Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CIA largest budget items: election tampering & news propaganda

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
protect freedom impeach bush now Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 09:03 PM
Original message
CIA largest budget items: election tampering & news propaganda
CIA largest budget items: election tampering & news propaganda.

Now the Bush PNAC cabal wouldnt be in control by BushSR the CIA man,
now would it ? <sarcasm>

Now the US news media wouldnt be controlled by CIA money,
now ould it ? <sarcasm>


--------------------------------------------



http://jeremybigwood.net/AJR/Intro2PikePapers.htm#The

From the text:
Introduction to the Pike Papers
by AARON LATHAM
the village VOICE
February 11, 1976

It may surprise some to discover that the largest single category of covert activity concerned tampering with free elections around the world. These election operations make up a full 32 percent of the covert action projects approved by the Forty Committee since 1965. The report says the operations usually mean "providing some form of financial election support to foreign parties and individuals. Such support could be negative as well as positive." Most of the money has gone to developing countries and generally "to incumbent moderate party leaders and heads of state." One "Third World leader" received $960,000 over a l4-year period.

The second largest covert action category is "media and propaganda." The committee found that 29 percent of the covert projects approved by the Forty Committee fell under this heading. The report says: "Activities have included support of friendly media, major propaganda efforts, insertion of articles into he local press, and distribution of books and leaflets. By far the largest single recipient has been a European publishing house funded since 1951... About 25 percent of the program has been directed at the Soviet Bloc, in the publication and clandestine import and export of Western and Soviet dissident literature."

The third largest category is "Paramilitary/Arms Transfers." These make up 23 percent of the total Forty Committee-approved. covert action, projects. Although these rank third in total numbers they rank first in expense. The committee report states: "By far the most interesting, and important fact to emerge was the recognition that the great majority of these covert action projects were proposed by parties outside CIA. Many of these programs were summarily ordered, over CIA objections. CIA misgivings, however, were at times weakly expressed, as the CIA is afflicted with a 'can do' attitude."

........more.............
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. "Somebody stop me!"
<"By far the most interesting, and important fact to emerge was the recognition that the great majority of these covert action projects were proposed by parties outside CIA. Many of these programs were summarily ordered, over CIA objections. CIA misgivings, however, were at times weakly expressed, as the CIA is afflicted with a 'can do' attitude.">

Arms proliferation. America's number one.

The devil made me do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. Venezuela, France, Germany, the UK, Mexico, Zimbabwe.
I'm sure they've spent tax money there and many othe places too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. Remember the Criticism of the NYT for uncredited Stringers This Summer?
CIA acknowledges that "stringers," and others with whom the Agency has a relationship are often directed to insert Agency-composed "news" articles into foreign publications and wire services. U.S. intelligence officials do not rule out the possibility that these planted stories may find their way into American newspapers from time to time, but insist that CIA does not intentionally propagandize in this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wwagsthedog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. How about a credited source?
Specifically, Judith Miller. She was probably the most outrageous organizer of news items as an "embedded" reporter in the Persian Gulf. Miller was a vigorous promoter of Ahmed Chalabi plus other pro-administratiion activities on behalf of the NYT. Two paychecks must be nice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I need to keep pointing out that Miller was one of the last people
David Kelly contacted before he died. He called her a friend.

People think Blair and Bush are buddies. I think Bush is trying to take down Blair, and Blair is standing tall for the anti-fascists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-03 06:58 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Can you elaborate?
I also think it is significant that Kelly contacted Blair when he was warned during his MND interrogation not to talk to the press. It was a violation of ministry policy to talk to the press without approval. Yet he did it again and was dead soon afterward. I the Kelly fiasco put an end to the WMD bullshit. While his death was a lose lose situation for Blair, on balance it helped the neocons and Blair because it silenced an authoritative source contradicting the two colonialists.

As to taking down Blair, Blair is a Rhodesian like the Neocon regime here. He believes in military adventurism and empire. They really see eye to eye on this. Of course he does come from the other side of the aisle. I don't know that the conservatives could pull this off. It reminds of the Disraeli-Gladstone orientation in Britain over a hundred years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
6. BFEE Buys a Lot of Air Time
Carl Bernstein wrote about the state interference in the press in a seminal article in The Village Voice in the late 1970s. The CIA, according to government sources Bernstein got on the record, has embedded agents as journalists. Anybody who’s anybody. For years.

Regarding elections: October Surprise in 1980 involved Don Gregg and Robert Gates, spooks friendly to Poppy who remianed inside the Carter administration and later surfaced as "helpers" with Iran.

In 2000: A "former" CIA officer happened also to be a GOP campaign official in Florida who helped Repugs receive absentee ballots, while ignoring Demos who requested ballots. The guy even admitted to being left alone with the Florida election record computers for a while. He testified in Judge Lewis(?)'s courtroom.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dusty64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-03 07:38 AM
Response to Original message
8. Why am I not surprised.
No doubt this is happening here, what are the links between the CIA and the "election" machine companies. I remember seeing some.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC