Some RW nutcase columnist wrote in a Brazilian newspaper about that organization. This is the juiciest paragraph of his column:
But the evil this organization does to the Church, infiltrating it to corrode it from inside, doesn't limit itself to pure political macchiavelism. When I say CFFC's catholicism is an intentional parody, I'm not using a figure of speech, but describing a fact: the organization's first public act, as soon as it was established in 1970, was to crown its founder, Patricia F. McQuillan, as "Pope Joanna the First", in a ceremony on the stairs of St. Patrick's Cathedral in NYC. As if this wasn't enough, the movement's magazine, "Conscience", is chock full of explicit declarations of satanism, like for instance verses to the "sweet name of Lucifer, lyric, saint", or this ode to biblical idol Baal: "From the soil where new wheat was sown, Baal rises. In a shout of exhaltation, we rejoice: the Lord has risen, he sits again on the throne. He rules. Hallelujah!"
I didn't find any mention of that in the Web, except here:
http://www.petitiononline.com/cffc/petition.html - no corroboration, of course, and the year is wrong (1974 instead of 1970), and it's only about the "fake Pope" thing. Wait, one more:
http://www.ylcss.edu.hk/Intranet/E-Class/life/QUOTES/G-CFFC.HTM (Religious Right source too)
I can almost imagine the crowning herself Pope antics as a protest performance, but details about such an event are sorely lacking.
And the satanism? This is even shadier -- no mention to it anywhere. I seriously suspect he pulled this out of his ass, or of some random e-mail he got and didn't check since it matches his beliefs.
Wait, wait -- got a mention to it at a CFFC-bashing site:
http://www.hli.org/catholics_for_free_choice_quotes.htmIf you take THEIR word for it (yeah I know), a certain Rosemary Radford Ruether said that in a book. Another mismatch: not the newsletter the columnist mentions. I guess an unrelated book, independently written by a "former CFFC board of directors member" (according to that site) wasn't enough -- he had to embellish facts a little. Also, very little context.
Anyone has more information on the subject?