Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

On Military Service

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Northwind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-03 06:36 PM
Original message
On Military Service
NOBODY FREAKIN' CARES.

Seriously, the Repubs tried to label Clinton as a draft-dodger. Didn't work, not because there is not any truth to it, but because no one cares about Vietnam service any more. The Dems tried to paint Quayle in the same light. Pointless effort, because no one gave a crap. Gore was a Vietnam volunteer, whereas Bush was a draft dodger. It did not matter.

A candidates military service or lack thereof is a non-issue. I do not care if Dean got deferment, I do not care if Kerry has medals, and Clark's generalship is irrelevant. Generally, I would like to see America move away from seeing military service as some sort of requisite for public service, so for me, the current non-relevance of it in politics is a Good Thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-03 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. You make a good point
but consider this - our country is now involved in a war, leading us down the path of imperialism using military might. What would you rather have? A leader like our current POTUS, who gets giddy thinking about blowing things up without any realistic knowledge of the horrors of war and doesn't care, or a leader who's been there and knows what it's all about? I'd rather have someone experienced. Especially someone experienced with a brain who understands the dangers of continuing to lead this country in the wrong direction.
I see military experience as a plus given what we're facing.

Maybe if those in charge in the White House had actually served, they would have been less inclined to start a preemptive war for no goddamn reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Northwind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-03 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. It really does not matter
Edited on Fri Sep-12-03 06:54 PM by Northwind
It is a non-issue in both directions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnKleeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-03 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. my candiate wasnt in the military but it does matter
It helped Eisenhower out a lot. Now maybe it doesnt help everyone at every point in history but Eisenhower being known as a popular general helped him out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-03 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
4. I disagree
You might not care but a lot of people do. People who have served in the military care more than most I suspect. I think this is because veterans understand that military service does involve a lot of sacrifice. Veterans also understand the unique learning that occurs during military service.
If you had any understanding of what it requires to become a general in the military, you would not make the silly statement that "Clark's generalship is irrelevant."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-03 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
5. Sevice or not can be less relevant.
But when serving, the character of that service, your conduct and efficiency, should be an issue, as in aWol's year over the hill. Media non-coverage of such should be an issue since that's why we have that part in the First Amendment about a 'free press'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-03 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Exactly. Bush would never have gotten close enough to steal
the election if his actual nonservice was revealed to the electorate.

Your conduct of service CAN make or break your campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-03 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. More so since 911 and the few "wars" we are perceived to be in now...
Edited on Fri Sep-12-03 08:53 PM by NNN0LHI
...by so much of the ignorant portion of the electorate. How many times have we heard about Junior being a wartime president? Plenty of times. That is the only thing that Chimpy and his minions have going for them right now. Times have changed. And the sooner we all realize this the better off we will all be. War service means nothing at all to me. But I am not the only one voting next year.

Don

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mountainman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-03 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
7. For me the relevance has to do with the time and place you were in
Edited on Fri Sep-12-03 07:17 PM by Mountainman
I am Bush's age. I was drafted. He had help avoiding the draft. That makes his non-service relevant to me. Kerry was a combat soldier. It has to have some effect on his make up to day. That makes his service relevant to me.

It could be that a future candidate's military service is non relevant but not this bunch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wickerman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-03 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
8. Come on out to small town America
Remember, those folks who voted for Bush in droves? Military service and how it is presented matters a whole freakin' bunch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
poskonig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-03 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
9. You're right.
Edited on Fri Sep-12-03 08:24 PM by poskonig
There may be a few people who care, but for most people it is only a minor factor. McCain had military service and was stomped in the primaries by an inexperienced Governor! Your examples (Quayle, Clinton, Bush, Gore) are also recent and very good. I'd also mention the venerable Max Cleland.

Why the fuck are we even discussing this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 04:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC