|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Woodstock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-13-03 07:19 PM Original message |
Salon.com Tucker Carlson says O'Reilly a blowhard, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PROGRESSIVE1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-13-03 07:22 PM Response to Original message |
1. I must say that I agree with him about.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShaneGR (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-13-03 07:34 PM Response to Original message |
2. OK, Even though I hate him I actually LIKE him for saying this: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Woodstock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-13-03 07:37 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. Yeah, I saw Clinton that way too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alex88 (155 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-13-03 07:39 PM Response to Original message |
4. He used a four letter word |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cheswick2.0 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-13-03 07:40 PM Response to Original message |
5. It takes one to know one I guess |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sophree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-13-03 07:44 PM Response to Original message |
6. I don't get the sanctimoniousness criticism |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KC21304 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-13-03 08:12 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. I agree. Clinton is about the least sanctimonious politician |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Woodstock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-13-03 08:15 PM Response to Reply #6 |
12. Agree, that word was out of place |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
camero (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-13-03 08:22 PM Response to Reply #6 |
15. He raises a good point though. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sophree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-14-03 04:47 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. I agree with that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lumpy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-13-03 07:59 PM Response to Original message |
7. This ass is pandering to liberal readers of Salon |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JasonBerry (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-13-03 08:09 PM Response to Original message |
8. Tucker and Bush: Doesn't anybody remember? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yankeedem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-13-03 08:13 PM Response to Original message |
10. Gee, Tucker, sanctimoneous? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robsul82 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-13-03 08:14 PM Response to Original message |
11. Tucker isn't on our side, but... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FredScuttle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-13-03 08:21 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. ah, he's still a miserable shoe-eater |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mitchum (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-13-03 08:18 PM Response to Original message |
13. pot, meet kettle |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheYellowDog (498 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-14-03 04:52 PM Response to Original message |
17. Lol |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nannygoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-14-03 05:52 PM Response to Original message |
18. The Daily Howler actually pays Bowtie Boy a compliment as well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enraged American (276 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-14-03 05:59 PM Response to Original message |
19. Tucker is the least of our worries. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:07 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC