Must_B_Free
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-11-03 05:49 PM
Original message |
WHO does PNAC want to see winning Democratic Nomination? |
|
Or do they just have no opinion?
Can we count on them not to meddle in this affair or are they (have they) infiltrated the process to influence the outcome?
|
Sequoia
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-11-03 05:53 PM
Response to Original message |
|
or another loser who can't make contact with people.
|
mix68
(137 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-11-03 05:56 PM
Response to Original message |
Enraged American
(276 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-11-03 05:57 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Lieberman is Bush-lite. People will want the more authentic version of American fascism (eg. Shrub).
|
David Zephyr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-11-03 05:59 PM
Response to Original message |
Pepperbelly
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-11-03 06:04 PM
Response to Original message |
5. They want whoever Bush can beat ... |
WilliamPitt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-11-03 06:06 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Yaay! Baseless speculation! |
|
How on earth would anyone have an objective, informed answer to this question on this site? Short answer: They won't, because PNAC has only endorsed one guy: Bush. All this is is yet another opportunity for DUers to kick each other in the balls.
Giggling like a disgusted titmouse.
|
disgruntella
(983 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-11-03 06:07 PM
Response to Original message |
7. could it be.... this man? |
WilliamPitt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-11-03 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
8. Who makes Steve Gutenberg a star? |
DuctapeFatwa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-11-03 06:09 PM
Response to Original message |
9. If they decide to put a Democratic face on the policies |
|
They'll go with whoever can be counted on to do as they're told.
|
notadmblnd
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-11-03 06:12 PM
Response to Original message |
10. I was just thinking that about Clark |
|
From what I've heard, he is not a insider, but on the other hand he has been involved with the gvmt for 34 yrs. Could he be the plant? :tinfoilhat:
But seriously, I think until until Clark declares his candidicy, the gop is behind Lieberman. The media seems to be the least harsh on him.
I'm anxious to see how the media treats Clark once he decides.
|
DoveTurnedHawk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-11-03 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
11. I'm Glad You Acknowledge the "Tinfoil Hat" Nature of This "Theory" |
|
Thank heaven for small favors.
:eyes:
DTH
|
Pastiche423
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-11-03 06:16 PM
Response to Original message |
protect freedom impeach bush now
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-11-03 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
15. not sure, i did for an instant though....... |
|
but one would have to hold that Clinton is part of the PNACers.
I havent gone down that path (yet?)'
It a much too too dark a path.
|
Darranar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-11-03 06:18 PM
Response to Original message |
|
No question there.
I will have no comment on Clark, since I see no need to hijack this thread and start a flaming debate.
|
protect freedom impeach bush now
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-11-03 06:19 PM
Response to Original message |
14. likely the ENRON coverup guy - Lieberman |
|
too many rt-wingers are talking for old Joe.
|
oasis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-11-03 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
17. Enron cover up....no. Joe just gave'm a pass. He could have excused |
|
himself as chairman of the senate committee that investigated Enron since they kicked in a few thousand to his campaign, but Joe seen his duty and he dood it. Key Lay is laying on a beach somewhere knocking down a couple of Coronas without a care in the world.
Thanks Joe.
|
Sterling
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-11-03 06:21 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Who knows who works for PNAC anymore.
|
aquart
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-11-03 09:44 PM
Response to Original message |
|
They haven't got anything right yet.
|
JI7
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-11-03 09:47 PM
Response to Original message |
Pastiche423
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-11-03 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #19 |
Nikia
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-11-03 09:58 PM
Response to Original message |
21. Depends on their approach |
|
They might want a more conservative, centralist candidatewho would be an acceptable alternative to Bush. Their other approach would be for a more liberal candidate to win the nomination but who would be unable to win the presidential election. I think that they are waiting to see what approach they need to take closer to primary season.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:53 PM
Response to Original message |