Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sen Harkin on Cspan 20--saying he is upset with the tenor of DeLay's

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-05 06:31 PM
Original message
Sen Harkin on Cspan 20--saying he is upset with the tenor of DeLay's
tone in public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-05 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. just tuned in
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-05 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. says bill only gives the Fed court the right to decide if they want to
hear the case or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-05 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Now Santorium is talking
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-05 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. everytihing is bipartisin according to Mr. Sandy Man!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-05 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. it is a done deal now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-05 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. this is an appeal--a complete review of the case is what they want
Mel Martines Sen, Rep from Fl now talking.
Says not interfering with judicary by asking for a review.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-05 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. No the bill calls for a complete review
which is why the judge has to ask the feeding to be restarted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreatCaesarsGhost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-05 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
6. looks like there are only two reporters there
and a few photographers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joanski01 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-05 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
7. Santorum finally said something that
was true. He said the other two Senators with him (Harken and Martinez) were better lawyers than he was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-05 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. so Will the Repugs go Judge hunting now?
Edited on Sat Mar-19-05 06:42 PM by rodeodance
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-05 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. reporter asked what Dems were involved --no answer as far as I heard
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mandyky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-05 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
11. If I were Michael Shaivo , I'd sue DeLay for slander
for calling him abusive, etc. Michael Shaivo has tried physical therapy, but her brain is gone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-05 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. yes, I think the hubby should at least publically condeme DeLay's
characterization of him!! It was horrible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-05 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. This case has gone long enough (my opinion) and should end. Harkin
says there are broader issues involved --but I do not think now is the time or place!! The Dems got caught in a trap with this case!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joanski01 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-05 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. And DeLay said that Michael wouldn't
even let them take her outside. DeLay said she hasn't been outside for three years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-05 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. is that true do you think? there is so much bad gossip that it is had to
what the facts are!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-05 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. It's a contest whether the biggest lies come out of the mouths of DeLay,
Rice, Hatch, or Rumsfeld and his boys. I want to add more, they all lie - they must think it is soooooo American or something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-05 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #11
20. I heard it. It was mean. DeLay is a shark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-05 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #11
21. I heard it. It was mean. DeLay is a shark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chipper Chat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-05 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #11
22. Delay also said "I don't care what the husband thinks."
Isn't this entirely contrary to Repub-fundie-think? I mean, they are always spouting this "husband and wife should be totally dedicated to each other" and "the husband's decisions are final" stuff?
I am stunned that the Pubs want to buck the judicial branch like this. So Tom - what do you want? The elimination of the judicial branch? Or just that the courts are relevant only when they make decisions that you agree with? Tom - you are one sad, disgusting example of the human race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joanski01 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-05 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
16. Tune in tomorrow, Sunday, 3/20
The House will come in session at 1:00 p.m. C-Span. The Senate will come into session at 2:00 p.m. C-Span2.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-05 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. you are right, there are only a few reporters present.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sallyseven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-05 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. Most of the house and senate went home. This is a sham
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC