CatWoman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-15-05 06:54 PM
Original message |
Would the world be better off without Republicans? |
|
Don't give me that "Lincoln was a republican, and he freed the slaves" crap.
Today's Republican party is NOTHING like that of Lincoln's time.
|
movonne
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-15-05 06:55 PM
Response to Original message |
radwriter0555
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-15-05 06:57 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Todays republicans are the New Americanazis. They are evil, they are just |
|
like the minions who served hitler.
It will take NATO in the streets of Washington DC to remove them from power. Protect yourselves and your family.
|
Dave Reynolds
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-15-05 06:57 PM
Response to Original message |
|
but there would be some other group to fill the assholery void.
|
matcom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-15-05 06:58 PM
Response to Original message |
4. but where would i wipe off my "man-spunk"? |
benburch
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-15-05 06:58 PM
Response to Original message |
5. They make such good compost! |
|
You should SEE my garden!
|
Stop_the_War
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-15-05 06:58 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Tue Mar-15-05 06:59 PM by Stop_the_War
|
Selteri
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-15-05 06:59 PM
Response to Original message |
7. todays republicans stopped being republicans in the 50s. |
|
See McCarhy for details. ;)
|
TomClash
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-15-05 06:59 PM
Response to Original message |
8. This is a question you really don't have to ask |
|
The only Lincoln Republican is Lincoln Chaffee.
|
nothingshocksmeanymore
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-15-05 07:00 PM
Response to Original message |
9. why do you hate Lincoln? |
|
if it weren't for him you'd be tap dancing between choruses of "nobody knows the trouble I seen"
(SARCASM...I PROMISE!!!!)
|
CatWoman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-15-05 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
10. that's it!!!!!! take this!!!!! |
xchrom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-15-05 07:04 PM
Response to Original message |
11. yes -- but what would you replace them with? |
|
the religous nut job ass hat party?
|
Robbien
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-15-05 07:06 PM
Response to Original message |
12. I want the old Republican Party back. The cabal which took over |
|
the party today are greedy thugs.
Republicans should fight to get their party back.
|
BigBearJohn
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-15-05 07:11 PM
Response to Original message |
13. Well, there must be SOME use for stupid people. Nevermind. |
|
Edited on Tue Mar-15-05 07:11 PM by BigBearJohn
even cockroaches have their use. I think.
|
DemGirl7
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-15-05 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
|
there is always some use for stupid idiots...I mean who will we laugh at if these people didn't exist? I know I may extremely dislike alot of them, but I know deep down inside I would miss them...Heck I couldn't stand some who have passed on and went to hell within the last couple of years...yet for some freaky reason I miss them,I miss making the wise cracks and such...good times..
|
Inland
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-15-05 07:24 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Imagine all the nice suits and jewelry left empty in repug lobbying houses.
|
seabeyond
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-15-05 07:25 PM
Response to Original message |
15. cant have a ying without a yang |
|
if it were dems in control we would have their extreme. dont throw the baby out with the bathwater
|
supernova
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-15-05 07:27 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Tue Mar-15-05 07:36 PM by supernova
We would be better off. No more corporate welfare; no more nanny statism by telling people where, what kind and with whom to have sex; no more bluring the line between church and state with people who want to cotaminate and dominate both.
Sounds really good to me! :D
|
KoKo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-15-05 07:32 PM
Response to Original message |
17. Yes....we need a break from them...like maybe 25 years? |
|
I'm tired of them. At this point we have enough "DINO's" in the Dem Party to replace the Repugs....so let's send them out into the "Wilderness." I'm okay with that. :shrug:
Thanks for asking, though. :D
|
Warpy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-15-05 07:38 PM
Response to Original message |
19. We'd be far worse off without Repuglicans of Teddy Roosevelt's era |
|
During that time, all the hidebound, cigar chomping old farts trying to push the country toward feudalism were Democrats.
I think the proper question would be whether or not this country would be better off without the super rich, and the answer is an emphatic and unqualified YES.
Oh, we wouldn't be able to go on tour at Newport and laugh at the way they dismantled rooms in European castles and reassembled them here in an attempt to impress the former owners and Gates wouldn't have a mansion so huge I'm sure he hasn't visited all the rooms yet, but we'd have a large and stable middle class and a population that had health insurance, guaranteed pensions, child care, and all the other things our brethren all over the world take for granted.
It's the super rich and all the people they manage to scare and propagandize into voting against their own economic self interest who are the problem, not one party or the other. Both parties have been hijacked by rich scum in our history.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed May 08th 2024, 10:10 AM
Response to Original message |