humor to them is
as alien to us as an escalator would be to them. (Umm...
How do you get a camel on one of those things?)

Really, I can see where the story of David and Goliath
could be funny or amazing to an oppressed people.

I wonder sometimes why humor doesn't seem to be transported
through the ages like war or hate?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gtp1976 Donating Member (326 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-05 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #51
56. Lost in Translation or...
...possibly ended up on the cutting room floor throughout history. Think about it. If Jesus existed, there is no way he could have gotten people to follow him if he was an asshole. He was likely a very witty and charismatic man. Probably good looking as well. He was definitely convincing and a threat to those that were against him, hence the crucifixion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-05 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #56
58. Superb point gtb! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mirandaod Donating Member (437 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
13. Looks feminine.
Let me guess - you just read the DaVinci Code?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thtwudbeme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. Nope, and I already responded to that question
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
16. Yes. Absolutely.
BTW, where's Mel Brooks?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unpossibles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
17. yes
it is his wife and most beloved disciple the Magdalene. John, along with Paul, was a RW spin artist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Petrushka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
18. Without a head-covering? Nope! (eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
19. What you should do is compare...
Edited on Thu Jan-27-05 11:35 AM by Prag
This one, which is Da Vinci's, with some of the other "Last
Suppers" out there.

There are several and unfortunately, I don't have time to look them up
for you today.

But, in those others, the person next to J.C. is clearly a man. (Usually, equiped with a beard.) Also, they typically portray "The
Holy Grail" as an actual goblet on the center of the table.

Check it out... It's worth your time. ;)

(Edit: Changed Di to Da... Duh!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thtwudbeme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. Well, I've spent 3 years on it so far
and am putting in another four at the least....so, yeah...I think it is :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SmokingJacket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
23. Since everyone is wearing a dress and has long hair and delicate
features, there's no way to tell. Except for the bearded ones.

Anyway, why?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
25. Yes, I believe that it is
She actually looks much like the other women that Da Vinci painted, delicate, rounded chin, button nose, high cheek bones.

The official story is that this is John the Baptist, however I find that to be a bit of a stretch. Compare this John to Da Vinci's latter work, St. John the Baptist, and there are striking differences. In the latter piece, John is portrayed as having dark brown, almost black hair, while here the figure is coiffed with dirty blonde hair. In the latter work, John is portrayed with a much stronger chin and a larger nose, yet this figure has a more delicate, rounded chin and a button nose. All in all, the latter John, while depicted as beautiful man, he is most definetively a male. The figure in The Last Supper, while claiming to be male, is most certainly depicted as a female. There is even some suggestive shadowing where her right breast is painted.

I believe that Da Vinci was trying to get a message across with this painting. The question is what was that message? Was it an allussion to a holy bloodline, or just a very sophisticated joke poking fun at the Church. We may never know, but with the recent unearthing of one of Da Vinci's workshops, we might find more clues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jdots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
26. It is a painting
sometimes you get off and just start painting when you work for someone else.What has made this painting last is the perspectives that were being figured out at the time. crappy answer but it is a painting before photo ops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
27. The one 4th from the right is my aunt Mildred
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roxy66 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #27
28. LOL!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #27
30. About the religious paintings
Many of the religious paintings of the time were influenced by who was paying the artist.

The person commissioning the piece would often tell the artist who each figure should look like. For example, "Make Jesus look like me, and make Judas look like that bastard mayor from the next town over."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #30
32. And could ya put some horns on 'em? Thanks. ;) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-05 07:53 AM
Response to Reply #32
44. Interesting thing about the horns....
Edited on Fri Jan-28-05 07:54 AM by IanDB1
The story of Jews and horns:
Why do we often see Moses shown with horns on his head?
http://jewish.com/askarabbi/askarabbi/askr893.htm

Q: Why do some sculptures (or paintings) of Moses show horns on his head?

A: In Exodus 34, verse 29, Moses comes down from the mountain after getting the second set of tablets of the 10 Commandments. (The first set was broken when he saw the people worshipping the Golden Calf.) The text says that Moses didn't know that his face was radiant because Moses had spoken to God. In Hebrew, the word for "radiant" is karan. This is closely related to the Hebrew word for "horn" - keren. In Akkadian prayers, these words are also closely related. When the Hebrew Bible was translated into Latin, the translation was that Moses' face "was horned". It was this mistranslation that led artists, most notably Michaelangelo, to portray Moses as horned. These visual representations of Moses with horns, as well as the Latin translation, is where non-Jews got the idea that all Jews have horns.

See also:
http://www.ushmm.org/outreach/sgp0183m.htm

http://www.beingjewish.org/jewishemail/article042402.html


Copyright (c) 1997 by Rabbi Jo David. All Rights Reserved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-05 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #44
49. Yes, strangely enough...
I was aware of that fact.

I've also read where the "radiant" term is used to discribe...

Adam
Eve
Abel

These last two have a fascinating story related to their appearance
because not only are they described as "karan", but, also in
some places with "keren".

Cain (Sometimes attributed as Lucifer)
Lilith

There are also groups who believe Judas was God or an agent
sent by God to assure the drama of Christ played out in the
manner intended. (Darn free will, anyway ;) )

I don't speak Hebrew so I must rely on admittedly telephoned
translations.

Thanks for pointing that out. I'm always glad to read in depth.

Thanks also for the links... They were wonderful. =)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flygal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #27
43. HA!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cags Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
31. A few of them look like women
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #31
42. I thought so too, in spite of the beards.
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
33. No...
although you would have to ask Da Vinci to be sure. He missed a couple of other things, like the Grail, in that one, so who knows what was on his mind.

There are twelve people besides Jesus at that table, and Judas was there, so there's no Magdalene, or Mary, or anyone else besides the Apostles hanging out with him.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shugah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-05 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #33
62. actually, i saw a program about this recently
the premise was that the person in da vincis painting is actually mary magdelene and that she is the holy grail. she is the vessel that carried the blood of jesus, specifically she was pregnant by jesus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
35. Where's Rufus?
Edited on Thu Jan-27-05 11:21 AM by shadowknows69
Rufus: I was stoned to death

Beverly: You were martyred?

Rufus: That's one way to say it. Another way would be to say I was blugeoned to shit by big fuckin rocks.


Dogma: Learn it, love it, live it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radwriter0555 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
36. clearly a female.
No question.

Unless you're in a cult and only believe what some drunken guys wrote about 2000 years ago in order to prop up their paternal/fraternal female-ostracizing beliefs.

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
disillusioned1 Donating Member (280 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
41. In a local cemetary here.....
there's a 15' tall marble statue of John, along with Mark, Luke and Matthew. My mother in law is buried near them.

I thought John was a woman until I read the name plate at the base of the statue. His face is very feminine and I could swear those were breasts beneath his gown.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ironpost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-05 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
45. I see two, possibly three Lady's
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dorian Gray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-05 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
46. The way I see it...
I would guess that Da Vinci painted it as a woman. It is well enough known that he was a Gnostic, and he had some troubled feelings towards the RCC.

He may have believed that she was present at the Last Supper, or he may have done this as a "secret message" to get at the RCC.

What humors me, however, is that many people talk about this painting as though it's biblical proof of who was at The Last Supper. Actually, it's a representation painted by Da Vinci 1000+ years after the Last Supper. That's all.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Montanan Donating Member (78 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-05 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
47. That's the waitress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ArkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-05 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #47
54. Good one
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ArkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-05 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
50. It's rumored that Leonardo didn't have the actual participants
in the 'last supper' pose for the painting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-05 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #50
52. no way.
I thought they all came back for it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DistantWind88 Donating Member (695 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-05 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
53. If it were a picture, it might mean something
But since it's a painting, the person looks like whatever LDV wanted it to look like.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
King Coal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-05 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
57. It's a hint of some kind.
:smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
American Tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-05 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
60. Leonardo's preliminary sketches label the figure as St. John
who was depicted by both Leonardo and Michelangelo as looking rather feminine, since he was supposed to be young.

I suppose it could all be a grand conspiracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-05 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #60
63. Michelangelo was also suspected of being in the know... So to speak. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC