Goldmund
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-07-05 03:23 PM
Original message |
JEFFGANNON.ORG: asking for submissions and comments |
|
DutchDemocrat and I have been working hard to get jeffgannon.org up and running. DutchDemocrat did basically 95% of the CMS design, since I was kinda clueless about all these nifty website tools until a week ago (we're using Mambo), and we both worked on the initial content. I thank DutchDemocrat for teaching me what web slickness really means!
We decided to use Gannon as a symbol of the Bush propaganda, rather than have a Gannon-centric site. Here's the site's "mission statement":
Jeffgannon.org is a website dedicated to analysis, deconstruction and critique of political manipulation of public opinion under the Bush regime.
Policy and propaganda are often inseparable subjects for discussion. Nevertheless, we focus on the Administration's and the complicit media's presentation of the effects of and the motives behind the current American policies. In a wider context, we are interested in framing of the public debate, socio-psychological manipulation and abuse of value systems. Our reason for that focus is simple: the continued political success of the GOP and the Bush Administration is clearly not rooted in successful policy-making; instead, it is due to a masterful, creative and unscrupulous molding of public opinion. In principle, whenever political success grossly outpaces the level of success of implemented policies, it is fueled by propaganda.
The gap between the political success of a government and the failure of its policies, created by that propaganda, is universally filled with social conflict and economic decay.
Any comments you have are more than welcome. Join in the discussion.
Also, we are taking submissions. Articles, photoshops, cartoons, podcasts -- anything creative and related to Bush propaganda. Send submissions to admin-at-jeffgannon.org. Also, if you're interested in becoming a regular contributor, please let us know! This is your chance to publish on a website that we'll work hard to make highly visible.
www.jeffgannon.org
|
Name removed
(0 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-07-05 03:24 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
|
Fridays Child
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-07-05 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. Nope. Otherwise, gwbush.com would have been gone, long ago. |
|
Edited on Mon Mar-07-05 03:29 PM by Fridays Child
edited to add: Besides, Jeff Gannon, of intrepid conservative reporting fame, doesn't really exist.
|
BigBearJohn
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-07-05 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
6. when's the last time you visited gwbush.com.. check it out |
Fridays Child
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-07-05 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
27. But did B*shco shut it down? |
BigBearJohn
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-07-05 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #27 |
35. From what I hear, yes. |
Goldmund
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-08-05 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #35 |
44. Where did you hear that? Have a link? |
Goldmund
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-07-05 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
1) Jeff Gannon isn't his real name. 2) I emailed him and told him about the website, and all he had to say was "best of luck to you". 3) We're not profiting off the website. 4) Look at whitehouse.org or drudge.com. 5) We're publishing original content, not stealing his.
|
Desertrose
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-07-05 03:27 PM
Response to Original message |
3. text color is too pale |
|
Site looks great but even if I highlight it I still can't read it... maybe darken it or give it a dark background...
make the grey a darker grey and the turq deeper :)
Great work!! Look forward to reading more....
|
Goldmund
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-07-05 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
You're the second person who has complained about this. What browser/system are you using? Does it happen to be IE on a Mac?
|
Desertrose
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-07-05 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
|
have a Mac & am running IE.....
|
Goldmund
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-07-05 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
15. Thanks, we'll try fixing it |
Desertrose
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-07-05 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
BigBearJohn
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-07-05 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
9. I'm using Mozilla. I can read it, but it's a bit of a strain for me. |
|
Edited on Mon Mar-07-05 03:33 PM by BigBearJohn
Still, I love the layout I particularly like the buttons being on the right side instead of left. Beautiful job!
|
Goldmund
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-07-05 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
|
Is the DU breaking news scroller working fine on your Firefox?
|
BigBearJohn
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-07-05 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #31 |
34. Yes indeed, it works great! NICE touch. LOVE it!!!! |
dutchdemocrat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-07-05 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
37. Readability has improved |
|
Goldmund and I have taken steps to improve readability by upping the font size and breaking up the articles in more visually palatable paragraphs.
I think you will find it easier to read now!
Cheers
DD.
|
maxrandb
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-07-05 03:30 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Did You Say "Submissions", or "Submissives" n/t |
aden_nak
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-07-05 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
10. Damn you, beating me to it. |
Goldmund
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-07-05 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
|
Edited on Mon Mar-07-05 03:36 PM by Goldmund
read the post top to bottom, and you'll know. :evilgrin:
|
Hugin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-07-05 03:35 PM
Response to Original message |
Walt Starr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-07-05 03:36 PM
Response to Original message |
13. The beauty of jeffgannon.org is |
|
Guckert COULD HAVE trademarked "Jeff Gannon", but now it's too late!
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!
Jeff Gannon will forever be associated with paid propaganda!
|
Goldmund
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-07-05 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
SeveneightyWhoa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-08-05 12:41 AM
Response to Reply #14 |
|
Edited on Tue Mar-08-05 12:42 AM by SeveneightyWhoa
..and we have .org.
Fair enough.
|
uppityperson
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-07-05 03:43 PM
Response to Original message |
16. I liked the picture you had up first before you got it going |
|
Could you or do you have a link to it? I realize that you are not doing a parody website (too easy) but I did like the pict. Aha, I found the gallery, will look there.
|
Goldmund
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-07-05 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
|
it's not there now because we didn't make it -- billmon did, from billmon.org:
|
trumad
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-07-05 03:57 PM
Response to Original message |
19. Black backgrounds on web sites |
|
are for bleak, serious types of work. Me's thinks you should have fun with this site. MHOP Lighten it up a bit...
|
Goldmund
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-07-05 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #19 |
21. But it isn't black -- |
|
-- does it look black on your browser?
|
nostamj
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-07-05 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #21 |
22. looks black on mine... |
Goldmund
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-07-05 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #22 |
|
It's actually shaded blue-ish. I'll talk to DD tonight and see what we can do about that.
Thanks much for letting us know.
|
nostamj
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-07-05 03:58 PM
Response to Original message |
20. you're welcome to use my Gannon parody... |
|
(I sent a copy to the admin email addy)
I'M FOR SALE or, "The Ballad of Jeff Gannon" (to the tune of "Love For Sale" with profound apologies to Cole Porter)
FOR A WHITE HOUSE PASS ON MY BULLDOG NECK I'LL IGNORE THE FACTS, LET THEM GO UNCHECKED IT'S A BIZ I'VE BEEN IN BEFORE... I'VE SOLD MY ASS
TRUE MY MAN DATE WORK WAS TOUGH ON THE KNEES SO I ASKED: CAN I BE A JOURNALIST PLEASE? WHEN MY JOHN GAVE ME HIS SMIRK... I WENT TO WORK...
SPIN FOR SALE RHAPSODIZING BUSH SPIN FOR SALE SPIN THAT SELLS YOUR LATEST LIES SPIN STRAIGHT FROM MY MANLY THIGHS I'M FOR SALE
BUY MY PRIDE IF YOU SEEK DISTRACTION, I'M YOUR GUIDE ON THE FLOOR AND START TO BARK JUST IMPRESSIONS, NOT A MARK I'M FOR SALE
LET THE LIBRULS FLING THEIR POOP IN THEIR LOSER WAYS IT WON'T GET THEM IN THE LOOP LIKE MY BOYTOY DAYS
IF YOU PAY YOUR WHORE ENOUGH THEY'LL DELIVER FLUFF OR ROUGH ONLINE, ON CUE EVERY WORD IS UNTRUE
I'M FOR SALE MILITARY TOUGH STUFF FOR SALE AND WHEN SCOTTY CALLED MY NAME WE'D JUST WINK AND PLAY THE GAME I'M FOR SALE I'M FOR SALE I'M FOR SALE.....
|
radfringe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-07-05 04:03 PM
Response to Original message |
23. e-mail won't go through... |
|
The following problems occurred while processing your request:
admin-at-jeffgannon.org - This address is too long. Addresses are a maximum of 16 characters.
Your mail has not been sent. Please correct the problems listed and try again.
would love to send you some of my toons...
|
nostamj
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-07-05 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #23 |
24. uh, did you replace "-at-" with @ ? |
|
my mail went though to admin@jeffgannon.org with no problem...
|
Goldmund
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-07-05 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #24 |
28. Got your email, thanks! |
|
We'll be updating the site tonite.
|
Goldmund
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-07-05 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #23 |
earth mom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-07-05 04:08 PM
Response to Original message |
25. Can't read it-the colors are too light! eom |
Goldmund
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-07-05 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #25 |
29. What's the browser/system you're using? |
|
Thanks for letting us know.
|
roguevalley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-07-05 04:40 PM
Response to Original message |
32. check out americablog.org. they broke this thing. |
Goldmund
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-07-05 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #32 |
|
-- they, dailykos and mediamatters.
We're feeding them, if you look at the bottom of the main page.
|
Vinca
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-07-05 05:45 PM
Response to Original message |
36. Submissions or emissions? Just wondering. LOL |
Doctor_J
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-07-05 09:33 PM
Response to Original message |
38. I have one suggestion |
|
I would never refer to Guckert as anything but The White House Hooker. Never. Our few guys on TV and radio should be doing that every day.
|
Goldmund
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-08-05 12:00 AM
Response to Reply #38 |
39. We don't refer to him much on the site, for now. |
SeveneightyWhoa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-08-05 12:43 AM
Response to Original message |
41. Looks great, BUT I'm just wondering.. |
|
Edited on Tue Mar-08-05 12:43 AM by SeveneightyWhoa
..why you have a feed from the "Oh, That Liberal Media" blog, which is undoubtedly right-wing.
Also, I just put up a little "interview" w/ Gannon-Guckert at my site, if you're at all interested: www.counterbias.com/s04.html
|
dutchdemocrat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-08-05 01:36 AM
Response to Reply #41 |
42. Thanks for that catch |
|
I don't know how that liberal media feed slipped by me. I have been testing feeds as we had some issues with deformed characters and...
oops.
Thanks for the interview link!
We are hoping to get Jeff on a podcast this week and have requested an interview as well.
Cheers.
DD
|
raggedcompany
(399 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-08-05 08:36 AM
Response to Original message |
43. Sweet. I'll add it to my rounds. n/t |
bettyellen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-09-05 07:53 PM
Response to Original message |
45. Qusetion for the WH: Where does Condi buy her boots? |
|
from today's village voice.
|
EFerrari
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-09-05 07:56 PM
Response to Original message |
46. Hey, this is a great idea and your focus is right on. |
|
Edited on Wed Mar-09-05 08:21 PM by sfexpat2000
If the Wrinkle threads can provide info or exemplars, lemme know.
I was thinking about a short disquisition about the many writers of the Gannon canon. Again, not to be jeffcentric, but as a figure of what is going on in the media.
/typo
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon May 06th 2024, 12:25 AM
Response to Original message |