How the genetically deficient view Clark's entry

[BigMcLargehuge]

From the fringe of Freeperland (P.S. I want hazardous duty pay for slogging through their forums).

To: MamaLucci; Tree of Liberty

IMHO, this means the witch of the east is running.

OF COURSE She is! She Who Must Not Be Named has every intention of running - as the convention draftee. She will then select Clark as Her military expert - that way, She won't soil Her hands with the loathed military.

This "campaign" is just a listening tour, just like Her book was.

17 posted on 09/16/2003 7:33 AM PDT by Old Sarge (Serving You... on Operation Noble Eagle!)
To: areafiftyone

I cannot figure the Clinton's angle on this.

They must expect Dean to carry them to electoral disaster. They don't want anyone except Hillary! running if Bush looks beatable. If not they want one who won't drag the Congressional races as well.

This could be Clark believing his own press releases. Clark doesn't strike me as particularly stable (much like Dean). This could get interesting.

41 posted on 09/16/2003 7:53 AM PDT by Credo
To: Stew Padasso

Apparently they are excited just because he was a military man and they cannot stomach Bush landing on the aircraft carrier (their jealousy is eating them alive) but they will be sorely mistaken when his past comes back to haunt him. One thing we must do is remind the media and the American people about Clark.

50 posted on 09/16/2003 8:00 AM PDT by areafiftyone
To: Brian S

Oh great! Another member of the one-gene pool state running for office. Must be kin to Klinton since he appointed him to NATO and the mess in the Baltics.

58 posted on 09/16/2003 8:05 AM PDT by RetiredArmy (We'll put a boot in your ass, it's the American Way! Toby Keith)
To: Tree of Liberty

Alert: FReeper REQUEST

We are preparing to launch a major anti-Clark website. We are seeking any valuable opposition research. If you have any juicy stuff, please reply privately.

And to those who have already assisted our efforts in advance of this expected decision, we thank you.


60 posted on 09/16/2003 8:07 AM PDT by montag813
To: Tree of Liberty

Alert: FReeper REQUEST

We are preparing to launch a major anti-Clark website. We are seeking any valuable opposition research. If you have any juicy stuff, please reply privately.

And to those who have already assisted our efforts in advance of this expected decision, we thank you.


60 posted on 09/16/2003 8:07 AM PDT by montag813
To: Tree of Liberty

The man has great democrat credentials.

Killing christians(serbs) defending themselves against islamic terrorists(Albanians and their Al Qaeda allies).

A formidible candidate for the 9 dwarfs traveling dog and pony show.

67 posted on 09/16/2003 8:14 AM PDT by gitmogrunt (flame me now, or flame later)

[Cat Atomic]

1. I feel bad for them.

Cognitive dissonance really sucks. It makes you lash out like that.

:/

[NNN0LHI]

2. Them idiots are sure going to need a lot of anti-some Dem sites

At least ten so far. How will they keep up?

Don

[BigMcLargehuge]

3. What makes me shake my head...

is the whole "it's a Clinton conspiracy" thing... They have this whole fantasy land scenario worked out where Senator Clinton is personally manipulating every aspect of their lives and of our collective representative government.

They are nuts.

get the nets.

[WhoCountsTheVotes]

5. no kidding, I think they are projecting on the Clintons

I have never been a fan of Bill Clinton, but the things the freepers say about Bill and Hillary are just crazy. Perhaps it's just projecting on the Clintons what is known about the Bushes - a multi-generational crime family who supported America's enemies like Hitler, Mussolini, Saddam Hussein, Binladen, and Noreiga?

They seem more worried about Clark than any of the other candidates, that's for sure. What is this BS about Clark being involved in Waco? There own post says right in the first paragraph, "While Clark was not involved..." yet they continue to lie and say he was.

Wait a minute, am I acting surprised that freepers are lying? Sorry, I need more coffee!

[Champion Jack]

4. You have to pity the poor freepers

their I.Q. is lower than their blood temperature...

[Melsky]

6. LOL at freepers!

I can't believe how threatened they are by Hillary Clinton.

[Red_Viking]

7. My favorite one:

"Apparently they are excited just because he was a military man and they cannot stomach Bush landing on the aircraft carrier (their jealousy is eating them alive) but they will be sorely mistaken when his past comes back to haunt him. One thing we must do is remind the media and the American people about Clark."

Now, I'm qualified to speak on grammatical matters since I have a degree in English. That first sentence is mighty ambiguous. I'll choose to interpret it to mean Shrub* will have his past come back to bite him and cause plenty of trouble in freeperland. That's the only way that sentence makes any sense.

Quick poll: Are you jealous of our Great Leader*? I'm not. I may be eaten alive with other things, but it's not jealousy of the shrub. Hmmm. I feel sorry for him, same as you would anyone too dumb to know any better. But jealous? Nah.

OK, it's time to pray at the Altar of Clinton. Gotta go.

:dem:
RV

[WoodrowFan]

8. you forgot

your puppy to sacrifice on the alter!

[Rich Hunt]

10. Bush's landing

...because Bush's landing was such an enviable accomplishment.

That's just....delusional. Who would be jealous of that?

[Neecy]

9. jeezus

Apparently they are excited just because he was a military man and they cannot stomach Bush landing on the aircraft carrier (their jealousy is eating them alive) but they will be sorely mistaken when his past comes back to haunt him.

Like AWOL's past came back to haunt him?

I doubt that anyone is jealous of a sock puppet whose owner proclaims "Mission Accomplished" and with that phrase (like "Read my Lips") destroys his chance of reelection. Jealous? Hell, we should all LOVE that little stunt (and why not? Our tax dollars paid for it).