Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Repug given leave from Army (Gitmo) to cast deciding Gun Vote Missouri

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-14-03 12:56 AM
Original message
Repug given leave from Army (Gitmo) to cast deciding Gun Vote Missouri
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/news/archive/2003/09/12/national1928EDT0768.DTL

The U.S. military will investigate whether regulations were violated when a Missouri state senator was granted leave from duty in Cuba so he could return home to cast the deciding vote to override a veto of concealed guns legislation.

State Sen. Jon Dolan, a Republican and a major in the Army National Guard, had been serving at Guantanamo Bay for only two weeks, and military regulations say a newly deployed soldier must be on duty at least two months before getting a leave.

Lt. Cmdr. Barbara Burfeind, a Pentagon spokeswoman, said Friday that the matter will be investigated by the U.S. Southern Command in Florida, which oversees Guantanamo Bay, where Dolan is stationed as a public affairs officer.

U.S. Rep. William Lacy Clay, D-Mo., sent a letter Friday to Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld seeking an investigation into why Dolan was granted a six-day leave to cast his vote Thursday. The override of Democratic Gov. Bob Holden's veto gave most Missourians the right to carry concealed guns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PinkTiger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-14-03 01:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. Why was Clay surprised?
When you own the Army, you can do as you damn well please. I wonder how Dolan voted on HB 156, regading abortion?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graphixtech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-14-03 01:20 AM
Response to Original message
2. huge (federal law) implications
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wuushew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-14-03 01:22 AM
Response to Original message
3. I predict this will make top 10 conservative idiots within 2 weeks
When you break the law, you go to jail. Isn't that how it is supposed to work?

Can a vote be taken back for circumstances where the voter should not even been present?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC