MSNBC Poll: * off da hook?

[JustJoe]

http://www.msnbc.com/news/778726.asp#survey

[lcordero]

1. 78%=No

Hehehehehehe

[Cocoa]

3. I can hardly believe this

I think we've reached the "everybody knows Bush lied" stage of public opinion.

Things are gonna get rough, people are now going to start noticing how much he's hiding, that is to say every freaking thing he does. They're going to start wondering where the hell Cheney has been.

[Dudley_DUright]

2. Now 80/20 (no/yes)

n/t

[nadinbrzezinski]

4. a thought crosed my mind

Rove is using the networks for insta polling... ok not "scientific" but he sure is not liking it... oh and I did send this little broadsise

Dubya ain't off the hook. Moreover our sons and daughers went to an agressive expansionnist war over these lies... warcrimes come to mind... article two of the Nuremberg code comes to mind, (Crimes Against Humanity) that is what Bush is responsible for.

[Jackpine Radical]

5. I voted & added this comment:

Bush is not off the hook because the available evidence indicates that he deliberately presented false evidence in order to get America into an otherwise unjustified war. That is not only lying, it is telling lies that kill people--unlike (to pick a random example) lying about a consensual sexual relationship.

[twilight]

6. *ding*

CIA takes the heat: Is Pres. Bush off the hook?
* 261 responses
Yes
20%

No
80%

:kick:

[stlsaxman]

7. 81 to 19 now and dropping (?) n/t

.

[DrBB]

82% no. I said this

Tenet's statement simply confirms the fact that, even after the CIA told the WH the niger story was bogus, the WH still wanted to put it in the speech. The WH is saying the CIA didn't stop them from deliberately lying, therefore it's the CIA's fault? Give me a break.

[1monster]

8. Voted

poll now stands at

CIA takes the heat: Is Pres. Bush off the hook?
* 325 responses
Yes 18%
No 82%

[lkinsale]

9. This makes me feel better n/t

[calimary]

10. It was 81 percent "NO" when I voted a moment ago.

But now I can't access the poll - link goes directly to past polls.

[linazelle]

11. I got the past polls too...I guess the liberal media didn't like results

of that poll. Sad.

[barbaraann]

12. Did you try scrolling up?

I had to do that--for some reason the link didn't go to the top.

[Nashyra]

17. Just voted poll at 85%-15%against *

Earlier I was trying to get to the poll without the help of DU and came across an interesting site http://whatthenationthinks.com it was a polling site worth checking out. It includes a section to ask your own poll question, what caught my eye was a poll asking if you would vote for Dean or * in 2004 and Dean was leading by 56% to 37% with approximately 5000 votes. Anyone ever been there and what do think?

[Buns_of_Fire]

31. Interesting site. A little bit of everything.

And I voted in the same poll you did. With 5597 votes, the results were standing at:
Bunnypants: 35%
Dean: 59%
Not Sure: 6%

There wasn't a choice to say that I'd vote for an overripe avocado over Bu$h, but you can't have everything...

[revcarol]

14. Scroll back up.

Cookies are on, so only FReepers will be voting twice. Now 84% he's NOT off the hook.

[RMJ]

13. woo hoo!

it is now 16% yes 84% no!

[Raenelle]

15. 84 to 16%.

n/t

[yankeeinlouisiana]

16. It's getting better!!

85% no 15% yes
413 total votes

Hahahahaha!!

[Mari333]

18. No, Bush is NOT off the hook. he's toast

get down tonight, get down tonight..

[Kellanved]

19. 14/86

WIth 513 resonses

[Il_Coniglietto]

20. Getting higher!

86% say 'No' now.

[diplomats]

22. It's 86 no, 14 yes now

pretty one-sided!

[Marymarg]

21. just voted

No 87% :)

[TruthIsAll]

23. Track the votes..accept the first 1500 ...ignore the rest (freeped)

CIA takes the heat: Is Pres. Bush off the hook?
* 595 responses
Yes 13% No 87%
Survey results tallied every 60 seconds. Live Votes reflect respondents' views and are not scientifically valid surveys.

[DancingBear]

24. Just voted

87/13 for NO.

[ParanoidPat]

25. Still at 86% NO, I left the following comment...

...."It's sad that you would even ask this question. If the press was doing it's job, you would be pointing out the number of times this info was publicly called into question before the war and your question would read, "Should George Bush be tried for treason after the impeachment!"
Please, Don't ever ask why your ratings are forever dropping!" :evilgrin:

[OffWithTheirHeads]

26. I put my 2 cents in

Said, if the asshole lied about this, what else has he lied about?

[caledesi]

27. NO! 87% 1:58 PM EDT

[stlsaxman]

28. 87% No ... hey and there's this from July 9th-

Iraq uranium flap: Much ado about nothing?
* 8970 responses
Yes
 39%
No
 61%

i like the "this is harmles enough, nothing here- move on" feel with the
choice of "flap"... these whores are good!

[LibertyorDeath]

29. Pinch me I must be dreaming !

CIA takes the heat: Is Pres. Bush off the hook?
* 656 responses
87% No
13% Yes

[Iris]

30. now it's 87 "no" and 13 "yes"

But what I really hate about these polls is stuff like this:

"Do you think Kobe Bryant did it?"

I mean, he either did or he didn't. It really doesn't matter what anyone's OPINION about it is.

[Bandit]

32. Still 87% say no but only 900 votes cast so not very impressive yet.

:shrug: At least a thousand of us don't think he should get away scott free

[rbnyc]

33. 88/12! (nt)

[Mz Pip]

34. My comment to MSNBC

If the Bush Adminstration was told back in October that the Saddam/Africa/uranium info was faulty how can Bush possibly be off the hook? Doesn't Bush attend briefings? Deos he pay attention in these briefings? Or does he just ignore the information and say whateer he want to advance his agenda.

MzPip
:dem:

[TruthIsAll]

35. Bush is ON the hook now..

..Let's reel him in..

[Zo Zig]

36. 88/12 1010 votes @ 3:00PM EST

[]