Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why didn't Al Gore challenge voter purging in Florida? Answer inside.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
gully Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-16-03 09:12 PM
Original message
Why didn't Al Gore challenge voter purging in Florida? Answer inside.
Edited on Tue Sep-16-03 09:28 PM by gully
Read on...for an interesting perspective on the issue.

"These false attacks range from accusing Al Gore of not fighting hard enough to win in Florida to blaming Al Gore for the pro Bush media's unprecedented campaign against him. They include allegations that Gore abandoned African American voters who were illegally purged off of the Florida voting rolls, that he vetoed public demonstrations, that he did nothing to promote voting reform and counting all of the votes. The truth is that there was nothing short of starting a civil war that Al Gore could have done to have gotten the uncounted, legal votes in Florida counted."

And...

"Had Al Gore not fought to have the uncounted Florida votes counted, the illegal felon purge, along with the additional illegal acts committed by the Bush campaign and its surrogates, would never have been discovered and there would not now be the NAACP's lawsuit, which is making its way through the courts. It is important to remember that the uncounted legal Florida votes that Al Gore fought to have counted were the votes of African Americans, Hispanics, the elderly and women.

And...

" The allegation that Al Gore did not fight to have all of the votes counted is false. The Gore campaign asked for the votes to be counted in the counties where there were the most uncounted undervotes, since these were the largest number of votes that had not been counted.

Under Florida election law in 2000, all statewide candidates had the right to file election protests in the counties where they disputed the vote totals and wanted a more accurate count. Florida law allows the campaigns 72 hours to file these protests with the county canvassing boards. There was no mechanism for a statewide count.

Had the Gore campaign instead chosen to dispute the purging of legal voters who were illegally denied their right to vote on Election Day, this would not have added any votes to the vote totals. Rather, it would have blocked any attempt to count the legal votes that had been cast on Election Day and not counted because the 72 hour deadline would have passed -- and once that deadline passed, the campaign had no recourse."


It's a very interesting piece, I recommend reading the entire article.

~Peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Democrats unite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-16-03 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. And with none of the votes being counted...
Edited on Tue Sep-16-03 09:23 PM by Democrats unite
It would have went to the Republican controlled House Of Representatives. So whats your point here?

Edit spelling
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gully Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-16-03 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. The point is he did all he could legally and he is not a "racist coward."
Edited on Tue Sep-16-03 09:30 PM by gully
As some contend.

That's about it really. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democrats unite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-16-03 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Sorry but from what I read didn't sound like it to me.
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democrats unite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-16-03 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Please let me rephrase
Maybe I am reading it wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gully Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-16-03 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I think so? N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gully Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-16-03 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Your entitled to your opinion, but your wrong...
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gully Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-03 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Kick....
Everybody should take a look at this as the issue is mentioned here over and over again.

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC