Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Some "training." A translator calls in "sick" and 8 people have to die

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
lebkuchen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-13-03 04:37 PM
Original message
Some "training." A translator calls in "sick" and 8 people have to die
Edited on Sat Sep-13-03 04:37 PM by lebkuchen
Who's training the Iraqi police anyway? Our military? Sounds more like Halliburton...

"The Iraqi forces — sanctioned and trained by the United States..."

http://estripes.com/article.asp?section=104&article=17520


FALLUJAH, Iraq — A fatal shootout Friday might have been avoided if Iraqi security forces could have communicated with American soldiers.

The Iraqi policeman who is the liaison between local Iraqi police and U.S. soldiers was not present early Friday morning, said Iraqi police Maj. Adnan al-Jumaily in an interview Saturday at Fallujah City Hall.

So when Iraqi police and Iraqi Protection Force officers inadvertently got into a firefight with soldiers from the 82nd Airborne Division, the Iraqis had no way to radio the Americans to tell them they were killing friends, not foes, al-Jumaily said.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
alcuno Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-13-03 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. There was a report on the news about how police officers all
over were unable to communicate with the Americans because they had no radios. Sounds like a Halliburton subsidiary to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lebkuchen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-13-03 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. According to this Stripes piece, the training went like this...
What the hell kind of training is this?

*****************************************************

Two complications prevented police from redirecting the U.S. fire so they could withdraw. First, police and soldiers communicate through translators, none of whom was present.

Second, “I can’t call the Americans directly,” al-Jumaily said. “I call my superiors and my superiors call the Americans.”

Without the liaison present at the firefight, the police and protection force personnel had no way to appeal to the soldiers to stop firing, he said.

On the American side, details are still sketchy and the incident is under investigation, said 1st Lt. Ryan Huston, protocol and civil affairs officer for the 1st Battalion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-13-03 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. Just astounding!
And I would venture to guess some of the Pentagon brass that were silenced made this point prior to the war as well.

and as a side note: thanks for the articles you post, lebkuchen, I almost always read them even if I don't post..just wanted you to know your contributions to the board are appreciated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lebkuchen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-13-03 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Amazing to find this stuff in, of all places, the military's paper
Those anti-American chants must have been pretty damn loud. This is the first I've read in Stripes any admittance to the Iraqi's calling the US "occupiers." Those Iraqis ought to get together w/US soldiers, who still think they're the "liberators." Truly, we have a communication problem.

With Stripes, Army Times, and Col. Hackworth screaming "WH incompetence!!" why bother w/the NY Times, eh? btw, tomorrow's Stripes letters will be, once again, utterly damning of the Bush administration.

**************************************************************
Most residents were far less diplomatic, and hundreds of men accompanying the policeman’s casket for the noon ceremony chanted, “America is the enemy of God” while carrying flags from Saddam’s fallen regime.

“The Americans said they were going to free the Iraqi people,” said Sami Ahmed Kalaf, who added that he opposed Saddam. “But, had we known they were going to occupy us, I swear to God, even the little children would have fought them.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unknown Known Donating Member (829 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-13-03 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
5. Probably David Kay's company, Vinnell Corp.
It's all about PMCs (private military companies. Kay has a big stake in Iraq through SAIC, a subcontrator of Vinnel which was bought by Carlyle in 1992 and sold to Northrup Grumman in 1997.

It was Vinnel's headquarters in Riad, Saudi Arabia that was bombed this past summer.

Follow the money. You'll get all your answers. And remember - "war is a racket"
http://www.tompaine.com/feature2.cfm/ID/8791
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-13-03 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. the Iraqi police now say no more co-operation with US military, and
today they let an illegal march of "Friends of Saddam" - all carrying "illegal" oversized weapons and shooting them off - while they stayed off the streets. It was the first return to "Saddam" control of a town, albeit if only for a day, that has occurred in Iraq since we enterred Baghdad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC