Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Serious Effort Coming to Reinstate Draft in "Lame Duck" Session 2006

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
chlamor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-05 07:48 PM
Original message
Serious Effort Coming to Reinstate Draft in "Lame Duck" Session 2006
Of course this can't be known with certainty but the PNAC agenda as well as the Neo-Liberal agenda, which is much the same with the variance being primarily one of methodology, requires many more "boots on the ground". A good article which outlines some of the preparations follows:

They're Coming For Your Children

by Korrin Weeks Grigg

The air is thick with signs that a serious effort to reinstate the draft will occur sometime in 2006 – most likely in a "lame duck" session of Congress following mid-term elections.

Investigative reporter Kevin Zees notes that the Center for American Progress (CAP), a liberal think-tank top-heavy with former Clinton administration figures, sponsored a recent forum to discuss a conscription plan quite similar to Russia's. As outlined in the March issue of Washington Monthly by Capt. Philip Carter, U.S. Army (ret.) and Paul Glastris, the plan envisions requiring all 18-year-olds – of both sexes – to serve 1–2 year terms of mandatory service, either in the military, homeland security, or in a federal program like AmeriCorps, as a condition of being permitted to attend college.

This plan would be politically viable, the authors insist, since it would dispense with deferments and exemptions, and allow draftees to choose their preferred form of involuntary servitude. More importantly, however, by having a pool of conscripts required to serve several years of reserve duty, this system would offer "surge capacity" – that is to say, a large and ever-expanding pool of potential coffin-stuffers.

"Both the neo-conservative Project for a New American Century and the 'progressive' Center for American Progress are calling for adding 100,000 new soldiers," writes Zeese. "During the presidential campaign Senator John Kerry also called for adding tens of thousand more troops to the military services." Lawrence Korb, a former Pentagon official under Ronald Reagan who now serves as a Senior Fellow at CAP, also supports expanding the military by 100,000 troops, and while he opposes a return to the draft at present, he would support conscription – amid agonies of professed reluctance – should we remain mired in Iraq for another year, or the Bush administration choose to extend the blessings of "liberation" to Iran, Syria, or some other country.

http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig4/grigg3.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Sandpiper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-05 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. I thought involuntary servitude was abolished
Around the time of the Emancipation Proclamation.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meisje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-05 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. It's always the next year for these cospiracies
I thought the draft was going to be this year? Now it's 2006, in 2006, it will be 2007. Same thing with the stock market crash and the 2nd great depression.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FtWayneBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-05 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. I wondered how the draft board filling was coming along,
but couldn't find anything on their official web site. But there was an online application form for local board member positions. So I filled it out. Three or four days later, I get an official packet to fill out. I am seriously thinking about doing it. The position doesn't pay anything, but heck, those poor kids who are going to get drafted could use a friend on the board. Right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 05:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC